重建参数对第一代光子计数探测器 CT 心肌细胞外容积量化准确性的影响。

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7
Chiara Gnasso, Daniel Pinos, U Joseph Schoepf, Milan Vecsey-Nagy, Gilberto J Aquino, Nicola Fink, Emese Zsarnoczay, Robert J Holtackers, Jonathan Stock, Pal Suranyi, Akos Varga-Szemes, Tilman Emrich
{"title":"重建参数对第一代光子计数探测器 CT 心肌细胞外容积量化准确性的影响。","authors":"Chiara Gnasso, Daniel Pinos, U Joseph Schoepf, Milan Vecsey-Nagy, Gilberto J Aquino, Nicola Fink, Emese Zsarnoczay, Robert J Holtackers, Jonathan Stock, Pal Suranyi, Akos Varga-Szemes, Tilman Emrich","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential role of cardiac computed tomography (CT) has increasingly been demonstrated for the assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis through the quantification of extracellular volume (ECV). Photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT technology may deliver more accurate ECV quantification compared to energy-integrating detector CT. We evaluated the impact of reconstruction settings on the accuracy of ECV quantification using PCD-CT, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based ECV as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc analysis, 27 patients (aged 53.1 ± 17.2 years (mean ± standard deviation); 14 women) underwent same-day cardiac PCD-CT and MRI. Late iodine CT scans were reconstructed with different quantum iterative reconstruction levels (QIR 1-4), slice thicknesses (0.4-8 mm), and virtual monoenergetic imaging levels (VMI, 40-90 keV); ECV was quantified for each reconstruction setting. Repeated measures ANOVA and t-test for pairwise comparisons, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECV values did not differ significantly among QIR levels (p = 1.000). A significant difference was observed throughout different slice thicknesses, with 0.4 mm yielding the highest agreement with MRI-based ECV (CCC = 0.944); 45-keV VMI reconstructions showed the lowest mean bias (0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.1-1.4) compared to MRI. Using the most optimal reconstruction settings (QIR4. slice thickness 0.4 mm, VMI 45 keV), a 63% reduction in mean bias and a 6% increase in concordance with MRI-based ECV were achieved compared to standard settings (QIR3, slice thickness 1.5 mm; VMI 65 keV).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selection of appropriate reconstruction parameters improved the agreement between PCD-CT and MRI-based ECV.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Tailoring PCD-CT reconstruction parameters optimizes ECV quantification compared to MRI, potentially improving its clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• CT is increasingly promising for myocardial tissue characterization, assessing focal and diffuse fibrosis via late iodine enhancement and ECV quantification, respectively. • PCD-CT offers superior performance over conventional CT, potentially improving ECV quantification and its agreement with MRI-based ECV. • Tailoring PCD-CT reconstruction parameters optimizes ECV quantification compared to MRI, potentially improving its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of reconstruction parameters on the accuracy of myocardial extracellular volume quantification on a first-generation, photon-counting detector CT.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Gnasso, Daniel Pinos, U Joseph Schoepf, Milan Vecsey-Nagy, Gilberto J Aquino, Nicola Fink, Emese Zsarnoczay, Robert J Holtackers, Jonathan Stock, Pal Suranyi, Akos Varga-Szemes, Tilman Emrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential role of cardiac computed tomography (CT) has increasingly been demonstrated for the assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis through the quantification of extracellular volume (ECV). Photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT technology may deliver more accurate ECV quantification compared to energy-integrating detector CT. We evaluated the impact of reconstruction settings on the accuracy of ECV quantification using PCD-CT, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based ECV as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc analysis, 27 patients (aged 53.1 ± 17.2 years (mean ± standard deviation); 14 women) underwent same-day cardiac PCD-CT and MRI. Late iodine CT scans were reconstructed with different quantum iterative reconstruction levels (QIR 1-4), slice thicknesses (0.4-8 mm), and virtual monoenergetic imaging levels (VMI, 40-90 keV); ECV was quantified for each reconstruction setting. Repeated measures ANOVA and t-test for pairwise comparisons, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECV values did not differ significantly among QIR levels (p = 1.000). A significant difference was observed throughout different slice thicknesses, with 0.4 mm yielding the highest agreement with MRI-based ECV (CCC = 0.944); 45-keV VMI reconstructions showed the lowest mean bias (0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.1-1.4) compared to MRI. Using the most optimal reconstruction settings (QIR4. slice thickness 0.4 mm, VMI 45 keV), a 63% reduction in mean bias and a 6% increase in concordance with MRI-based ECV were achieved compared to standard settings (QIR3, slice thickness 1.5 mm; VMI 65 keV).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selection of appropriate reconstruction parameters improved the agreement between PCD-CT and MRI-based ECV.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Tailoring PCD-CT reconstruction parameters optimizes ECV quantification compared to MRI, potentially improving its clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• CT is increasingly promising for myocardial tissue characterization, assessing focal and diffuse fibrosis via late iodine enhancement and ECV quantification, respectively. • PCD-CT offers superior performance over conventional CT, potentially improving ECV quantification and its agreement with MRI-based ECV. • Tailoring PCD-CT reconstruction parameters optimizes ECV quantification compared to MRI, potentially improving its clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology Experimental\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)在通过量化细胞外容积(ECV)评估弥漫性心肌纤维化方面的潜在作用已日益得到证实。与能量积分探测器 CT 相比,光子计数探测器 (PCD) -CT 技术可提供更准确的 ECV 定量。我们以基于磁共振成像(MRI)的 ECV 为参照,评估了重建设置对 PCD-CT ECV 定量准确性的影响:在这项事后分析中,27 名患者(年龄为 53.1 ± 17.2 岁(平均 ± 标准差);14 名女性)在同一天接受了心脏 PCD-CT 和 MRI 检查。晚期碘 CT 扫描采用不同的量子迭代重建级别(QIR 1-4)、切片厚度(0.4-8 毫米)和虚拟单能成像级别(VMI,40-90 千伏)进行重建;对每种重建设置的 ECV 进行量化。采用重复测量方差分析和 t 检验进行配对比较、布兰-阿尔特曼图和林氏一致性相关系数(CCC):不同 QIR 水平的 ECV 值差异不大(p = 1.000)。不同切片厚度的 ECV 值差异明显,其中 0.4 mm 与 MRI ECV 值的一致性最高(CCC = 0.944);与 MRI 相比,45-keV VMI 重建的平均偏差最小(0.6,95% 置信区间 0.1-1.4)。与标准设置(QIR3,切片厚度 1.5 mm;VMI 65 keV)相比,使用最理想的重建设置(QIR4,切片厚度 0.4 mm;VMI 45 keV),平均偏差减少了 63%,与基于 MRI 的 ECV 的一致性提高了 6%:结论:选择适当的重建参数可提高 PCD-CT 和基于 MRI 的心血管动态图像之间的一致性:与磁共振成像相比,定制 PCD-CT 重建参数可优化 ECV 定量,从而提高其临床实用性:- CT在心肌组织特征描述方面的应用前景越来越广,可分别通过晚期碘增强和ECV量化评估局灶性和弥漫性纤维化。- PCD-CT 比传统 CT 性能更优越,有可能改善 ECV 定量及其与基于 MRI 的 ECV 的一致性。- 与磁共振成像相比,定制 PCD-CT 重建参数可优化 ECV 定量,从而提高其临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of reconstruction parameters on the accuracy of myocardial extracellular volume quantification on a first-generation, photon-counting detector CT.

