深度扩增子测序揭示了临床样本对结核分枝杆菌培养的选择。

Jiuxin Qu, Wanfei Liu, Shuyan Chen, Chi Wu, Wenjie Lai, Rui Qin, Feidi Ye, Yuanchun Li, Liang Fu, Guofang Deng, Lei Liu, Qiang Lin, Peng Cui
{"title":"深度扩增子测序揭示了临床样本对结核分枝杆菌培养的选择。","authors":"Jiuxin Qu, Wanfei Liu, Shuyan Chen, Chi Wu, Wenjie Lai, Rui Qin, Feidi Ye, Yuanchun Li, Liang Fu, Guofang Deng, Lei Liu, Qiang Lin, Peng Cui","doi":"10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The commonly-used drug susceptibility testing (DST) relies on bacterial culture and faces shortcomings such as long turnaround time and clone/subclone selection. We developed a targeted deep amplification sequencing (DAS) method directly applied to clinical specimens. In this DAS panel, we examined 941 drug-resistant mutations associated with 20 anti-tuberculosis drugs with an initial amount of 4 pg DNA and reduced clinical testing time from 20 days to two days. A prospective study was conducted using 115 clinical specimens mainly with Xpert® Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (Xpert MTB/RIF) assay positive to evaluate drug-resistant mutation detection. DAS was performed on culture-free specimens, while culture-dependent isolates were used for phenotypic DST, DAS, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). For in silico molecular DST, our result based on DAS panel revealed the similar accuracy to three published reports based on WGS. For 82 isolates, application of DAS showed better sensitivity (93.03% vs. 92.16%), specificity (96.10% vs. 95.02%), and accuracy (91.33% vs. 90.62%) than Mykrobe software using WGS. Compared to culture-dependent WGS, culture-free DAS provides a full picture of sequence variation at population level, exhibiting in detail the gain-and-loss variants caused by bacterial culture. Our study performs a systematic verification of the advantages of DAS in clinical applications and comprehensively illustrates the discrepancy in Mycobacterium tuberculosis before and after culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":94020,"journal":{"name":"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Amplicon Sequencing Reveals Culture Selection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis by Clinical Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Jiuxin Qu, Wanfei Liu, Shuyan Chen, Chi Wu, Wenjie Lai, Rui Qin, Feidi Ye, Yuanchun Li, Liang Fu, Guofang Deng, Lei Liu, Qiang Lin, Peng Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The commonly-used drug susceptibility testing (DST) relies on bacterial culture and faces shortcomings such as long turnaround time and clone/subclone selection. We developed a targeted deep amplification sequencing (DAS) method directly applied to clinical specimens. In this DAS panel, we examined 941 drug-resistant mutations associated with 20 anti-tuberculosis drugs with an initial amount of 4 pg DNA and reduced clinical testing time from 20 days to two days. A prospective study was conducted using 115 clinical specimens mainly with Xpert® Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (Xpert MTB/RIF) assay positive to evaluate drug-resistant mutation detection. DAS was performed on culture-free specimens, while culture-dependent isolates were used for phenotypic DST, DAS, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). For in silico molecular DST, our result based on DAS panel revealed the similar accuracy to three published reports based on WGS. For 82 isolates, application of DAS showed better sensitivity (93.03% vs. 92.16%), specificity (96.10% vs. 95.02%), and accuracy (91.33% vs. 90.62%) than Mykrobe software using WGS. Compared to culture-dependent WGS, culture-free DAS provides a full picture of sequence variation at population level, exhibiting in detail the gain-and-loss variants caused by bacterial culture. Our study performs a systematic verification of the advantages of DAS in clinical applications and comprehensively illustrates the discrepancy in Mycobacterium tuberculosis before and after culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

常用的药敏试验(DST)依赖于细菌培养,面临着周转时间长和克隆/亚克隆选择等缺点。我们开发了一种直接应用于临床标本的靶向深度扩增测序(DAS)方法。在这一 DAS 面板中,我们检测了与 20 种抗结核药物相关的 941 个耐药突变,初始 DNA 量为 4 pg,并将临床检测时间从 20 天缩短至两天。一项前瞻性研究使用了 115 份临床标本,主要是 Xpert® 结核分枝杆菌/利福平(Xpert MTB/RIF)检测呈阳性的标本,以评估耐药突变的检测情况。DAS在无培养标本上进行,而依赖培养的分离株则用于表型DST、DAS和全基因组测序(WGS)。在硅分子 DST 方面,我们基于 DAS 面板得出的结果与已发表的三篇基于 WGS 的报告具有相似的准确性。对于 82 个分离物,应用 DAS 的灵敏度(93.03% 对 92.16%)、特异性(96.10% 对 95.02%)和准确性(91.33% 对 90.62%)均优于使用 WGS 的 Mykrobe 软件。与依赖培养基的 WGS 相比,无培养基 DAS 能提供群体水平上序列变异的全貌,详细展示细菌培养引起的增减变异。我们的研究系统地验证了 DAS 在临床应用中的优势,并全面说明了培养前后结核分枝杆菌的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Amplicon Sequencing Reveals Culture Selection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis by Clinical Samples.

The commonly-used drug susceptibility testing (DST) relies on bacterial culture and faces shortcomings such as long turnaround time and clone/subclone selection. We developed a targeted deep amplification sequencing (DAS) method directly applied to clinical specimens. In this DAS panel, we examined 941 drug-resistant mutations associated with 20 anti-tuberculosis drugs with an initial amount of 4 pg DNA and reduced clinical testing time from 20 days to two days. A prospective study was conducted using 115 clinical specimens mainly with Xpert® Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (Xpert MTB/RIF) assay positive to evaluate drug-resistant mutation detection. DAS was performed on culture-free specimens, while culture-dependent isolates were used for phenotypic DST, DAS, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). For in silico molecular DST, our result based on DAS panel revealed the similar accuracy to three published reports based on WGS. For 82 isolates, application of DAS showed better sensitivity (93.03% vs. 92.16%), specificity (96.10% vs. 95.02%), and accuracy (91.33% vs. 90.62%) than Mykrobe software using WGS. Compared to culture-dependent WGS, culture-free DAS provides a full picture of sequence variation at population level, exhibiting in detail the gain-and-loss variants caused by bacterial culture. Our study performs a systematic verification of the advantages of DAS in clinical applications and comprehensively illustrates the discrepancy in Mycobacterium tuberculosis before and after culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laws of Genome Nucleotide Composition. Single-cell RNA-seq Reveals that Methamphetamine Inhibits Liver Immunity with Involvement of Dopamine Receptor D1. eRNA-IDO: A One-stop Platform for Identification, Interactome Discovery, and Functional Annotation of Enhancer RNAs. Cancer Stemness Online: A Resource for Investigating Cancer Stemness and Associations with Immune Response. Computational Strategies and Algorithms for Inferring Cellular Composition of Spatial Transcriptomics Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1