多发性硬化症患者的实际和想象音乐诱导步态训练:双盲随机平行多中心试验。

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1177/15459683241260724
Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Bettina Heschl, Rainer Ehling, Stefanie Hechenberger, Markus Reindl, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Florian Deisenhammer, Christian Brenneis Md
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者的实际和想象音乐诱导步态训练:双盲随机平行多中心试验。","authors":"Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Bettina Heschl, Rainer Ehling, Stefanie Hechenberger, Markus Reindl, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Florian Deisenhammer, Christian Brenneis Md","doi":"10.1177/15459683241260724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.019) and distance (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.348 and η<sup>2</sup> = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"555-569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual and Imagined Music-Cued Gait Training in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Parallel Multicenter Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Bettina Heschl, Rainer Ehling, Stefanie Hechenberger, Markus Reindl, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Florian Deisenhammer, Christian Brenneis Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683241260724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.019) and distance (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.348 and η<sup>2</sup> = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"555-569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241260724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241260724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,实际步态训练和想象步态训练尚未进行比较:在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,尚未对实际和想象的提示步态训练进行比较:分析提示运动想象(CMI)、提示步态训练(CGT)以及CMI和提示步态训练相结合(CMI-CGT)对多发性硬化症患者的运动、认知和情绪功能以及与健康相关的生活质量的影响:在这项双盲随机平行组多中心试验中,多发性硬化症患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受CMI、CMI-CGT或CGT训练,每周4次,每次30分钟,为期4周。患者在家练习,使用录音指导,并得到≥6次电话支持。在第 0 周、第 4 周和第 13 周收集数据。共同主要结果为步行速度和距离,采用意向治疗法进行分析。次要结果包括整体认知障碍、焦虑、抑郁、自杀、疲劳、HRQoL、运动想象能力、音乐诱发的动机、愉悦和唤醒、自我效能和认知功能。对不良事件和跌倒进行了持续监测:在筛选出的 1559 名患者中,132 人被随机分配:44人接受了CMI治疗,44人接受了CMI-CGT治疗,44人接受了CGT治疗。没有一项干预措施在影响步行速度或距离方面表现出优越性,在组间比较中观察到的对步行速度(η2 = 0.019)和距离(η2 = 0.005)的影响可以忽略不计。随着时间的推移,步行速度和步行距离的改善对CMI、CMI-CGT和CGT有较大影响(分别为η2 = 0.348和η2 = 0.454)。未报告与研究相关的严重不良事件:结论:与单独使用CMI和CGT相比,CMI-GT并不能改善多发性硬化症患者的行走速度和距离。缺乏真正的对照组是研究的局限性之一:试验注册:德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS00023978。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Actual and Imagined Music-Cued Gait Training in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Parallel Multicenter Trial.

Background: Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objective: To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS.

Methods: In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored.

Results: Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η2 = 0.019) and distance (η2 = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η2 = 0.348 and η2 = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1