增加银行业的压力:压力测试和冒险情绪

IF 7.2 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Finance Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102596
Raffi E. García , Jyothsna G. Harithsa , Abena Owusu
{"title":"增加银行业的压力:压力测试和冒险情绪","authors":"Raffi E. García ,&nbsp;Jyothsna G. Harithsa ,&nbsp;Abena Owusu","doi":"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the effects of transparency disclosures on U.S. banks’ relayed culture. Using bank stress-test regulations and a regression-discontinuity design, we exploit the quasi-experimental properties around bank-size policy thresholds. We find that stress-tested banks improve their communicated risk-taking culture and overall corporate culture by improving the sentiment around drivers of risk-taking culture, such as leadership. Stress testing, however, has the unintended consequence of negatively affecting sentiment regarding teamwork and innovation. We find that only banks with strong risk-taking-culture sentiments further reduce their risk-weighted assets and risky loans while increasing profitability, highlighting the distinctive role of the risk subculture in banking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adding stress in banking: Stress tests and risk-taking sentiments\",\"authors\":\"Raffi E. García ,&nbsp;Jyothsna G. Harithsa ,&nbsp;Abena Owusu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study the effects of transparency disclosures on U.S. banks’ relayed culture. Using bank stress-test regulations and a regression-discontinuity design, we exploit the quasi-experimental properties around bank-size policy thresholds. We find that stress-tested banks improve their communicated risk-taking culture and overall corporate culture by improving the sentiment around drivers of risk-taking culture, such as leadership. Stress testing, however, has the unintended consequence of negatively affecting sentiment regarding teamwork and innovation. We find that only banks with strong risk-taking-culture sentiments further reduce their risk-weighted assets and risky loans while increasing profitability, highlighting the distinctive role of the risk subculture in banking.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924000580\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924000580","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了透明度披露对美国银行中继文化的影响。利用银行压力测试法规和回归-不连续设计,我们利用了银行规模政策阈值的准实验属性。我们发现,接受压力测试的银行通过改善领导力等风险承担文化驱动因素的情绪,改善了其传达的风险承担文化和整体企业文化。然而,压力测试却意外地对团队合作和创新产生了负面影响。我们发现,只有风险承担文化氛围浓厚的银行才能进一步降低风险加权资产和风险贷款,同时提高盈利能力,这凸显了风险亚文化在银行业中的独特作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adding stress in banking: Stress tests and risk-taking sentiments

We study the effects of transparency disclosures on U.S. banks’ relayed culture. Using bank stress-test regulations and a regression-discontinuity design, we exploit the quasi-experimental properties around bank-size policy thresholds. We find that stress-tested banks improve their communicated risk-taking culture and overall corporate culture by improving the sentiment around drivers of risk-taking culture, such as leadership. Stress testing, however, has the unintended consequence of negatively affecting sentiment regarding teamwork and innovation. We find that only banks with strong risk-taking-culture sentiments further reduce their risk-weighted assets and risky loans while increasing profitability, highlighting the distinctive role of the risk subculture in banking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Corporate Finance
Journal of Corporate Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Corporate Finance aims to publish high quality, original manuscripts that analyze issues related to corporate finance. Contributions can be of a theoretical, empirical, or clinical nature. Topical areas of interest include, but are not limited to: financial structure, payout policies, corporate restructuring, financial contracts, corporate governance arrangements, the economics of organizations, the influence of legal structures, and international financial management. Papers that apply asset pricing and microstructure analysis to corporate finance issues are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Private equity buyouts & firm exporting in crisis periods: Exploring a new channel Reserves regulation and the risk-taking channel Anti-collusion leniency legislations and IPO activity: Worldwide evidence Sibling co-management and cost of capital: Evidence from Chinese listed family firms Long-term institutional investors and climate change news Beta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1