胸廓旋转运动的比较分析:站立式和四足式运动范围的改善

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Acta medica Okayama Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.18926/AMO/67200
Koji Murofushi, Sho Mitomo, Kenji Hirohata, Hidetaka Furuya, Hiroki Katagiri, Koji Kaneoka, Kazuyoshi Yagishita
{"title":"胸廓旋转运动的比较分析:站立式和四足式运动范围的改善","authors":"Koji Murofushi, Sho Mitomo, Kenji Hirohata, Hidetaka Furuya, Hiroki Katagiri, Koji Kaneoka, Kazuyoshi Yagishita","doi":"10.18926/AMO/67200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There have been few investigations into the effectiveness of thoracic spine exercises for improving thoracic range of motion (ROM) in any plane. This study assessed the effectiveness of two thoracic spine exercises: one in the quadruped position and one in the thoracic standing position. We determined how these exercises affect thoracic spine mobility ROM over a 2-week intervention period. Thirty-nine healthy participants were enrolled and assigned to a Quadruped Thoracic Rotation group (n=17 participants: 9 females and 8 males) or Flamenco Thoracic Spine Rotation group (n=22: 14 females and 8 males). All participants were administered a KOJI AWARENESSTM screening test, and the initial thoracic spine ROM before intervention exercise was measured in a laboratory setting. Quadruped Thoracic Rotation was performed as the quadruped exercise and Flamenco Thoracic Spine Rotation as the standing exercise. The KOJI AWARENESSTM thoracic spine test and ROM were evaluated on the day after the first exercise session and again after the program. Despite their different approaches to thoracic mobility, the quadruped exercise and standing exercise achieved equivalent improvement in thoracic ROM after 2 weeks. Practitioners have a range of exercise options for enhancing thoracic mobility based on their environmental or task-specific needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"78 3","pages":"251-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Thoracic Rotation Exercises: Range of Motion Improvement in Standing and Quadruped Variants.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Murofushi, Sho Mitomo, Kenji Hirohata, Hidetaka Furuya, Hiroki Katagiri, Koji Kaneoka, Kazuyoshi Yagishita\",\"doi\":\"10.18926/AMO/67200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There have been few investigations into the effectiveness of thoracic spine exercises for improving thoracic range of motion (ROM) in any plane. This study assessed the effectiveness of two thoracic spine exercises: one in the quadruped position and one in the thoracic standing position. We determined how these exercises affect thoracic spine mobility ROM over a 2-week intervention period. Thirty-nine healthy participants were enrolled and assigned to a Quadruped Thoracic Rotation group (n=17 participants: 9 females and 8 males) or Flamenco Thoracic Spine Rotation group (n=22: 14 females and 8 males). All participants were administered a KOJI AWARENESSTM screening test, and the initial thoracic spine ROM before intervention exercise was measured in a laboratory setting. Quadruped Thoracic Rotation was performed as the quadruped exercise and Flamenco Thoracic Spine Rotation as the standing exercise. The KOJI AWARENESSTM thoracic spine test and ROM were evaluated on the day after the first exercise session and again after the program. Despite their different approaches to thoracic mobility, the quadruped exercise and standing exercise achieved equivalent improvement in thoracic ROM after 2 weeks. Practitioners have a range of exercise options for enhancing thoracic mobility based on their environmental or task-specific needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica Okayama\",\"volume\":\"78 3\",\"pages\":\"251-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica Okayama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/67200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/67200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关胸椎锻炼对改善胸椎在任何平面上的运动范围(ROM)的有效性的研究很少。本研究评估了两种胸椎运动的有效性:一种是四足位运动,另一种是胸椎站立位运动。我们确定了这些运动在两周干预期内对胸椎活动度 ROM 的影响。我们招募了 39 名健康参与者,并将他们分配到四足胸椎旋转组(17 人:9 名女性和 8 名男性)或弗拉明戈胸椎旋转组(22 人:14 名女性和 8 名男性)。所有参与者均接受了 KOJI AWARENESSTM 筛选测试,并在实验室环境中测量了干预锻炼前的初始胸椎 ROM。四足胸椎旋转运动作为四足运动,弗拉门戈胸椎旋转运动作为站立运动。KOJI AWARENESSTM 胸椎测试和 ROM 在首次锻炼后的第二天进行评估,并在项目结束后再次进行评估。尽管锻炼胸廓活动度的方法不同,但在两周后,四足锻炼和站立锻炼对胸廓活动度的改善效果相当。根据环境或特定任务的需要,医生有一系列增强胸廓活动度的锻炼选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Thoracic Rotation Exercises: Range of Motion Improvement in Standing and Quadruped Variants.

There have been few investigations into the effectiveness of thoracic spine exercises for improving thoracic range of motion (ROM) in any plane. This study assessed the effectiveness of two thoracic spine exercises: one in the quadruped position and one in the thoracic standing position. We determined how these exercises affect thoracic spine mobility ROM over a 2-week intervention period. Thirty-nine healthy participants were enrolled and assigned to a Quadruped Thoracic Rotation group (n=17 participants: 9 females and 8 males) or Flamenco Thoracic Spine Rotation group (n=22: 14 females and 8 males). All participants were administered a KOJI AWARENESSTM screening test, and the initial thoracic spine ROM before intervention exercise was measured in a laboratory setting. Quadruped Thoracic Rotation was performed as the quadruped exercise and Flamenco Thoracic Spine Rotation as the standing exercise. The KOJI AWARENESSTM thoracic spine test and ROM were evaluated on the day after the first exercise session and again after the program. Despite their different approaches to thoracic mobility, the quadruped exercise and standing exercise achieved equivalent improvement in thoracic ROM after 2 weeks. Practitioners have a range of exercise options for enhancing thoracic mobility based on their environmental or task-specific needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Radon Inhalation on Murine Brain Proteins: Investigation Using Proteomic and Multivariate Analyses. Factors Affecting Dynamic Postural Control Ability in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Focal Cerebral Hypoperfusion Detected by Arterial Spin-Labeled Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Migraine Presenting with Neurological Symptoms Concomitant with or without Headache. Occult Nesidioblastosis Detected by 111In-Pentetreotide Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Pediatric Severe Febrile Thrombocytopenia Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1