董事会性别多样性、公司生命周期与公司风险承担之间的关系

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS Global Business Review Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1177/09721509241253052
Sajid Mohy Ul Din, Ahmad Adeel, Sheher Yar Khan, Parsa Rani
{"title":"董事会性别多样性、公司生命周期与公司风险承担之间的关系","authors":"Sajid Mohy Ul Din, Ahmad Adeel, Sheher Yar Khan, Parsa Rani","doi":"10.1177/09721509241253052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on corporate risk-taking, moderated by the firm life cycle stages. Data from 200 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2018–2022) were analyzed using the system generalized method of moments. Corporate risk-taking, the dependent, was measured using systematic risk and total-risk proxies. Results showed that board gender diversity had an insignificant effect, firm life cycle had a negative significant impact, while the interaction term (board gender diversity and firm life cycle) showed a positively significant impact on risk-taking measured by total risk. In contrast, both factors, along with their interaction, positively influenced risk-taking when assessed through systematic risk. The study further segmented the firm life cycle into five distinct stages, finding that the impact of board gender diversity on risk-taking varied across stages. For instance, at the introduction and maturity stages, board gender diversity positively affected risk-taking for both proxies. However, at the growth and decline stages, its impact was insignificant. These findings suggest variability in the relationship between board gender diversity and risk-taking, potentially influenced by the choice of risk proxies. Theoretically, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on how a firm’s life cycle and board gender diversity influence corporate risk-taking. This study’s insight also holds significant implications for corporate governance and policymaking because, contrary to popular belief, the findings suggest that board gender diversity does not uniformly reduce risk-taking; instead, its impact varies with the firm’s life cycle stage.","PeriodicalId":47569,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Board Gender Diversity, Firm Life Cycle and Corporate Risk-taking\",\"authors\":\"Sajid Mohy Ul Din, Ahmad Adeel, Sheher Yar Khan, Parsa Rani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09721509241253052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on corporate risk-taking, moderated by the firm life cycle stages. Data from 200 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2018–2022) were analyzed using the system generalized method of moments. Corporate risk-taking, the dependent, was measured using systematic risk and total-risk proxies. Results showed that board gender diversity had an insignificant effect, firm life cycle had a negative significant impact, while the interaction term (board gender diversity and firm life cycle) showed a positively significant impact on risk-taking measured by total risk. In contrast, both factors, along with their interaction, positively influenced risk-taking when assessed through systematic risk. The study further segmented the firm life cycle into five distinct stages, finding that the impact of board gender diversity on risk-taking varied across stages. For instance, at the introduction and maturity stages, board gender diversity positively affected risk-taking for both proxies. However, at the growth and decline stages, its impact was insignificant. These findings suggest variability in the relationship between board gender diversity and risk-taking, potentially influenced by the choice of risk proxies. Theoretically, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on how a firm’s life cycle and board gender diversity influence corporate risk-taking. This study’s insight also holds significant implications for corporate governance and policymaking because, contrary to popular belief, the findings suggest that board gender diversity does not uniformly reduce risk-taking; instead, its impact varies with the firm’s life cycle stage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241253052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241253052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了董事会性别多样性对企业风险承担的影响,并受企业生命周期阶段的调节。研究使用系统广义矩方法分析了在巴基斯坦证券交易所上市的 200 家非金融企业(2018-2022 年)的数据。公司风险承担作为因变量,使用系统风险和总风险代理指标进行衡量。结果显示,董事会性别多样性的影响不显著,公司生命周期的影响为负,而交互项(董事会性别多样性和公司生命周期)对以总风险衡量的风险承担有正向显著影响。相比之下,通过系统风险评估时,这两个因素及其交互作用对风险承担产生了积极影响。研究进一步将企业生命周期划分为五个不同阶段,发现董事会性别多元化对不同阶段风险承担的影响各不相同。例如,在导入期和成熟期,董事会性别多元化对两种代用指标的风险承担都有积极影响。然而,在成长和衰退阶段,其影响并不显著。这些研究结果表明,董事会性别多样性与风险承担之间的关系存在变异,可能受到风险代用指标选择的影响。从理论上讲,本研究为有关企业生命周期和董事会性别多样性如何影响企业风险承担的知识体系做出了贡献。本研究的见解还对公司治理和政策制定具有重要意义,因为与普遍观点相反,研究结果表明,董事会性别多元化并不会一致地减少风险承担;相反,其影响会随着公司的生命周期阶段而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship Between Board Gender Diversity, Firm Life Cycle and Corporate Risk-taking
This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on corporate risk-taking, moderated by the firm life cycle stages. Data from 200 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2018–2022) were analyzed using the system generalized method of moments. Corporate risk-taking, the dependent, was measured using systematic risk and total-risk proxies. Results showed that board gender diversity had an insignificant effect, firm life cycle had a negative significant impact, while the interaction term (board gender diversity and firm life cycle) showed a positively significant impact on risk-taking measured by total risk. In contrast, both factors, along with their interaction, positively influenced risk-taking when assessed through systematic risk. The study further segmented the firm life cycle into five distinct stages, finding that the impact of board gender diversity on risk-taking varied across stages. For instance, at the introduction and maturity stages, board gender diversity positively affected risk-taking for both proxies. However, at the growth and decline stages, its impact was insignificant. These findings suggest variability in the relationship between board gender diversity and risk-taking, potentially influenced by the choice of risk proxies. Theoretically, this study contributes to the body of knowledge on how a firm’s life cycle and board gender diversity influence corporate risk-taking. This study’s insight also holds significant implications for corporate governance and policymaking because, contrary to popular belief, the findings suggest that board gender diversity does not uniformly reduce risk-taking; instead, its impact varies with the firm’s life cycle stage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Global Business Review is designed to be a forum for the wider dissemination of current management and business practice and research drawn from around the globe but with an emphasis on Asian and Indian perspectives. An important feature is its cross-cultural and comparative approach. Multidisciplinary in nature and with a strong practical orientation, this refereed journal publishes surveys relating to and report significant developments in management practice drawn from business/commerce, the public and the private sector, and non-profit organisations. The journal also publishes articles which provide practical insights on doing business in India/Asia from local and global and macro and micro perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Contrasting the Efficacy of the Type of Influencer to the Type of Product: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Authenticity A Study on How Consumer-generated Advertising Influences the Purchase Intention of Online Consumers in C2C Marketplace Brand Personality and Loyalty as Drivers of Repurchase Intentions: Evidence from Pakistani Mobile Phone Users Going Green from Within: The Mediation of Employee Green Creativity in the Relationship Between Green Inclusive Leadership and Green Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Nexus among Blockchain Technology, Digital Accounting Practices, Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Performance: Moderated-mediating Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1