{"title":"在前交叉韧带重建手术(ERAS)中,比较鞘内高压罗哌卡因和高压布比卡因在增强术后恢复(ERAS)方面的疗效","authors":"N. Panse, Noopur Dasmit Singh, Payoja Narendra Khadpekar, Varun Raj Dubey","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Bupivacaine is the drug of choice in spinal anaesthesia (SA), while Ropivacaine with its comparatively shorter duration of motor block allows early mobilization post ACL reconstruction surgery which is a crucial factor in Early Recovery after Surgery. : In this randomized double-blind comparative study of a total of 60 patients irrespective of gender undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were studied. After Administration of SA to group R (2.5ml of 0.75% Heavy Ropivacaine) & group B (2.5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine) both were compared for their post-operative effects with Bromage score, Aldrete score & Visual Analogue Score. : The time required for complete regression of motor blockade in group R (144.5+26.1 mins) < group B (181±21.3mins) which allowed for early mobilization which over all provides better and faster recovery.: Hyperbaric Ropivacaine when compared to Bupivacaine promises better results in terms of early ambulation and intraoperative hemodynamic stability promoting ERAS in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. Promoting ERAS policy will reduce the duration of hospital stay, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of health services.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of efficacy of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for ACL reconstructions\",\"authors\":\"N. Panse, Noopur Dasmit Singh, Payoja Narendra Khadpekar, Varun Raj Dubey\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Bupivacaine is the drug of choice in spinal anaesthesia (SA), while Ropivacaine with its comparatively shorter duration of motor block allows early mobilization post ACL reconstruction surgery which is a crucial factor in Early Recovery after Surgery. : In this randomized double-blind comparative study of a total of 60 patients irrespective of gender undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were studied. After Administration of SA to group R (2.5ml of 0.75% Heavy Ropivacaine) & group B (2.5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine) both were compared for their post-operative effects with Bromage score, Aldrete score & Visual Analogue Score. : The time required for complete regression of motor blockade in group R (144.5+26.1 mins) < group B (181±21.3mins) which allowed for early mobilization which over all provides better and faster recovery.: Hyperbaric Ropivacaine when compared to Bupivacaine promises better results in terms of early ambulation and intraoperative hemodynamic stability promoting ERAS in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. Promoting ERAS policy will reduce the duration of hospital stay, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of health services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"7 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
:布比卡因是脊髓麻醉(SA)的首选药物,而罗比卡因的运动阻滞持续时间相对较短,可以在前交叉韧带重建手术后尽早活动,这是术后早期恢复的关键因素。 在这项随机双盲对比研究中,共有 60 名患者(不分男女)接受了前交叉韧带重建手术。R 组(2.5 毫升 0.75% 重型罗哌卡因)和 B 组(2.5 毫升 0.5% 布比卡因)在使用 SA 后,通过 Bromage 评分、Aldrete 评分和视觉模拟评分比较两组的术后效果。 R 组运动阻滞完全消退所需时间(144.5+26.1 分钟)< B 组(181±21.3 分钟),这使得患者可以尽早活动,从而更好更快地恢复:与布比卡因相比,高压氧罗哌卡因可使接受前交叉韧带重建手术的患者在早期活动和术中血流动力学稳定方面获得更好的效果,从而促进ERAS。推广 ERAS 政策将缩短住院时间,从而提高医疗服务的成本效益。
Comparison of efficacy of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for ACL reconstructions
: Bupivacaine is the drug of choice in spinal anaesthesia (SA), while Ropivacaine with its comparatively shorter duration of motor block allows early mobilization post ACL reconstruction surgery which is a crucial factor in Early Recovery after Surgery. : In this randomized double-blind comparative study of a total of 60 patients irrespective of gender undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were studied. After Administration of SA to group R (2.5ml of 0.75% Heavy Ropivacaine) & group B (2.5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine) both were compared for their post-operative effects with Bromage score, Aldrete score & Visual Analogue Score. : The time required for complete regression of motor blockade in group R (144.5+26.1 mins) < group B (181±21.3mins) which allowed for early mobilization which over all provides better and faster recovery.: Hyperbaric Ropivacaine when compared to Bupivacaine promises better results in terms of early ambulation and intraoperative hemodynamic stability promoting ERAS in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. Promoting ERAS policy will reduce the duration of hospital stay, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of health services.