激励计划对分配偏好和预期的溢出效应

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102241
Matthias Greiff , Marcus Giamattei
{"title":"激励计划对分配偏好和预期的溢出效应","authors":"Matthias Greiff ,&nbsp;Marcus Giamattei","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the workplace, incentive schemes may spill over on distributional preferences and beliefs, which underlie an employee’s willingness to cooperate. In an online experiment, we analyze how different incentive schemes and the corresponding feedback affect distributional preferences and beliefs. In six different treatments, we vary the incentive scheme (competitive vs team incentives) for a real-effort task and the feedback participants receive at the end of the real-effort task. Subsequently, we measure participants’ social value orientation (SVO), a proxy for distributional preferences, and the corresponding beliefs about other’s SVO. If no feedback is provided, participants show stronger SVOs if they are incentivized by team incentives in comparison to piece-rate remuneration. Surprisingly, this positive effect prevails under competitive incentives without feedback. With feedback about relative performance, the spillover effects differ between the incentive schemes. Under competitive incentives, participants show lower SVOs (negative spillovers), but only for low performers. Under team incentives, we find negative spillovers on preferences for high performers and positive spillovers for low performers. We find no evidence for spillovers on beliefs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432400079X/pdfft?md5=8a64e238acdb62ed62c51c130784b0e0&pid=1-s2.0-S221480432400079X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spillovers from incentive schemes on distributional preferences and expectations\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Greiff ,&nbsp;Marcus Giamattei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the workplace, incentive schemes may spill over on distributional preferences and beliefs, which underlie an employee’s willingness to cooperate. In an online experiment, we analyze how different incentive schemes and the corresponding feedback affect distributional preferences and beliefs. In six different treatments, we vary the incentive scheme (competitive vs team incentives) for a real-effort task and the feedback participants receive at the end of the real-effort task. Subsequently, we measure participants’ social value orientation (SVO), a proxy for distributional preferences, and the corresponding beliefs about other’s SVO. If no feedback is provided, participants show stronger SVOs if they are incentivized by team incentives in comparison to piece-rate remuneration. Surprisingly, this positive effect prevails under competitive incentives without feedback. With feedback about relative performance, the spillover effects differ between the incentive schemes. Under competitive incentives, participants show lower SVOs (negative spillovers), but only for low performers. Under team incentives, we find negative spillovers on preferences for high performers and positive spillovers for low performers. We find no evidence for spillovers on beliefs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432400079X/pdfft?md5=8a64e238acdb62ed62c51c130784b0e0&pid=1-s2.0-S221480432400079X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432400079X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432400079X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工作场所,激励方案可能会影响分配偏好和信念,而分配偏好和信念是员工合作意愿的基础。在一项在线实验中,我们分析了不同的激励方案和相应的反馈如何影响分配偏好和信念。在六个不同的处理中,我们改变了实际工作任务的激励方案(竞争激励与团队激励)以及参与者在实际工作任务结束时收到的反馈。随后,我们测量了参与者的社会价值取向(SVO)(分配偏好的代表)以及对他人社会价值取向的相应信念。在没有反馈的情况下,与计件工资相比,如果参与者受到团队激励,他们会表现出更强的社会价值取向。令人惊讶的是,在没有反馈的竞争激励机制下,这种积极效应依然存在。在有相对绩效反馈的情况下,不同激励方案的溢出效应有所不同。在竞争激励机制下,参与者的 SVO 较低(负溢出效应),但仅限于低绩效者。在团队激励机制下,我们发现对高绩效者的偏好有负溢出效应,而对低绩效者则有正溢出效应。我们没有发现信念溢出效应的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spillovers from incentive schemes on distributional preferences and expectations

In the workplace, incentive schemes may spill over on distributional preferences and beliefs, which underlie an employee’s willingness to cooperate. In an online experiment, we analyze how different incentive schemes and the corresponding feedback affect distributional preferences and beliefs. In six different treatments, we vary the incentive scheme (competitive vs team incentives) for a real-effort task and the feedback participants receive at the end of the real-effort task. Subsequently, we measure participants’ social value orientation (SVO), a proxy for distributional preferences, and the corresponding beliefs about other’s SVO. If no feedback is provided, participants show stronger SVOs if they are incentivized by team incentives in comparison to piece-rate remuneration. Surprisingly, this positive effect prevails under competitive incentives without feedback. With feedback about relative performance, the spillover effects differ between the incentive schemes. Under competitive incentives, participants show lower SVOs (negative spillovers), but only for low performers. Under team incentives, we find negative spillovers on preferences for high performers and positive spillovers for low performers. We find no evidence for spillovers on beliefs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
期刊最新文献
Privacy during pandemics: Attitudes to public use of personal data Understanding inconsistencies in risk attitude elicitation games: Evidence from smallholder farmers in five African countries Inflation expectations in the wake of the war in Ukraine Asking for a friend: Reminders and incentives for crowdfunding college savings ‘Update Bias’: Manipulating past information based on the existing circumstances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1