中国哈尔滨道路尘土和绿化带土壤中的溴化阻燃剂:污染特征、来源和健康风险

IF 9 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enceco.2024.05.009
Ye Zhang , Jin-Nong Li , Lin-Hui Zhang , Bo Meng , Yi-Fan Li , Hang Xiao , Kolodeznikov Vasiliy Egorovich , Petrova Natalia Nikolaevna , Zi-Feng Zhang , Zhong-Hua Tang
{"title":"中国哈尔滨道路尘土和绿化带土壤中的溴化阻燃剂:污染特征、来源和健康风险","authors":"Ye Zhang ,&nbsp;Jin-Nong Li ,&nbsp;Lin-Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Bo Meng ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan Li ,&nbsp;Hang Xiao ,&nbsp;Kolodeznikov Vasiliy Egorovich ,&nbsp;Petrova Natalia Nikolaevna ,&nbsp;Zi-Feng Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhong-Hua Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.enceco.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brominated flame retardants (BFRs), categorized as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are difficult to degrade, exhibiting reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity. Exposure to dust and soil particles containing BFRs may cause various health problems. The research aimed to assess the concentrations, potential origins, and health risks associated with polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and novel BFRs (NBFRs) in road dust and green belt soil in Harbin. The study revealed that ΣPBDE concentrations ranging from 0.15 to 193.75 ng/g (median: 48.01 ng/g) in road dust and 8.07 to 195.33 ng/g (median: 38.19 ng/g) in green belt soil. Notably, TBBPA contributed the most to the ΣPBDEs concentrations. And the concentrations of ΣNBFRs ranged from 2.34 to 130.53 ng/g (median: 18.48 ng/g) in road dust and 2.50 to 46.70 ng/g (median: 7.85 ng/g) in green belt soil. And tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) was the most dominant compound in both samples. Highways exhibited lower ΣPBDE concentrations in dust samples but higher ΣNBFR concentrations in soil samples compared to other roads. Moreover, most of the BFRs had a positive correlation with each other, suggesting that they may have similar sources. Principal component analysis (PCA) suggested BFRs sources in road dust may come from wire, paint, building materials or commercial products, likewise, BFRs in green belt soil may come from household or industrial products. Health risk assessment indicated that BFRs in both types of samples in Harbin had no non-carcinogenic risk to residents. These findings provide valuable insights into understanding BFR pollution characteristics, identifying specific sources, and recognizing health hazards in dust and soil samples on roads from Harbin.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100480,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 229-235"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590182624000171/pdfft?md5=e967b761a1a1b375980d5392c1a6c868&pid=1-s2.0-S2590182624000171-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brominated flame retardants in road dust and green belt soil from Harbin, China: Contamination characteristics, sources and health risks\",\"authors\":\"Ye Zhang ,&nbsp;Jin-Nong Li ,&nbsp;Lin-Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Bo Meng ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan Li ,&nbsp;Hang Xiao ,&nbsp;Kolodeznikov Vasiliy Egorovich ,&nbsp;Petrova Natalia Nikolaevna ,&nbsp;Zi-Feng Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhong-Hua Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enceco.2024.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Brominated flame retardants (BFRs), categorized as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are difficult to degrade, exhibiting reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity. Exposure to dust and soil particles containing BFRs may cause various health problems. The research aimed to assess the concentrations, potential origins, and health risks associated with polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and novel BFRs (NBFRs) in road dust and green belt soil in Harbin. The study revealed that ΣPBDE concentrations ranging from 0.15 to 193.75 ng/g (median: 48.01 ng/g) in road dust and 8.07 to 195.33 ng/g (median: 38.19 ng/g) in green belt soil. Notably, TBBPA contributed the most to the ΣPBDEs concentrations. And the concentrations of ΣNBFRs ranged from 2.34 to 130.53 ng/g (median: 18.48 ng/g) in road dust and 2.50 to 46.70 ng/g (median: 7.85 ng/g) in green belt soil. And tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) was the most dominant compound in both samples. Highways exhibited lower ΣPBDE concentrations in dust samples but higher ΣNBFR concentrations in soil samples compared to other roads. Moreover, most of the BFRs had a positive correlation with each other, suggesting that they may have similar sources. Principal component analysis (PCA) suggested BFRs sources in road dust may come from wire, paint, building materials or commercial products, likewise, BFRs in green belt soil may come from household or industrial products. Health risk assessment indicated that BFRs in both types of samples in Harbin had no non-carcinogenic risk to residents. These findings provide valuable insights into understanding BFR pollution characteristics, identifying specific sources, and recognizing health hazards in dust and soil samples on roads from Harbin.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 229-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590182624000171/pdfft?md5=e967b761a1a1b375980d5392c1a6c868&pid=1-s2.0-S2590182624000171-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590182624000171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590182624000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

