建立 "TELLme"--一个在线平台,用于对医学本科课程的知识掌握情况进行自主形成性评估。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2362896
Julius Josef Kaminski, Anne Franz, Ylva Holzhausen, Hans Hellfried Wedenig, Fabrice Sporn, Harm Peters
{"title":"建立 \"TELLme\"--一个在线平台,用于对医学本科课程的知识掌握情况进行自主形成性评估。","authors":"Julius Josef Kaminski, Anne Franz, Ylva Holzhausen, Hans Hellfried Wedenig, Fabrice Sporn, Harm Peters","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2362896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to report on the design, implementation, use and evaluation of TELLme, an online platform with annotated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for formative assessment of knowledge acquisition covering an entire undergraduate medical curriculum.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used the Educational Design Research (EDR) framework to develop TELLme as an online platform with 24/7 access for students in a co-creation process between educators, faculty and students. EDR cycle 1 focused on prototyping, while EDR cycle 2 focused on upscaling, usage analysis and evaluation. Database entries were analysed for TELLme usage. Online surveys evaluated platform usability and support for student learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of EDR cycle 2, TELLme contained 6,713 fully annotated MCQs aligned with the cognitive learning objectives of the curriculum. Up to 600 students per day used TELLme to self-assess their knowledge, answering 3,168,622 MCQs in two semesters. Surveys indicated good usability of TELLme, 75% of students indicated that TELLme helped them to identify knowledge gaps, and 72% agreed that TELLme supported their learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students use TELLme extensively to formatively assess their learning in a self-directed manner across the entire curriculum. TELLme aligns with the existing summative and formative system of assessment of the study programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing TELLme - an online platform for self-directed, formative assessment of knowledge acquisition across an undergraduate medical curriculum.\",\"authors\":\"Julius Josef Kaminski, Anne Franz, Ylva Holzhausen, Hans Hellfried Wedenig, Fabrice Sporn, Harm Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2362896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to report on the design, implementation, use and evaluation of TELLme, an online platform with annotated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for formative assessment of knowledge acquisition covering an entire undergraduate medical curriculum.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used the Educational Design Research (EDR) framework to develop TELLme as an online platform with 24/7 access for students in a co-creation process between educators, faculty and students. EDR cycle 1 focused on prototyping, while EDR cycle 2 focused on upscaling, usage analysis and evaluation. Database entries were analysed for TELLme usage. Online surveys evaluated platform usability and support for student learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of EDR cycle 2, TELLme contained 6,713 fully annotated MCQs aligned with the cognitive learning objectives of the curriculum. Up to 600 students per day used TELLme to self-assess their knowledge, answering 3,168,622 MCQs in two semesters. Surveys indicated good usability of TELLme, 75% of students indicated that TELLme helped them to identify knowledge gaps, and 72% agreed that TELLme supported their learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students use TELLme extensively to formatively assess their learning in a self-directed manner across the entire curriculum. TELLme aligns with the existing summative and formative system of assessment of the study programme.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2362896\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2362896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在报告TELLme的设计、实施、使用和评估情况,TELLme是一个在线平台,带有注释选择题(MCQ),用于对整个医学本科课程的知识掌握情况进行形成性评估:我们采用教育设计研究(EDR)框架,在教育工作者、教师和学生的共同创造过程中开发了TELLme在线平台,学生可全天候访问该平台。EDR 周期 1 侧重于原型设计,EDR 周期 2 侧重于升级、使用分析和评估。数据库条目分析了 TELLme 的使用情况。在线调查评估了平台的可用性和对学生学习的支持:在 EDR 周期 2 结束时,TELLme 包含 6,713 个完全注释的 MCQ,与课程的认知学习目标相一致。在两个学期中,每天有多达 600 名学生使用 TELLme 对其知识进行自我评估,共回答了 3,168,622 个 MCQ。调查显示 TELLme 具有良好的可用性,75% 的学生表示 TELLme 帮助他们找出知识差距,72% 的学生认为 TELLme 支持他们的学习:结论:医学生广泛使用 TELLme,在整个课程中以自我导向的方式对学习进行形成性评估。TELLme 与学习课程现有的终结性和形成性评估系统相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing TELLme - an online platform for self-directed, formative assessment of knowledge acquisition across an undergraduate medical curriculum.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report on the design, implementation, use and evaluation of TELLme, an online platform with annotated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for formative assessment of knowledge acquisition covering an entire undergraduate medical curriculum.

Materials and methods: We used the Educational Design Research (EDR) framework to develop TELLme as an online platform with 24/7 access for students in a co-creation process between educators, faculty and students. EDR cycle 1 focused on prototyping, while EDR cycle 2 focused on upscaling, usage analysis and evaluation. Database entries were analysed for TELLme usage. Online surveys evaluated platform usability and support for student learning.

Results: At the end of EDR cycle 2, TELLme contained 6,713 fully annotated MCQs aligned with the cognitive learning objectives of the curriculum. Up to 600 students per day used TELLme to self-assess their knowledge, answering 3,168,622 MCQs in two semesters. Surveys indicated good usability of TELLme, 75% of students indicated that TELLme helped them to identify knowledge gaps, and 72% agreed that TELLme supported their learning.

Conclusions: Medical students use TELLme extensively to formatively assess their learning in a self-directed manner across the entire curriculum. TELLme aligns with the existing summative and formative system of assessment of the study programme.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Integration of behavioral, social, and humanities sciences into healthcare and education and their alignment with medical education programs. Submitting artificial intelligence in health professions education papers to medical teacher. Transformative power of an early ICU internship: A reflection from our undergraduate medical students. Medical education challenges in Mainland China: An analysis of the application of problem-based learning. Transforming remediation for competency-based medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1