前纳卡尔(纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫自治州)和解放区在《马德里原则》中的地位

Stepan Hasan-Jalalyan, Eduard Zohrabyan
{"title":"前纳卡尔(纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫自治州)和解放区在《马德里原则》中的地位","authors":"Stepan Hasan-Jalalyan, Eduard Zohrabyan","doi":"10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i64.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article, based on the sources related to the issue, is to find out the claims against the national and state interests of the Republic of Artsakh in the \"madrid principles\" presented by the OSCE Minsk group to the conflict parties for the purpose of settlement of the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict.                                                 \n         In order to achieve the set goal, the following issues were put forward: 1. what are the main recommendations laid down in the \"madrid principles\" on the basis of which the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict should be settled?, 2. what position did the parties to the conflict have regarding the \"madrid principles\"?, 3. what status would be given to the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region and the liberated territories under the “madrid principles”?, 4. how would the Armenians of Artsakh exercise their right to self-determination with the “madrid principles”?, 5. what was the position of the former presidents of the Republic of Armenia regarding the future status of the Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Region and the liberated territories?     The article is written by means of comparison and comparative study of relevant documents and examination analysis.                                              \nAs a result of the joint examination of facts and documents related to the issue, we came to the conclusion that the document known as \"madrid principles\" presented by the OSCE Minsk group to the conflict parties for the purpose of settlement of the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict is mostly against the national and state interests of the Republic of Artsakh. ","PeriodicalId":516798,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES","volume":"59 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STATUS FORMER NKAR (NAGORNO KARABAKH AUTONOMOUS REGION) AND THE LIBERATED TERRITORIES IN THE MADRID PRINCIPLES\",\"authors\":\"Stepan Hasan-Jalalyan, Eduard Zohrabyan\",\"doi\":\"10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i64.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the article, based on the sources related to the issue, is to find out the claims against the national and state interests of the Republic of Artsakh in the \\\"madrid principles\\\" presented by the OSCE Minsk group to the conflict parties for the purpose of settlement of the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict.                                                 \\n         In order to achieve the set goal, the following issues were put forward: 1. what are the main recommendations laid down in the \\\"madrid principles\\\" on the basis of which the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict should be settled?, 2. what position did the parties to the conflict have regarding the \\\"madrid principles\\\"?, 3. what status would be given to the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region and the liberated territories under the “madrid principles”?, 4. how would the Armenians of Artsakh exercise their right to self-determination with the “madrid principles”?, 5. what was the position of the former presidents of the Republic of Armenia regarding the future status of the Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Region and the liberated territories?     The article is written by means of comparison and comparative study of relevant documents and examination analysis.                                              \\nAs a result of the joint examination of facts and documents related to the issue, we came to the conclusion that the document known as \\\"madrid principles\\\" presented by the OSCE Minsk group to the conflict parties for the purpose of settlement of the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict is mostly against the national and state interests of the Republic of Artsakh. \",\"PeriodicalId\":516798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"59 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i64.95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v1i64.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是根据与该问题有关的资料来源,找出欧安组织明斯克小组为解决阿 塞拜疆-阿尔扎赫冲突而向冲突各方提出的 "马德里原则 "中对阿尔扎赫共和国民族和国 家利益的主张。 为了实现既定目标,提出了以下问题:1. "马德里原则 "中提出的解决阿塞拜疆-阿尔扎 赫冲突的主要建议是什么?2. 冲突各方对 "马德里原则 "持何种立场? 3. 根据 "马德里原则",前纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫自治州和已解放领土将享有何种地 位? 4. 阿尔扎赫的亚美尼亚人将如何根据 "马德里原则 "行使其自决权? 本文通过对相关文件的比较研究和审查分析撰写而成。 在对与该问题有关的事实和文件进行联合审查后,我们得出结论认为,欧安 组织明斯克小组为解决阿塞拜疆-阿尔扎赫冲突而向冲突各方提出的被称为 "马 德里原则 "的文件在很大程度上违背了阿尔扎赫共和国的民族和国家利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STATUS FORMER NKAR (NAGORNO KARABAKH AUTONOMOUS REGION) AND THE LIBERATED TERRITORIES IN THE MADRID PRINCIPLES
The purpose of the article, based on the sources related to the issue, is to find out the claims against the national and state interests of the Republic of Artsakh in the "madrid principles" presented by the OSCE Minsk group to the conflict parties for the purpose of settlement of the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict.                                                          In order to achieve the set goal, the following issues were put forward: 1. what are the main recommendations laid down in the "madrid principles" on the basis of which the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict should be settled?, 2. what position did the parties to the conflict have regarding the "madrid principles"?, 3. what status would be given to the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region and the liberated territories under the “madrid principles”?, 4. how would the Armenians of Artsakh exercise their right to self-determination with the “madrid principles”?, 5. what was the position of the former presidents of the Republic of Armenia regarding the future status of the Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Region and the liberated territories?     The article is written by means of comparison and comparative study of relevant documents and examination analysis.                                              As a result of the joint examination of facts and documents related to the issue, we came to the conclusion that the document known as "madrid principles" presented by the OSCE Minsk group to the conflict parties for the purpose of settlement of the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict is mostly against the national and state interests of the Republic of Artsakh. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE PROBLEMS OF TEACHING THE ADOBE PAGEMAKER SOFTWARE AND THE INCREASE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEARNING BY USING THE COMPARISON METHOD THE STUDY OF THE VOCABULARY IN HOVHANNES TUMANYAN'S POEM “LORETSI SAKON” “CHARENTS’ LAND OF NAIRI AND THE POETICS OF THE CITY IN THE SYMBOLIST NOVEL” STYLISTIC IMPLICATIONS OF USING FOREIGN WORDS IN STORY “THE LOST DOVE” BY NAR-DOS OBSERVATIONS ON ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF HAKOB PARONYAN’S SERIES OF NOVELETTES “HARMS OF POLITENESS”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1