青少年使用数字媒体的偏好、生物行为注意偏差和焦虑症状

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100439
Sarah Myruski , Jennifer de Rutte , Abigail Findley , Amy K. Roy , Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary
{"title":"青少年使用数字媒体的偏好、生物行为注意偏差和焦虑症状","authors":"Sarah Myruski ,&nbsp;Jennifer de Rutte ,&nbsp;Abigail Findley ,&nbsp;Amy K. Roy ,&nbsp;Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adolescence is a critical developmental period of biological and social change during which 1 in 3 youth experience significant anxiety symptoms. The social-emotional lives of the majority of adolescents are largely conducted via digital media use (DMU; e.g., social media, text messaging). Yet the past decade of research on DMU and anxiety has yielded mixed results (e.g., Keles et al., 2020 review), leaving the complex role that DMU might play in the emergence and maintenance of anxiety poorly understood. A key step forward is to leverage psychophysiology to identify individual differences in cognitive and emotional processes that confer vulnerability to potential negative effects of DMU. Further, given the ubiquity of DMU, a greater focus is needed on measurements that move beyond sheer frequency to capture DMU in comparison to face-to-face (FTF) social interactions. This study examined attention bias (AB), characterized by selective and exaggerated attention toward or away from threat, as a moderator of the link between DMU and anxiety in adolescents (<em>N</em> = 75; 42 female) aged 12–14 years (<em>M</em> = 13.28, <em>SD</em> = 0.87). AB was indexed during a dot probe task using reaction time metrics (i.e., trial-level bias) and via ERPs capturing attentional selection and discrimination (N170) and cognitive control (N2) to threat compared to neutral faces. AB moderated associations between DMU and anxiety. A greater preference to use DMU vs FTF predicted greater anxiety among those with a greater behavioral bias away from threat, blunted N170, and blunted N2 in the presence of threat. Future research should examine potential causal and bidirectional links between DMU and anxiety and explore whether preferences for technology-mediated interactions and individual differences in threat processing increase risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000721/pdfft?md5=2f59ea22260916ff84ee8522cfb7d1b3&pid=1-s2.0-S2451958824000721-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference for digital media use, biobehavioral attention bias, and anxiety symptoms in adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Myruski ,&nbsp;Jennifer de Rutte ,&nbsp;Abigail Findley ,&nbsp;Amy K. Roy ,&nbsp;Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adolescence is a critical developmental period of biological and social change during which 1 in 3 youth experience significant anxiety symptoms. The social-emotional lives of the majority of adolescents are largely conducted via digital media use (DMU; e.g., social media, text messaging). Yet the past decade of research on DMU and anxiety has yielded mixed results (e.g., Keles et al., 2020 review), leaving the complex role that DMU might play in the emergence and maintenance of anxiety poorly understood. A key step forward is to leverage psychophysiology to identify individual differences in cognitive and emotional processes that confer vulnerability to potential negative effects of DMU. Further, given the ubiquity of DMU, a greater focus is needed on measurements that move beyond sheer frequency to capture DMU in comparison to face-to-face (FTF) social interactions. This study examined attention bias (AB), characterized by selective and exaggerated attention toward or away from threat, as a moderator of the link between DMU and anxiety in adolescents (<em>N</em> = 75; 42 female) aged 12–14 years (<em>M</em> = 13.28, <em>SD</em> = 0.87). AB was indexed during a dot probe task using reaction time metrics (i.e., trial-level bias) and via ERPs capturing attentional selection and discrimination (N170) and cognitive control (N2) to threat compared to neutral faces. AB moderated associations between DMU and anxiety. A greater preference to use DMU vs FTF predicted greater anxiety among those with a greater behavioral bias away from threat, blunted N170, and blunted N2 in the presence of threat. Future research should examine potential causal and bidirectional links between DMU and anxiety and explore whether preferences for technology-mediated interactions and individual differences in threat processing increase risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000721/pdfft?md5=2f59ea22260916ff84ee8522cfb7d1b3&pid=1-s2.0-S2451958824000721-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青春期是生理和社会变革的关键发展时期,在此期间,每 3 个青少年中就有 1 个会出现明显的焦虑症状。大多数青少年的社会情感生活主要是通过使用数字媒体(DMU,如社交媒体、短信)来实现的。然而,过去十年有关 DMU 和焦虑症的研究结果喜忧参半(如 Keles 等人,2020 年综述),人们对 DMU 在焦虑症的产生和维持过程中可能扮演的复杂角色知之甚少。向前迈出的关键一步是利用心理生理学来识别认知和情绪过程中的个体差异,这些差异会使个体容易受到 DMU 潜在负面影响的影响。此外,考虑到 DMU 的普遍性,我们需要更加关注那些超越纯粹频率的测量方法,以捕捉 DMU 与面对面 (FTF) 社交互动的比较。本研究对注意力偏差(AB)进行了研究,注意力偏差的特点是对威胁的选择性和夸大性注意,它是 DMU 与焦虑之间联系的调节因素,研究对象为 12-14 岁青少年(75 人,42 名女性)(中=13.28,标差=0.87)。在点探究任务中,利用反应时间指标(即试验水平偏差)和捕捉注意力选择和辨别(N170)以及认知控制(N2)的ERPs对与中性面孔相比的威胁进行AB指数化。AB 调节了 DMU 与焦虑之间的关联。更倾向于使用 DMU 而不是 FTF 的人,预示着在威胁面前行为偏差更大、N170 变钝和 N2 变钝的人更焦虑。未来的研究应该检查 DMU 与焦虑之间潜在的因果关系和双向联系,并探索对以技术为媒介的互动的偏好和个体在威胁处理方面的差异是否会增加风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preference for digital media use, biobehavioral attention bias, and anxiety symptoms in adolescents

Adolescence is a critical developmental period of biological and social change during which 1 in 3 youth experience significant anxiety symptoms. The social-emotional lives of the majority of adolescents are largely conducted via digital media use (DMU; e.g., social media, text messaging). Yet the past decade of research on DMU and anxiety has yielded mixed results (e.g., Keles et al., 2020 review), leaving the complex role that DMU might play in the emergence and maintenance of anxiety poorly understood. A key step forward is to leverage psychophysiology to identify individual differences in cognitive and emotional processes that confer vulnerability to potential negative effects of DMU. Further, given the ubiquity of DMU, a greater focus is needed on measurements that move beyond sheer frequency to capture DMU in comparison to face-to-face (FTF) social interactions. This study examined attention bias (AB), characterized by selective and exaggerated attention toward or away from threat, as a moderator of the link between DMU and anxiety in adolescents (N = 75; 42 female) aged 12–14 years (M = 13.28, SD = 0.87). AB was indexed during a dot probe task using reaction time metrics (i.e., trial-level bias) and via ERPs capturing attentional selection and discrimination (N170) and cognitive control (N2) to threat compared to neutral faces. AB moderated associations between DMU and anxiety. A greater preference to use DMU vs FTF predicted greater anxiety among those with a greater behavioral bias away from threat, blunted N170, and blunted N2 in the presence of threat. Future research should examine potential causal and bidirectional links between DMU and anxiety and explore whether preferences for technology-mediated interactions and individual differences in threat processing increase risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between regulatory processes and problematic social media use: A systematic review Virtual reality based executive function training in schools: The experience of primary school-aged children, teachers and training teaching assistants Trust and distrust coexistence and change in the adoption of an emerging technology in organizations Computer use and cardiovascular risk biomarkers in midlife and older adults Global research trends on cyberbullying: A bibliometric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1