痴呆症风险预测模型有何新进展?最新系统综述

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1159/000539744
Jacob Brain, Aysegul Humeyra Kafadar, Linda Errington, Rachael Kirkley, Eugene Y.H. Tang, R. Akyea, Manpreet Bains, Carol Brayne, Grazziela Figueredo, Leanne Greene, Jennie Louise, Catharine Morgan, Eduwin Pakpahan, David Reeves, Louise Robinson, Amy Salter, Mario Siervo, Phillip J. Tully, Deborah Turnbull, Nadeem Qureshi, Blossom Stephan
{"title":"痴呆症风险预测模型有何新进展?最新系统综述","authors":"Jacob Brain, Aysegul Humeyra Kafadar, Linda Errington, Rachael Kirkley, Eugene Y.H. Tang, R. Akyea, Manpreet Bains, Carol Brayne, Grazziela Figueredo, Leanne Greene, Jennie Louise, Catharine Morgan, Eduwin Pakpahan, David Reeves, Louise Robinson, Amy Salter, Mario Siervo, Phillip J. Tully, Deborah Turnbull, Nadeem Qureshi, Blossom Stephan","doi":"10.1159/000539744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nIdentifying individuals at high risk of dementia is critical to optimized clinical care, formulating effective preventative strategies, and determining eligibility for clinical trials. Since our previous systematic reviews in 2010 and 2015, there has been a surge in dementia risk prediction modelling. The aim of this study is to update our previous reviews to explore, and critically review, new developments in dementia risk modelling.\nMethods\nMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from March 2014 to June 2022. Studies were included if they were population or community-based cohorts (including electronic health record data), had developed a model for predicting late-life incident dementia and included model performance indices such as discrimination, calibration, or external validation.\nResults \nIn total, 9,209 articles were identified from the electronic search, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. We found a substantial increase in the number of new models published from 2014 (>50 new models), including an increase in the number of models developed using machine learning. Over 450 unique predictor (component) variables have been tested. Nineteen studies (26%) undertook external validation of newly developed or existing models, with mixed results. For the first time, models have also been developed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and others validated in racial and ethnic minority groups. \nConclusion\nThe literature on dementia risk prediction modelling is rapidly evolving with new analytical developments and testing in LMICs. However, it is still challenging to make recommendations about which one model is the most suitable for routine use in a clinical setting. There is an urgent need to develop a suitable, robust, validated risk prediction model in the general population that can be widely implemented in clinical practice to improve dementia prevention.","PeriodicalId":38017,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s new in dementia risk prediction modelling? An updated systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Brain, Aysegul Humeyra Kafadar, Linda Errington, Rachael Kirkley, Eugene Y.H. Tang, R. Akyea, Manpreet Bains, Carol Brayne, Grazziela Figueredo, Leanne Greene, Jennie Louise, Catharine Morgan, Eduwin Pakpahan, David Reeves, Louise Robinson, Amy Salter, Mario Siervo, Phillip J. Tully, Deborah Turnbull, Nadeem Qureshi, Blossom Stephan\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction\\nIdentifying individuals at high risk of dementia is critical to optimized clinical care, formulating effective preventative strategies, and determining eligibility for clinical trials. Since our previous systematic reviews in 2010 and 2015, there has been a surge in dementia risk prediction modelling. The aim of this study is to update our previous reviews to explore, and critically review, new developments in dementia risk modelling.\\nMethods\\nMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from March 2014 to June 2022. Studies were included if they were population or community-based cohorts (including electronic health record data), had developed a model for predicting late-life incident dementia and included model performance indices such as discrimination, calibration, or external validation.\\nResults \\nIn total, 9,209 articles were identified from the electronic search, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. We found a substantial increase in the number of new models published from 2014 (>50 new models), including an increase in the number of models developed using machine learning. Over 450 unique predictor (component) variables have been tested. Nineteen studies (26%) undertook external validation of newly developed or existing models, with mixed results. For the first time, models have also been developed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and others validated in racial and ethnic minority groups. \\nConclusion\\nThe literature on dementia risk prediction modelling is rapidly evolving with new analytical developments and testing in LMICs. However, it is still challenging to make recommendations about which one model is the most suitable for routine use in a clinical setting. There is an urgent need to develop a suitable, robust, validated risk prediction model in the general population that can be widely implemented in clinical practice to improve dementia prevention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言识别痴呆症高风险人群对于优化临床护理、制定有效的预防策略以及确定临床试验资格至关重要。自 2010 年和 2015 年的系统性综述以来,痴呆症风险预测模型的研究激增。本研究旨在更新我们之前的综述,探索并批判性地回顾痴呆症风险建模的新进展。方法检索了2014年3月至2022年6月期间的MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science。如果研究是基于人群或社区的队列(包括电子健康记录数据),已开发出预测晚年痴呆症的模型,并包含模型性能指标,如辨别度、校准或外部验证,则被纳入研究。我们发现,2014 年以来发表的新模型数量大幅增加(超过 50 个新模型),包括使用机器学习开发的模型数量增加。超过 450 个独特的预测(成分)变量得到了测试。19项研究(26%)对新开发或现有模型进行了外部验证,结果喜忧参半。此外,还首次在中低收入国家(LMICs)开发了模型,并在少数种族和少数民族群体中验证了其他模型。结论痴呆症风险预测模型的文献随着新分析方法的开发和在低收入国家的测试而迅速发展。然而,要就哪种模型最适合在临床环境中常规使用提出建议仍具有挑战性。当务之急是在普通人群中开发一种合适的、可靠的、经过验证的风险预测模型,并在临床实践中广泛应用,以改善痴呆症的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What’s new in dementia risk prediction modelling? An updated systematic review
Introduction Identifying individuals at high risk of dementia is critical to optimized clinical care, formulating effective preventative strategies, and determining eligibility for clinical trials. Since our previous systematic reviews in 2010 and 2015, there has been a surge in dementia risk prediction modelling. The aim of this study is to update our previous reviews to explore, and critically review, new developments in dementia risk modelling. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from March 2014 to June 2022. Studies were included if they were population or community-based cohorts (including electronic health record data), had developed a model for predicting late-life incident dementia and included model performance indices such as discrimination, calibration, or external validation. Results In total, 9,209 articles were identified from the electronic search, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. We found a substantial increase in the number of new models published from 2014 (>50 new models), including an increase in the number of models developed using machine learning. Over 450 unique predictor (component) variables have been tested. Nineteen studies (26%) undertook external validation of newly developed or existing models, with mixed results. For the first time, models have also been developed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and others validated in racial and ethnic minority groups. Conclusion The literature on dementia risk prediction modelling is rapidly evolving with new analytical developments and testing in LMICs. However, it is still challenging to make recommendations about which one model is the most suitable for routine use in a clinical setting. There is an urgent need to develop a suitable, robust, validated risk prediction model in the general population that can be widely implemented in clinical practice to improve dementia prevention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra .
期刊最新文献
What’s new in dementia risk prediction modelling? An updated systematic review Depressive symptoms are not associated with predementia CSF amyloid pathology The Relation of Sleep Characteristics and Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA). The impact of age-related hearing loss on working memory among older individuals: An event-related potential study Primary microgliopathy presenting as degenerative dementias: A case series of novel gene mutations from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1