Hye Lim Park, Sonya Youngju Park, Mingeon Kim, Soyeon Paeng, Eun Jeong Min, Inki Hong, Judson Jones, Eun Ji Han
{"title":"通过数据驱动的运动校正提高脑淀粉样蛋白 PET 成像的诊断精度。","authors":"Hye Lim Park, Sonya Youngju Park, Mingeon Kim, Soyeon Paeng, Eun Jeong Min, Inki Hong, Judson Jones, Eun Ji Han","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00653-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head motion during brain positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging degrades image quality, resulting in reduced reading accuracy. We evaluated the performance of a head motion correction algorithm using <sup>18</sup>F-flutemetamol (FMM) brain PET/CT images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FMM brain PET/CT images were retrospectively included, and PET images were reconstructed using a motion correction algorithm: (1) motion estimation through 3D time-domain signal analysis, signal smoothing, and calculation of motion-free intervals using a Merging Adjacent Clustering method; (2) estimation of 3D motion transformations using the Summing Tree Structural algorithm; and (3) calculation of the final motion-corrected images using the 3D motion transformations during the iterative reconstruction process. All conventional and motion-corrected PET images were visually reviewed by two readers. Image quality was evaluated using a 3-point scale, and the presence of amyloid deposition was interpreted as negative, positive, or equivocal. For quantitative analysis, we calculated the uptake ratio (UR) of 5 specific brain regions, with the cerebellar cortex as a reference region. The results of the conventional and motion-corrected PET images were statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 108 sets of FMM brain PET images from 108 patients (34 men and 74 women; median age, 78 years) were included. After motion correction, image quality significantly improved (p < 0.001), and there were no images of poor quality. In the visual analysis of amyloid deposition, higher interobserver agreements were observed in motion-corrected PET images for all specific regions. In the quantitative analysis, the UR difference between the conventional and motion-corrected PET images was significantly higher in the group with head motion than in the group without head motion (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The motion correction algorithm provided better image quality and higher interobserver agreement. Therefore, we suggest that this algorithm be adopted as a routine post-processing protocol in amyloid brain PET/CT imaging and applied to brain PET scans with other radiotracers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving diagnostic precision in amyloid brain PET imaging through data-driven motion correction.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Lim Park, Sonya Youngju Park, Mingeon Kim, Soyeon Paeng, Eun Jeong Min, Inki Hong, Judson Jones, Eun Ji Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-024-00653-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head motion during brain positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging degrades image quality, resulting in reduced reading accuracy. We evaluated the performance of a head motion correction algorithm using <sup>18</sup>F-flutemetamol (FMM) brain PET/CT images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FMM brain PET/CT images were retrospectively included, and PET images were reconstructed using a motion correction algorithm: (1) motion estimation through 3D time-domain signal analysis, signal smoothing, and calculation of motion-free intervals using a Merging Adjacent Clustering method; (2) estimation of 3D motion transformations using the Summing Tree Structural algorithm; and (3) calculation of the final motion-corrected images using the 3D motion transformations during the iterative reconstruction process. All conventional and motion-corrected PET images were visually reviewed by two readers. Image quality was evaluated using a 3-point scale, and the presence of amyloid deposition was interpreted as negative, positive, or equivocal. For quantitative analysis, we calculated the uptake ratio (UR) of 5 specific brain regions, with the cerebellar cortex as a reference region. The results of the conventional and motion-corrected PET images were statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 108 sets of FMM brain PET images from 108 patients (34 men and 74 women; median age, 78 years) were included. After motion correction, image quality significantly improved (p < 0.001), and there were no images of poor quality. In the visual analysis of amyloid deposition, higher interobserver agreements were observed in motion-corrected PET images for all specific regions. In the quantitative analysis, the UR difference between the conventional and motion-corrected PET images was significantly higher in the group with head motion than in the group without head motion (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The motion correction algorithm provided better image quality and higher interobserver agreement. Therefore, we suggest that this algorithm be adopted as a routine post-processing protocol in amyloid brain PET/CT imaging and applied to brain PET scans with other radiotracers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178732/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00653-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00653-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:脑部正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)成像过程中的头部运动会降低图像质量,从而降低阅读准确性。我们利用18F-氟替美托(FMM)脑PET/CT图像评估了头部运动校正算法的性能:方法:回顾性纳入 FMM 脑 PET/CT 图像,并使用运动校正算法重建 PET 图像:(1)通过三维时域信号分析、信号平滑和使用合并相邻聚类法计算无运动区间来估计运动;(2)使用求和树结构算法估计三维运动变换;(3)在迭代重建过程中使用三维运动变换计算最终的运动校正图像。所有常规和运动校正 PET 图像均由两名阅读者进行目视审查。图像质量采用 3 级评分法进行评估,淀粉样蛋白沉积被解释为阴性、阳性或模糊。为了进行定量分析,我们以小脑皮层为参照区,计算了 5 个特定脑区的摄取比(UR)。我们对传统 PET 图像和运动校正 PET 图像的结果进行了统计比较:结果:共纳入了 108 名患者(34 名男性,74 名女性;中位年龄 78 岁)的 108 组 FMM 脑 PET 图像。运动校正后,图像质量明显改善(p 结论:运动校正算法提供了更好的图像质量:运动校正算法提供了更好的图像质量和更高的观察者间一致性。因此,我们建议将该算法作为淀粉样蛋白脑 PET/CT 成像的常规后处理方案,并应用于其他放射性核素的脑 PET 扫描。
Improving diagnostic precision in amyloid brain PET imaging through data-driven motion correction.
Background: Head motion during brain positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging degrades image quality, resulting in reduced reading accuracy. We evaluated the performance of a head motion correction algorithm using 18F-flutemetamol (FMM) brain PET/CT images.
Methods: FMM brain PET/CT images were retrospectively included, and PET images were reconstructed using a motion correction algorithm: (1) motion estimation through 3D time-domain signal analysis, signal smoothing, and calculation of motion-free intervals using a Merging Adjacent Clustering method; (2) estimation of 3D motion transformations using the Summing Tree Structural algorithm; and (3) calculation of the final motion-corrected images using the 3D motion transformations during the iterative reconstruction process. All conventional and motion-corrected PET images were visually reviewed by two readers. Image quality was evaluated using a 3-point scale, and the presence of amyloid deposition was interpreted as negative, positive, or equivocal. For quantitative analysis, we calculated the uptake ratio (UR) of 5 specific brain regions, with the cerebellar cortex as a reference region. The results of the conventional and motion-corrected PET images were statistically compared.
Results: In total, 108 sets of FMM brain PET images from 108 patients (34 men and 74 women; median age, 78 years) were included. After motion correction, image quality significantly improved (p < 0.001), and there were no images of poor quality. In the visual analysis of amyloid deposition, higher interobserver agreements were observed in motion-corrected PET images for all specific regions. In the quantitative analysis, the UR difference between the conventional and motion-corrected PET images was significantly higher in the group with head motion than in the group without head motion (p = 0.016).
Conclusions: The motion correction algorithm provided better image quality and higher interobserver agreement. Therefore, we suggest that this algorithm be adopted as a routine post-processing protocol in amyloid brain PET/CT imaging and applied to brain PET scans with other radiotracers.
期刊介绍:
EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.