膝关节置换术前用剪子脱毛和微生物定植:随机对照试验

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100377
Trine Herskind Hasløv , Cecilie Fuglsbjerg , Anne Kirstine Nielsen , Anne Brun Hesselvig , Blaine Gabriel Fritz , Lene Bay , Tom Møller , Thomas Bjarnsholt , Anders Odgaard
{"title":"膝关节置换术前用剪子脱毛和微生物定植:随机对照试验","authors":"Trine Herskind Hasløv ,&nbsp;Cecilie Fuglsbjerg ,&nbsp;Anne Kirstine Nielsen ,&nbsp;Anne Brun Hesselvig ,&nbsp;Blaine Gabriel Fritz ,&nbsp;Lene Bay ,&nbsp;Tom Møller ,&nbsp;Thomas Bjarnsholt ,&nbsp;Anders Odgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the widely reported success of knee arthroplasty, studies show that 1.6–3 % of patients undergo revision within the first postoperative year predominantly due to infection. Preoperative skin preparation may potentially decrease the bacterial load and consequently, the risk of periprosthetic joint infections. The effects of hair removal on prosthetic joint infection are inconsistent. Our primary aim was to investigate if hair removal with a clipper influenced skin colonisation and bacterial composition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty Caucasian male participants who were planned to undergo knee arthroplasty, (mean age 63.8 years), were included. Patients were randomised to hair removal in a within-person study design. As a control, the opposite leg of the patient was used. Swabs were collected prior to hair removal (baseline), immediately after hair removal (Day 0), and with follow-up after one and seven days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intervention showed significant decrease in mean log colony-forming units per. cm<sup>2</sup> from baseline 2.97 to 2.67 (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01) immediately after hair removal and sustained at Day 1 (<em>P</em>=0.01). At Day 7, the mean was non-significant compared to baseline. The control group did not show any decrease of skin microbiota at follow-up on Day 0, 1 or 7.</p><p>No significant differences within the bacterial composition were found between the intervention and control leg at baseline among the six most prevalent detected bacterial species: <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus, S</em>. <em>hominis, S</em>. <em>capitis, S</em>. <em>haemolyticus and S</em>. <em>aureus.</em> The study did not find any changes in the bacterial composition over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hair removal with a clipper within 24 hours prior to surgery causes a significant non-selective reduction in skin colonisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000416/pdfft?md5=9b309d3013575d9996c87595086c470c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000416-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hair removal with a clipper and microbial colonisation prior to knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Trine Herskind Hasløv ,&nbsp;Cecilie Fuglsbjerg ,&nbsp;Anne Kirstine Nielsen ,&nbsp;Anne Brun Hesselvig ,&nbsp;Blaine Gabriel Fritz ,&nbsp;Lene Bay ,&nbsp;Tom Møller ,&nbsp;Thomas Bjarnsholt ,&nbsp;Anders Odgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the widely reported success of knee arthroplasty, studies show that 1.6–3 % of patients undergo revision within the first postoperative year predominantly due to infection. Preoperative skin preparation may potentially decrease the bacterial load and consequently, the risk of periprosthetic joint infections. The effects of hair removal on prosthetic joint infection are inconsistent. Our primary aim was to investigate if hair removal with a clipper influenced skin colonisation and bacterial composition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty Caucasian male participants who were planned to undergo knee arthroplasty, (mean age 63.8 years), were included. Patients were randomised to hair removal in a within-person study design. As a control, the opposite leg of the patient was used. Swabs were collected prior to hair removal (baseline), immediately after hair removal (Day 0), and with follow-up after one and seven days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intervention showed significant decrease in mean log colony-forming units per. cm<sup>2</sup> from baseline 2.97 to 2.67 (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01) immediately after hair removal and sustained at Day 1 (<em>P</em>=0.01). At Day 7, the mean was non-significant compared to baseline. The control group did not show any decrease of skin microbiota at follow-up on Day 0, 1 or 7.</p><p>No significant differences within the bacterial composition were found between the intervention and control leg at baseline among the six most prevalent detected bacterial species: <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus, S</em>. <em>hominis, S</em>. <em>capitis, S</em>. <em>haemolyticus and S</em>. <em>aureus.</em> The study did not find any changes in the bacterial composition over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hair removal with a clipper within 24 hours prior to surgery causes a significant non-selective reduction in skin colonisation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000416/pdfft?md5=9b309d3013575d9996c87595086c470c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000416-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管膝关节置换术的成功已被广泛报道,但研究表明,1.6%-3%的患者在术后第一年内主要因感染而进行翻修。术前皮肤准备可能会减少细菌负荷,从而降低假体周围关节感染的风险。脱毛对假体关节感染的影响并不一致。我们的主要目的是研究用剪子脱毛是否会影响皮肤定植和细菌组成。方法纳入 40 名计划接受膝关节置换术的白种男性患者(平均年龄 63.8 岁)。在人内研究设计中,患者被随机安排脱毛。对照组使用患者的对侧腿部。脱毛前(基线)、脱毛后(第 0 天)立即收集拭子,并在 1 天和 7 天后进行随访。结果干预显示,脱毛后,每平方厘米平均菌落形成对数单位从基线 2.97 显著降至 2.67(P<0.01),并在第 1 天持续下降(P=0.01)。在第 7 天,平均值与基线相比没有显著变化。在第 0 天、第 1 天或第 7 天的随访中,对照组的皮肤微生物群没有出现任何减少。在基线时,干预组和对照组腿部的细菌组成在检测到的六种最常见细菌中没有发现明显差异:表皮葡萄球菌、黄体小球菌、人葡萄球菌、头癣葡萄球菌、溶血性葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。结论:在手术前 24 小时内用剪子拔除头发会导致皮肤定植的非选择性显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hair removal with a clipper and microbial colonisation prior to knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Despite the widely reported success of knee arthroplasty, studies show that 1.6–3 % of patients undergo revision within the first postoperative year predominantly due to infection. Preoperative skin preparation may potentially decrease the bacterial load and consequently, the risk of periprosthetic joint infections. The effects of hair removal on prosthetic joint infection are inconsistent. Our primary aim was to investigate if hair removal with a clipper influenced skin colonisation and bacterial composition.

Methods

Forty Caucasian male participants who were planned to undergo knee arthroplasty, (mean age 63.8 years), were included. Patients were randomised to hair removal in a within-person study design. As a control, the opposite leg of the patient was used. Swabs were collected prior to hair removal (baseline), immediately after hair removal (Day 0), and with follow-up after one and seven days.

Results

The intervention showed significant decrease in mean log colony-forming units per. cm2 from baseline 2.97 to 2.67 (P<0.01) immediately after hair removal and sustained at Day 1 (P=0.01). At Day 7, the mean was non-significant compared to baseline. The control group did not show any decrease of skin microbiota at follow-up on Day 0, 1 or 7.

No significant differences within the bacterial composition were found between the intervention and control leg at baseline among the six most prevalent detected bacterial species: Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus, S. hominis, S. capitis, S. haemolyticus and S. aureus. The study did not find any changes in the bacterial composition over time.

Conclusion

Hair removal with a clipper within 24 hours prior to surgery causes a significant non-selective reduction in skin colonisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina Assessing the state of infection prevention and control in cameroon: a cross-sectional workshop evaluation using socioecological models ‘The Law of Unintended Consequences’ – Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection complicating peripheral intravascular cannulation in an epilepsy monitoring unit Susceptibility patterns of Candida species collected from intensive care units in Portugal: a prospective study in 2020–2022 Successful control of an outbreak of Panton–Valentine leucocidin positive meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a National Burns Unit through early detection by whole genome sequencing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1