利用分数各向异性(FA)微观结构图寻找深度学习临床敏感性的极限

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Frontiers in Neuroinformatics Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.3389/fninf.2024.1415085
Marta Gaviraghi, Antonio Ricciardi, Fulvia Palesi, Wallace Brownlee, Paolo Vitali, Ferran Prados, B. Kanber, C. G. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
{"title":"利用分数各向异性(FA)微观结构图寻找深度学习临床敏感性的极限","authors":"Marta Gaviraghi, Antonio Ricciardi, Fulvia Palesi, Wallace Brownlee, Paolo Vitali, Ferran Prados, B. Kanber, C. G. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott","doi":"10.3389/fninf.2024.1415085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative maps obtained with diffusion weighted (DW) imaging, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) –calculated by fitting the diffusion tensor (DT) model to the data,—are very useful to study neurological diseases. To fit this map accurately, acquisition times of the order of several minutes are needed because many noncollinear DW volumes must be acquired to reduce directional biases. Deep learning (DL) can be used to reduce acquisition times by reducing the number of DW volumes. We already developed a DL network named “one-minute FA,” which uses 10 DW volumes to obtain FA maps, maintaining the same characteristics and clinical sensitivity of the FA maps calculated with the standard method using more volumes. Recent publications have indicated that it is possible to train DL networks and obtain FA maps even with 4 DW input volumes, far less than the minimum number of directions for the mathematical estimation of the DT.Here we investigated the impact of reducing the number of DW input volumes to 4 or 7, and evaluated the performance and clinical sensitivity of the corresponding DL networks trained to calculate FA, while comparing results also with those using our one-minute FA. Each network training was performed on the human connectome project open-access dataset that has a high resolution and many DW volumes, used to fit a ground truth FA. To evaluate the generalizability of each network, they were tested on two external clinical datasets, not seen during training, and acquired on different scanners with different protocols, as previously done.Using 4 or 7 DW volumes, it was possible to train DL networks to obtain FA maps with the same range of values as ground truth - map, only when using HCP test data; pathological sensitivity was lost when tested using the external clinical datasets: indeed in both cases, no consistent differences were found between patient groups. On the contrary, our “one-minute FA” did not suffer from the same problem.When developing DL networks for reduced acquisition times, the ability to generalize and to generate quantitative biomarkers that provide clinical sensitivity must be addressed.","PeriodicalId":12462,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding the limits of deep learning clinical sensitivity with fractional anisotropy (FA) microstructure maps\",\"authors\":\"Marta Gaviraghi, Antonio Ricciardi, Fulvia Palesi, Wallace Brownlee, Paolo Vitali, Ferran Prados, B. Kanber, C. G. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fninf.2024.1415085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantitative maps obtained with diffusion weighted (DW) imaging, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) –calculated by fitting the diffusion tensor (DT) model to the data,—are very useful to study neurological diseases. To fit this map accurately, acquisition times of the order of several minutes are needed because many noncollinear DW volumes must be acquired to reduce directional biases. Deep learning (DL) can be used to reduce acquisition times by reducing the number of DW volumes. We already developed a DL network named “one-minute FA,” which uses 10 DW volumes to obtain FA maps, maintaining the same characteristics and clinical sensitivity of the FA maps calculated with the standard method using more volumes. Recent publications have indicated that it is possible to train DL networks and obtain FA maps even with 4 DW input volumes, far less than the minimum number of directions for the mathematical estimation of the DT.Here we investigated the impact of reducing the number of DW input volumes to 4 or 7, and evaluated the performance and clinical sensitivity of the corresponding DL networks trained to calculate FA, while comparing results also with those using our one-minute FA. Each network training was performed on the human connectome project open-access dataset that has a high resolution and many DW volumes, used to fit a ground truth FA. To evaluate the generalizability of each network, they were tested on two external clinical datasets, not seen during training, and acquired on different scanners with different protocols, as previously done.Using 4 or 7 DW volumes, it was possible to train DL networks to obtain FA maps with the same range of values as ground truth - map, only when using HCP test data; pathological sensitivity was lost when tested using the external clinical datasets: indeed in both cases, no consistent differences were found between patient groups. On the contrary, our “one-minute FA” did not suffer from the same problem.When developing DL networks for reduced acquisition times, the ability to generalize and to generate quantitative biomarkers that provide clinical sensitivity must be addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2024.1415085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2024.1415085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过扩散加权(DW)成像获得的定量图,如分数各向异性(FA),是通过对数据拟合扩散张量(DT)模型计算得出的,对研究神经系统疾病非常有用。