学习汇报语言:性侵犯鉴定专家的见解

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101567
Cynthia Sherraden Bradley PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF, Ellen A. Frerich MSW, MPP, MN, RN, PHN, Winnie Yip MSN, APRN, PMHNP-BC, Sarah J. Hoffman PhD, MPH, RN, SANE-A, Carolyn M. Porta PhD, MPH, RN, SANE-A, FAAN, FNAP
{"title":"学习汇报语言:性侵犯鉴定专家的见解","authors":"Cynthia Sherraden Bradley PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF,&nbsp;Ellen A. Frerich MSW, MPP, MN, RN, PHN,&nbsp;Winnie Yip MSN, APRN, PMHNP-BC,&nbsp;Sarah J. Hoffman PhD, MPH, RN, SANE-A,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Porta PhD, MPH, RN, SANE-A, FAAN, FNAP","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A forensic sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) provides specialized care for individuals who have experienced sexual assault. Because the training of new SANEs is critical for expanding the workforce, simulation and debriefing are used due to limited clinical learning opportunities with assault survivors. Debriefing following the simulation requires an expert SANE, yet very often these clinicians are new to debriefing; little is known about how expert SANEs learn to debrief.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A 90-minute focus group interview was conducted with three experienced SANEs who had completed a five-video debriefing training and conducted at least two debriefings with novice SANE trainees.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inductive qualitative content analysis resulted in two primary categories and six sub-categories that described the process of expert SANEs learning to debrief.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Expert SANEs compared learning to debrief to learning a new language. Participants described how reflective debriefing and trauma-informed interviewing both emphasize the importance of creating a safe and supportive environment, fostering open communication, promoting self-awareness and learning, empowering individuals, and adopting a non-judgmental approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning the Language of Debriefing: Insights from Expert Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Sherraden Bradley PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF,&nbsp;Ellen A. Frerich MSW, MPP, MN, RN, PHN,&nbsp;Winnie Yip MSN, APRN, PMHNP-BC,&nbsp;Sarah J. Hoffman PhD, MPH, RN, SANE-A,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Porta PhD, MPH, RN, SANE-A, FAAN, FNAP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A forensic sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) provides specialized care for individuals who have experienced sexual assault. Because the training of new SANEs is critical for expanding the workforce, simulation and debriefing are used due to limited clinical learning opportunities with assault survivors. Debriefing following the simulation requires an expert SANE, yet very often these clinicians are new to debriefing; little is known about how expert SANEs learn to debrief.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A 90-minute focus group interview was conducted with three experienced SANEs who had completed a five-video debriefing training and conducted at least two debriefings with novice SANE trainees.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inductive qualitative content analysis resulted in two primary categories and six sub-categories that described the process of expert SANEs learning to debrief.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Expert SANEs compared learning to debrief to learning a new language. Participants described how reflective debriefing and trauma-informed interviewing both emphasize the importance of creating a safe and supportive environment, fostering open communication, promoting self-awareness and learning, empowering individuals, and adopting a non-judgmental approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000598\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景性侵犯法医护士(SANE)为遭受性侵犯的人提供专业护理。由于培训新的 SANE 对扩大工作队伍至关重要,因此使用了模拟和情况汇报,这是因为与性侵犯幸存者进行临床学习的机会有限。方法对三位经验丰富的 SANE 进行了 90 分钟的焦点小组访谈,这些 SANE 已完成了五段视频汇报培训,并与 SANE 新手学员进行了至少两次汇报。结果归纳式定性内容分析得出了两个主要类别和六个子类别,描述了 SANE 专家学习汇报的过程。参与者描述了反思性汇报和创伤知情访谈如何都强调了创造安全和支持性环境、促进开放式交流、促进自我意识和学习、增强个人能力以及采用非评判性方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning the Language of Debriefing: Insights from Expert Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners

Background

A forensic sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) provides specialized care for individuals who have experienced sexual assault. Because the training of new SANEs is critical for expanding the workforce, simulation and debriefing are used due to limited clinical learning opportunities with assault survivors. Debriefing following the simulation requires an expert SANE, yet very often these clinicians are new to debriefing; little is known about how expert SANEs learn to debrief.

Method

A 90-minute focus group interview was conducted with three experienced SANEs who had completed a five-video debriefing training and conducted at least two debriefings with novice SANE trainees.

Results

Inductive qualitative content analysis resulted in two primary categories and six sub-categories that described the process of expert SANEs learning to debrief.

Conclusion

Expert SANEs compared learning to debrief to learning a new language. Participants described how reflective debriefing and trauma-informed interviewing both emphasize the importance of creating a safe and supportive environment, fostering open communication, promoting self-awareness and learning, empowering individuals, and adopting a non-judgmental approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Embracing quick response technology to bring assessments to life during simulation Combining storytelling and a scenario re-enactment of Mt. Everest expeditions to practice cognitive and social skills Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations Becoming a team player: Evaluating a simulation interprofessional activity between third year nursing students and second year medical radiation science students - A feasibility study Interprofessional Learning for Nursing Students during a Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1