{"title":"俄语在向德国人教授波兰语过程中的干扰影响","authors":"Tadeusz Lewaszkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.5689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article I listed, broken down by suitable groups, over 1,600 confirmed interferences of Russian in the process of teaching Polish to Germans. Out of 670 noted word entries, phonetic interferences accounted for 146 entries, morphological interferences for 116 entries, and lexical interferences for 176 entries. As regards graphical interferences, 263 uses of Cyrillic letters (ъ, ы, я, н, б, ч, л) account for some 70 entries, while 163 lexical entries attest to about 300 mistakes such as ɡom ‘dom’ [house], namiętać ‘pamiętać’ [to remember], tożemy ‘możemy’ [we can], napicał ‘napisał’ [he wrote], buł ‘był’ [he was], tytaj ‘tutaj’ [here], kupułem ‘kupiłem’ [I bought (masc.)]. The object of the article included only the interference-caused mistakes I noticed. In fact, there were many more of them.","PeriodicalId":14786,"journal":{"name":"Język. Religia. Tożsamość.","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interferencyjne oddziaływanie języka rosyjskiego w procesie nauczania Niemców języka polskiego\",\"authors\":\"Tadeusz Lewaszkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0054.5689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article I listed, broken down by suitable groups, over 1,600 confirmed interferences of Russian in the process of teaching Polish to Germans. Out of 670 noted word entries, phonetic interferences accounted for 146 entries, morphological interferences for 116 entries, and lexical interferences for 176 entries. As regards graphical interferences, 263 uses of Cyrillic letters (ъ, ы, я, н, б, ч, л) account for some 70 entries, while 163 lexical entries attest to about 300 mistakes such as ɡom ‘dom’ [house], namiętać ‘pamiętać’ [to remember], tożemy ‘możemy’ [we can], napicał ‘napisał’ [he wrote], buł ‘był’ [he was], tytaj ‘tutaj’ [here], kupułem ‘kupiłem’ [I bought (masc.)]. The object of the article included only the interference-caused mistakes I noticed. In fact, there were many more of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Język. Religia. Tożsamość.\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Język. Religia. Tożsamość.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.5689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Język. Religia. Tożsamość.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.5689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interferencyjne oddziaływanie języka rosyjskiego w procesie nauczania Niemców języka polskiego
In the article I listed, broken down by suitable groups, over 1,600 confirmed interferences of Russian in the process of teaching Polish to Germans. Out of 670 noted word entries, phonetic interferences accounted for 146 entries, morphological interferences for 116 entries, and lexical interferences for 176 entries. As regards graphical interferences, 263 uses of Cyrillic letters (ъ, ы, я, н, б, ч, л) account for some 70 entries, while 163 lexical entries attest to about 300 mistakes such as ɡom ‘dom’ [house], namiętać ‘pamiętać’ [to remember], tożemy ‘możemy’ [we can], napicał ‘napisał’ [he wrote], buł ‘był’ [he was], tytaj ‘tutaj’ [here], kupułem ‘kupiłem’ [I bought (masc.)]. The object of the article included only the interference-caused mistakes I noticed. In fact, there were many more of them.