要精确拟合该图谱,需要几分钟的采集时间,因为必须采集许多非共线性的 DW 体积以减少方向偏差。深度学习(DL)可通过减少 DW 卷的数量来缩短采集时间。我们已经开发出一种名为 "一分钟 FA "的深度学习网络,只需 10 个 DW 容积即可获得 FA 图,与使用更多容积的标准方法计算出的 FA 图保持相同的特征和临床灵敏度。最近发表的文章指出,即使只有 4 个 DW 输入容积,也可以训练 DL 网络并获得 FA 图,而这一数字远远低于 DT 数学估计所需的最小方向数。在此,我们研究了将 DW 输入容积数减少到 4 个或 7 个的影响,并评估了相应的 DL 网络在计算 FA 时的性能和临床灵敏度,同时还将结果与使用我们的 "一分钟 FA "的结果进行了比较。每个网络的训练都是在人类连接组项目开放数据集上进行的,该数据集具有高分辨率和大量 DW 容积,用于拟合基本真实 FA。为了评估每个网络的通用性,我们在两个外部临床数据集上对其进行了测试,这两个数据集在训练过程中没有出现过,而且是在不同的扫描仪上以不同的方案获得的,就像之前所做的那样。使用 4 或 7 个 DW 容积,只有在使用 HCP 测试数据时,DL 网络才有可能训练出与基本真实 FA 图具有相同取值范围的 FA 图;而在使用外部临床数据集进行测试时,病理学敏感性就会丧失:事实上,在这两种情况下,都没有发现不同患者组之间存在一致的差异。相反,我们的 "一分钟 FA "却没有出现同样的问题。在开发可缩短采集时间的 DL 网络时,必须解决通用能力和生成可提供临床敏感性的定量生物标志物的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding the limits of deep learning clinical sensitivity with fractional anisotropy (FA) microstructure maps
Quantitative maps obtained with diffusion weighted (DW) imaging, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) –calculated by fitting the diffusion tensor (DT) model to the data,—are very useful to study neurological diseases. To fit this map accurately, acquisition times of the order of several minutes are needed because many noncollinear DW volumes must be acquired to reduce directional biases. Deep learning (DL) can be used to reduce acquisition times by reducing the number of DW volumes. We already developed a DL network named “one-minute FA,” which uses 10 DW volumes to obtain FA maps, maintaining the same characteristics and clinical sensitivity of the FA maps calculated with the standard method using more volumes. Recent publications have indicated that it is possible to train DL networks and obtain FA maps even with 4 DW input volumes, far less than the minimum number of directions for the mathematical estimation of the DT.Here we investigated the impact of reducing the number of DW input volumes to 4 or 7, and evaluated the performance and clinical sensitivity of the corresponding DL networks trained to calculate FA, while comparing results also with those using our one-minute FA. Each network training was performed on the human connectome project open-access dataset that has a high resolution and many DW volumes, used to fit a ground truth FA. To evaluate the generalizability of each network, they were tested on two external clinical datasets, not seen during training, and acquired on different scanners with different protocols, as previously done.Using 4 or 7 DW volumes, it was possible to train DL networks to obtain FA maps with the same range of values as ground truth - map, only when using HCP test data; pathological sensitivity was lost when tested using the external clinical datasets: indeed in both cases, no consistent differences were found between patient groups. On the contrary, our “one-minute FA” did not suffer from the same problem.When developing DL networks for reduced acquisition times, the ability to generalize and to generate quantitative biomarkers that provide clinical sensitivity must be addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroinformatics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on the development and implementation of numerical/computational models and analytical tools used to share, integrate and analyze experimental data and advance theories of the nervous system functions. Specialty Chief Editors Jan G. Bjaalie at the University of Oslo and Sean L. Hill at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide. Neuroscience is being propelled into the information age as the volume of information explodes, demanding organization and synthesis. Novel synthesis approaches are opening up a new dimension for the exploration of the components of brain elements and systems and the vast number of variables that underlie their functions. Neural data is highly heterogeneous with complex inter-relations across multiple levels, driving the need for innovative organizing and synthesizing approaches from genes to cognition, and covering a range of species and disease states. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics therefore welcomes submissions on existing neuroscience databases, development of data and knowledge bases for all levels of neuroscience, applications and technologies that can facilitate data sharing (interoperability, formats, terminologies, and ontologies), and novel tools for data acquisition, analyses, visualization, and dissemination of nervous system data. Our journal welcomes submissions on new tools (software and hardware) that support brain modeling, and the merging of neuroscience databases with brain models used for simulation and visualization.
期刊最新文献
Cooperation objective evaluation in aviation: validation and comparison of two novel approaches in simulated environment The ROSMAP project: aging and neurodegenerative diseases through omic sciences. Reproducible supervised learning-assisted classification of spontaneous synaptic waveforms with Eventer Light-weight neural network for intra-voxel structure analysis Efficient federated learning for distributed neuroimaging data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1