通过在日本冲绳进行的回顾性分析,从放射免疫分析法 (RIA) 到化学发光酶免疫分析法 (CLEIA) 测量血浆醛固酮浓度 (PAC) 对诊断原发性醛固酮增多症 (PA) 的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine journal Pub Date : 2024-09-02 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227
Ken-Ichiro Honma, Yoshiro Nakayama, Atsuko Tamaki, Moriyuki Uehara, Taiki Teruya, Takamitsu Yabiku, Yohei Ishiki, Ken Yonaha, Rei Chinen, Tsugumi Uema, Shiki Okamoto, Hiroaki Masuzaki
{"title":"通过在日本冲绳进行的回顾性分析,从放射免疫分析法 (RIA) 到化学发光酶免疫分析法 (CLEIA) 测量血浆醛固酮浓度 (PAC) 对诊断原发性醛固酮增多症 (PA) 的影响。","authors":"Ken-Ichiro Honma, Yoshiro Nakayama, Atsuko Tamaki, Moriyuki Uehara, Taiki Teruya, Takamitsu Yabiku, Yohei Ishiki, Ken Yonaha, Rei Chinen, Tsugumi Uema, Shiki Okamoto, Hiroaki Masuzaki","doi":"10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11631,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine journal","volume":" ","pages":"895-906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the transition from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for the measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) on the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) via retrospective analyses in Okinawa, Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Ken-Ichiro Honma, Yoshiro Nakayama, Atsuko Tamaki, Moriyuki Uehara, Taiki Teruya, Takamitsu Yabiku, Yohei Ishiki, Ken Yonaha, Rei Chinen, Tsugumi Uema, Shiki Okamoto, Hiroaki Masuzaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"895-906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日本,测量血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)的传统方法是放射免疫分析法(RIA),这种方法存在一些挑战,包括认证参考材料的可追溯性差以及低浓度时检测灵敏度降低。为了克服这些问题,2021 年 4 月,日本内分泌学会发布了原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的新指南,并推出了用于 PAC 测量的化学发光酶免疫测定法(CLEIA)。本研究旨在评估 PAC 测量从 RIA 过渡到 CLEIA 对 PA 诊断的影响。研究分析了琉球大学医院内科二部在 2012 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间收治的 190 名患者的数据。确诊为 PA 的患者接受了肾上腺静脉采样。使用转换公式将 RIA 测得的 PAC(PAC(RIA))转换为 CLEIA 测得的估计 PAC(ePAC(CLEIA))。本研究评估了基于筛查(SC)、卡托普利挑战试验(CCT)、生理盐水输注试验(SIT)和 PA 诊断的诊断不一致率,根据以前的指南用 PAC(RIA)判断的结果与根据新指南用 ePAC(CLEIA)判断的结果不一致。结果显示,SC 和 CCT 的诊断不一致率分别为 6.4% 和 10.1%,而 SIT 的诊断不一致率为零。PA 的诊断不一致率为 3.7%。我们的研究揭示了使用 PAC(CLEIA)建立适当的 PA 诊断标准所面临的挑战,并强调了进一步研究临时阳性类别的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of the transition from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for the measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) on the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) via retrospective analyses in Okinawa, Japan.

In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine journal
Endocrine journal 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Endocrine Journal is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal with a long history. This journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles in multifaceted fields of basic, translational and clinical endocrinology. Endocrine Journal provides a chance to exchange your ideas, concepts and scientific observations in any area of recent endocrinology. Manuscripts may be submitted as Original Articles, Notes, Rapid Communications or Review Articles. We have a rapid reviewing and editorial decision system and pay a special attention to our quick, truly scientific and frequently-citable publication. Please go through the link for author guideline.
期刊最新文献
A parent and child with Liddle syndrome diagnosed correctly with the child as the proband: a case report with review of literature. Effects of breaking up prolonged sitting via exercise snacks intervention on the body composition and plasma metabolomics of sedentary obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Associations between muscle quality and whole-body vibration exercise-induced changes in plasma hypoxanthine following an oral glucose load in healthy male subjects. Dose-response relationship between the fatty liver index and asthma risk: NHANES 2001~2018. Updates on WHO 5th edition classification, molecular characteristics and tumor microenvironment of adrenocortical carcinomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1