多发性硬化症患者的实际和想象音乐诱导步态训练:双盲随机平行多中心试验。

IF 3.7 Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1177/15459683241260724
Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Bettina Heschl, Rainer Ehling, Stefanie Hechenberger, Markus Reindl, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Florian Deisenhammer, Christian Brenneis Md
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者的实际和想象音乐诱导步态训练:双盲随机平行多中心试验。","authors":"Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Bettina Heschl, Rainer Ehling, Stefanie Hechenberger, Markus Reindl, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Florian Deisenhammer, Christian Brenneis Md","doi":"10.1177/15459683241260724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.019) and distance (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.348 and η<sup>2</sup> = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"555-569"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual and Imagined Music-Cued Gait Training in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Parallel Multicenter Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Seebacher, Birgit Helmlinger, Daniela Pinter, Bettina Heschl, Rainer Ehling, Stefanie Hechenberger, Markus Reindl, Michael Khalil, Christian Enzinger, Florian Deisenhammer, Christian Brenneis Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683241260724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.019) and distance (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.348 and η<sup>2</sup> = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"555-569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241260724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241260724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,实际步态训练和想象步态训练尚未进行比较:在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,尚未对实际和想象的提示步态训练进行比较:分析提示运动想象(CMI)、提示步态训练(CGT)以及CMI和提示步态训练相结合(CMI-CGT)对多发性硬化症患者的运动、认知和情绪功能以及与健康相关的生活质量的影响:在这项双盲随机平行组多中心试验中,多发性硬化症患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受CMI、CMI-CGT或CGT训练,每周4次,每次30分钟,为期4周。患者在家练习,使用录音指导,并得到≥6次电话支持。在第 0 周、第 4 周和第 13 周收集数据。共同主要结果为步行速度和距离,采用意向治疗法进行分析。次要结果包括整体认知障碍、焦虑、抑郁、自杀、疲劳、HRQoL、运动想象能力、音乐诱发的动机、愉悦和唤醒、自我效能和认知功能。对不良事件和跌倒进行了持续监测:在筛选出的 1559 名患者中,132 人被随机分配:44人接受了CMI治疗,44人接受了CMI-CGT治疗,44人接受了CGT治疗。没有一项干预措施在影响步行速度或距离方面表现出优越性,在组间比较中观察到的对步行速度(η2 = 0.019)和距离(η2 = 0.005)的影响可以忽略不计。随着时间的推移,步行速度和步行距离的改善对CMI、CMI-CGT和CGT有较大影响(分别为η2 = 0.348和η2 = 0.454)。未报告与研究相关的严重不良事件:结论:与单独使用CMI和CGT相比,CMI-GT并不能改善多发性硬化症患者的行走速度和距离。缺乏真正的对照组是研究的局限性之一:试验注册:德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS00023978。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Actual and Imagined Music-Cued Gait Training in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Parallel Multicenter Trial.

Background: Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objective: To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS.

Methods: In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored.

Results: Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η2 = 0.019) and distance (η2 = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η2 = 0.348 and η2 = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Aerobic Exercise on Brain MRI Measures in Parkinson's Disease. Key Influencers of Community Ambulation Post-Stroke: Insights from a Mapping Review. Individualized Prediction of Upper Limb Strength Recovery After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Development and Validation of Simple Prognostic Models. External Validation of the EPOS Prediction Model for Independent Gait After Stroke. Prediction of Motor Outcome in Patients With Severe Upper Limb Impairment After Stroke Using Motor Evoked Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1