Background: The potential role of cardiac computed tomography (CT) has increasingly been demonstrated for the assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis through the quantification of extracellular volume (ECV). Photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT technology may deliver more accurate ECV quantification compared to energy-integrating detector CT. We evaluated the impact of reconstruction settings on the accuracy of ECV quantification using PCD-CT, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based ECV as reference.

Methods: In this post hoc analysis, 27 patients (aged 53.1 ± 17.2 years (mean ± standard deviation); 14 women) underwent same-day cardiac PCD-CT and MRI. Late iodine CT scans were reconstructed with different quantum iterative reconstruction levels (QIR 1-4), slice thicknesses (0.4-8 mm), and virtual monoenergetic imaging levels (VMI, 40-90 keV); ECV was quantified for each reconstruction setting. Repeated measures ANOVA and t-test for pairwise comparisons, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used.

Results: ECV values did not differ significantly among QIR levels (p = 1.000). A significant difference was observed throughout different slice thicknesses, with 0.4 mm yielding the highest agreement with MRI-based ECV (CCC = 0.944); 45-keV VMI reconstructions showed the lowest mean bias (0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.1-1.4) compared to MRI. Using the most optimal reconstruction settings (QIR4. slice thickness 0.4 mm, VMI 45 keV), a 63% reduction in mean bias and a 6% increase in concordance with MRI-based ECV were achieved compared to standard settings (QIR3, slice thickness 1.5 mm; VMI 65 keV).

Conclusions: The selection of appropriate reconstruction parameters improved the agreement between PCD-CT and MRI-based ECV.

Relevance statement: Tailoring PCD-CT reconstruction parameters optimizes ECV quantification compared to MRI, potentially improving its clinical utility.

Key points: • CT is increasingly promising for myocardial tissue characterization, assessing focal and diffuse fibrosis via late iodine enhancement and ECV quantification, respectively. • PCD-CT offers superior performance over conventional CT, potentially improving ECV quantification and its agreement with MRI-based ECV. • Tailoring PCD-CT reconstruction parameters optimizes ECV quantification compared to MRI, potentially improving its clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dark-field radiography for the detection of bone microstructure changes in osteoporotic human lumbar spine specimens. Amide proton transfer-weighted CEST MRI for radiotherapy target delineation of glioblastoma: a prospective pilot study. Deep learning-based segmentation of kidneys and renal cysts on T2-weighted MRI from patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Probing clarity: AI-generated simplified breast imaging reports for enhanced patient comprehension powered by ChatGPT-4o. Transfer learning classification of suspicious lesions on breast ultrasound: is there room to avoid biopsies of benign lesions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1