Retrospective radiographic study comparing unintentional extrusion of gutta-percha versus sealer on teeth with periapical radiolucency.

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was the radiographic evaluation of endodontically treated teeth presenting periapical radiolucency and unintentional overfilling with gutta-percha or sealer on treatment outcome and persistence of the extruded materials.

Method and materials: After assessment using periapical index (PAI), 202 roots filled with gutta-percha and zinc oxide-eugenol sealer (Roth 811, Roth International), exhibiting unintentional overfilling and periapical radiolucency were selected. All cases had at least 1 year of follow-up. Type of extruded material, periapical status, and removal/persistence of the extruded material were evaluated by two independent observers. Data were statistically analyzed using logistic and linear regression analysis.

Results: Tooth location (P .001), follow-up period (P .001), and type of extruded material (P = .004) significantly influenced treatment outcomes. Specifically, posterior roots exhibited better outcomes compared to anterior, and cases with overfilling of sealer showed superior healing potential compared to those with gutta-percha overfilling. Additionally, longer recall periods were associated with improved treatment success. The type of extruded material (P .001) and follow-up period (P .001) significantly affected the presence of extruded material in the follow-up radiograph. The persistence of extruded material was greater when gutta-percha was extruded, and extruded materials were less detected when the follow-up period was longer.

Conclusion: Teeth with periapical radiolucency and unintentional overfilling require longer follow-up intervals for effective monitoring of healing. Treatment outcome was associated with the type of extruded materials used in the present study. The persistence of those materials in the periapex did not affect healing.