溴化阻燃剂(BFRs)被归类为持久性有机污染物(POPs),难以降解,具有生殖毒性和致癌性。接触含有溴化阻燃剂的粉尘和土壤颗粒可能会导致各种健康问题。该研究旨在评估哈尔滨市道路扬尘和绿化带土壤中的多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)和新型溴化阻燃剂(NBFRs)的浓度、潜在来源和健康风险。研究结果表明,道路扬尘中的ΣPBDE浓度为0.15-193.75纳克/克(中位数:48.01纳克/克),绿化带土壤中的ΣPBDE浓度为8.07-195.33纳克/克(中位数:38.19纳克/克)。值得注意的是,三溴双酚 A 对 ΣPBDEs 浓度的影响最大。在道路扬尘中,ΣNBFRs 的浓度介于 2.34 至 130.53 纳克/克(中位数:18.48 纳克/克)之间;在绿化带土壤中,ΣNBFRs 的浓度介于 2.50 至 46.70 纳克/克(中位数:7.85 纳克/克)之间。四溴双酚 A(TBBPA)是这两种样本中最主要的化合物。与其他道路相比,高速公路灰尘样本中的ΣPBDE 浓度较低,但土壤样本中的ΣNBFR 浓度较高。此外,大多数溴化阻燃剂之间存在正相关,这表明它们可能有相似的来源。主成分分析表明,道路扬尘中的溴化阻燃剂可能来自电线、油漆、建筑材料或商业产品;同样,绿化带土壤中的溴化阻燃剂可能来自家用产品或工业产品。健康风险评估表明,哈尔滨两类样本中的溴化阻燃剂都不会对居民造成非致癌风险。这些研究结果为了解哈尔滨道路灰尘和土壤样品中溴化阻燃剂的污染特征、确定具体来源以及识别健康危害提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brominated flame retardants in road dust and green belt soil from Harbin, China: Contamination characteristics, sources and health risks

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs), categorized as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are difficult to degrade, exhibiting reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity. Exposure to dust and soil particles containing BFRs may cause various health problems. The research aimed to assess the concentrations, potential origins, and health risks associated with polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and novel BFRs (NBFRs) in road dust and green belt soil in Harbin. The study revealed that ΣPBDE concentrations ranging from 0.15 to 193.75 ng/g (median: 48.01 ng/g) in road dust and 8.07 to 195.33 ng/g (median: 38.19 ng/g) in green belt soil. Notably, TBBPA contributed the most to the ΣPBDEs concentrations. And the concentrations of ΣNBFRs ranged from 2.34 to 130.53 ng/g (median: 18.48 ng/g) in road dust and 2.50 to 46.70 ng/g (median: 7.85 ng/g) in green belt soil. And tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) was the most dominant compound in both samples. Highways exhibited lower ΣPBDE concentrations in dust samples but higher ΣNBFR concentrations in soil samples compared to other roads. Moreover, most of the BFRs had a positive correlation with each other, suggesting that they may have similar sources. Principal component analysis (PCA) suggested BFRs sources in road dust may come from wire, paint, building materials or commercial products, likewise, BFRs in green belt soil may come from household or industrial products. Health risk assessment indicated that BFRs in both types of samples in Harbin had no non-carcinogenic risk to residents. These findings provide valuable insights into understanding BFR pollution characteristics, identifying specific sources, and recognizing health hazards in dust and soil samples on roads from Harbin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of nitrifying bacteria and exploring a novel approach for toxicity monitoring in water Perinatal exposure to PBDE-47 decreases brain glucose metabolism in male adult rats: Associations with shifts in triiodothyronine and neurobehavior Origin of biomarkers (PAH, n-alkane, hopane, estrane) in different colors of plastic resin pellets and surface sediments from coastal area of the Makuran-Oman Sea Associations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure with mortality and effect modification by folate biomarkers in a prospective population The plastisphere ecology: Assessing the impact of different pollution sources on microbial community composition, function and assembly in aquatic ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1