为马卡罗内西亚作为一个生物地理区域的实体辩护。

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1111/brv.13112
José María Fernández-Palacios, Rüdiger Otto, Jorge Capelo, Juli Caujapé-Castells, Lea de Nascimento, Maria Cristina Duarte, Rui B. Elias, Carlos García-Verdugo, Miguel Menezes de Sequeira, Frédéric Médail, Agustín Naranjo-Cigala, Jairo Patiño, Jonathan Price, Maria M. Romeiras, Lázaro Sánchez-Pinto, Robert J. Whittaker
{"title":"为马卡罗内西亚作为一个生物地理区域的实体辩护。","authors":"José María Fernández-Palacios,&nbsp;Rüdiger Otto,&nbsp;Jorge Capelo,&nbsp;Juli Caujapé-Castells,&nbsp;Lea de Nascimento,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Duarte,&nbsp;Rui B. Elias,&nbsp;Carlos García-Verdugo,&nbsp;Miguel Menezes de Sequeira,&nbsp;Frédéric Médail,&nbsp;Agustín Naranjo-Cigala,&nbsp;Jairo Patiño,&nbsp;Jonathan Price,&nbsp;Maria M. Romeiras,&nbsp;Lázaro Sánchez-Pinto,&nbsp;Robert J. Whittaker","doi":"10.1111/brv.13112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since its coinage <i>ca</i>. 1850 AD by Philip Barker Webb, the biogeographical region of Macaronesia, consisting of the North Atlantic volcanic archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira with the tiny Selvagens, the Canaries and Cabo Verde, and for some authors different continental coastal strips, has been under dispute. Herein, after a brief introduction on the terminology and purpose of regionalism, we recover the origins of the Macaronesia name, concept and geographical adscription, as well as its biogeographical implications and how different authors have positioned themselves, using distinct terrestrial or marine floristic and/or faunistic taxa distributions and relationships for accepting or rejecting the existence of this biogeographical region. Four main issues related to Macaronesia are thoroughly discussed: (<i>i</i>) its independence from the Mediterranean phytogeographical region; (<i>ii</i>) discrepancies according to different taxa analysed; (<i>iii</i>) its geographical limits and the role of the continental enclave(s), and, (<i>iv</i>) the validity of the phytogeographical region level. We conclude that Macaronesia has its own identity and a sound phytogeographical foundation, and that this is mainly based on three different floristic components that are shared by the Macaronesian core (Madeira and the Canaries) and the outermost archipelagos (Azores and Cabo Verde). These floristic components are: (<i>i</i>) the Palaeotropical-Tethyan Geoflora, formerly much more widely distributed in Europe and North Africa and currently restricted to the three northern archipelagos (the Azores, Madeira and the Canaries); (<i>ii</i>) the African Rand Flora, still extant in the coastal margins of Africa and Arabia, and present in the southern archipelagos (Madeira, the Canaries and Cabo Verde), and (<i>iii</i>) the Macaronesian neoendemic floristic component, represented in all the archipelagos, a result of allopatric diversification promoted by isolation of Mediterranean ancestors that manage to colonize Central Macaronesia and, from there, the outer archipelagos. Finally, a differentiating floristic component recently colonized the different archipelagos from the nearest continental coast, providing them with different biogeographic flavours.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 6","pages":"2060-2081"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In defence of the entity of Macaronesia as a biogeographical region\",\"authors\":\"José María Fernández-Palacios,&nbsp;Rüdiger Otto,&nbsp;Jorge Capelo,&nbsp;Juli Caujapé-Castells,&nbsp;Lea de Nascimento,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Duarte,&nbsp;Rui B. Elias,&nbsp;Carlos García-Verdugo,&nbsp;Miguel Menezes de Sequeira,&nbsp;Frédéric Médail,&nbsp;Agustín Naranjo-Cigala,&nbsp;Jairo Patiño,&nbsp;Jonathan Price,&nbsp;Maria M. Romeiras,&nbsp;Lázaro Sánchez-Pinto,&nbsp;Robert J. Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.13112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Since its coinage <i>ca</i>. 1850 AD by Philip Barker Webb, the biogeographical region of Macaronesia, consisting of the North Atlantic volcanic archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira with the tiny Selvagens, the Canaries and Cabo Verde, and for some authors different continental coastal strips, has been under dispute. Herein, after a brief introduction on the terminology and purpose of regionalism, we recover the origins of the Macaronesia name, concept and geographical adscription, as well as its biogeographical implications and how different authors have positioned themselves, using distinct terrestrial or marine floristic and/or faunistic taxa distributions and relationships for accepting or rejecting the existence of this biogeographical region. Four main issues related to Macaronesia are thoroughly discussed: (<i>i</i>) its independence from the Mediterranean phytogeographical region; (<i>ii</i>) discrepancies according to different taxa analysed; (<i>iii</i>) its geographical limits and the role of the continental enclave(s), and, (<i>iv</i>) the validity of the phytogeographical region level. We conclude that Macaronesia has its own identity and a sound phytogeographical foundation, and that this is mainly based on three different floristic components that are shared by the Macaronesian core (Madeira and the Canaries) and the outermost archipelagos (Azores and Cabo Verde). These floristic components are: (<i>i</i>) the Palaeotropical-Tethyan Geoflora, formerly much more widely distributed in Europe and North Africa and currently restricted to the three northern archipelagos (the Azores, Madeira and the Canaries); (<i>ii</i>) the African Rand Flora, still extant in the coastal margins of Africa and Arabia, and present in the southern archipelagos (Madeira, the Canaries and Cabo Verde), and (<i>iii</i>) the Macaronesian neoendemic floristic component, represented in all the archipelagos, a result of allopatric diversification promoted by isolation of Mediterranean ancestors that manage to colonize Central Macaronesia and, from there, the outer archipelagos. Finally, a differentiating floristic component recently colonized the different archipelagos from the nearest continental coast, providing them with different biogeographic flavours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"99 6\",\"pages\":\"2060-2081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13112\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13112\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自公元 1850 年菲利普-巴克-韦伯(Philip Barker Webb)发行硬币以来,马卡罗内西亚(Macaronesia)这一生物地理区域就一直被认为是北大西洋的火山群岛。马卡罗内西亚的生物地理区域由北大西洋火山群岛亚速尔群岛、马德拉群岛和小塞尔瓦根群岛、加那利群岛和佛得角群岛组成,还有一些作者认为是不同的大陆沿海地带。在此,在简要介绍了区域主义的术语和目的之后,我们将恢复马卡罗内西亚名称、概念和地理描述的起源,以及其生物地理学意义和不同作者如何利用独特的陆地或海洋植物和/或动物分类群分布和关系来接受或拒绝这一生物地理区域的存在。我们深入讨论了与马卡罗内西亚有关的四个主要问题:(i) 其与地中海植物地理区域的独立性;(ii) 所分析的不同类群之间的差异;(iii) 其地理界限和大陆飞地的作用,以及 (iv) 植物地理区域级别的有效性。我们的结论是,马卡罗内西亚有其自身的特征和良好的植物地理学基础,这主要基于马卡罗内西亚核心区(马德拉岛和加那利群岛)和最外围群岛(亚速尔群岛和佛得角群岛)共有的三个不同的植物成分。这些植物成分是(i) 古热带-泰西岩地植物区系,以前在欧洲和北非分布更广,目前仅限于北部三 个群岛(亚速尔群岛、马德拉群岛和加那利群岛);(iii) 马卡罗内西亚新特有植物群,在所有群岛中都有分布,这是地中海祖先在与世隔绝的情况下,在马卡罗内西亚中部以及从那里到外围群岛进行异地分化的结果。最后,最近从最近的大陆海岸移居到不同群岛的植物成分也各不相同,使这些群岛具有不同的生物地理特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In defence of the entity of Macaronesia as a biogeographical region

Since its coinage ca. 1850 AD by Philip Barker Webb, the biogeographical region of Macaronesia, consisting of the North Atlantic volcanic archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira with the tiny Selvagens, the Canaries and Cabo Verde, and for some authors different continental coastal strips, has been under dispute. Herein, after a brief introduction on the terminology and purpose of regionalism, we recover the origins of the Macaronesia name, concept and geographical adscription, as well as its biogeographical implications and how different authors have positioned themselves, using distinct terrestrial or marine floristic and/or faunistic taxa distributions and relationships for accepting or rejecting the existence of this biogeographical region. Four main issues related to Macaronesia are thoroughly discussed: (i) its independence from the Mediterranean phytogeographical region; (ii) discrepancies according to different taxa analysed; (iii) its geographical limits and the role of the continental enclave(s), and, (iv) the validity of the phytogeographical region level. We conclude that Macaronesia has its own identity and a sound phytogeographical foundation, and that this is mainly based on three different floristic components that are shared by the Macaronesian core (Madeira and the Canaries) and the outermost archipelagos (Azores and Cabo Verde). These floristic components are: (i) the Palaeotropical-Tethyan Geoflora, formerly much more widely distributed in Europe and North Africa and currently restricted to the three northern archipelagos (the Azores, Madeira and the Canaries); (ii) the African Rand Flora, still extant in the coastal margins of Africa and Arabia, and present in the southern archipelagos (Madeira, the Canaries and Cabo Verde), and (iii) the Macaronesian neoendemic floristic component, represented in all the archipelagos, a result of allopatric diversification promoted by isolation of Mediterranean ancestors that manage to colonize Central Macaronesia and, from there, the outer archipelagos. Finally, a differentiating floristic component recently colonized the different archipelagos from the nearest continental coast, providing them with different biogeographic flavours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
期刊最新文献
Towards ecosystem-based techniques for tipping point detection. Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion. Testosterone mediates life-history trade-offs in female mammals. Zooming in the plastisphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-plastic interactions in aquatic ecosystems. Archaeocytes in sponges: simple cells of complicated fate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1