{"title":"通过在日本冲绳进行的回顾性分析,从放射免疫分析法 (RIA) 到化学发光酶免疫分析法 (CLEIA) 测量血浆醛固酮浓度 (PAC) 对诊断原发性醛固酮增多症 (PA) 的影响。","authors":"Ken-Ichiro Honma, Yoshiro Nakayama, Atsuko Tamaki, Moriyuki Uehara, Taiki Teruya, Takamitsu Yabiku, Yohei Ishiki, Ken Yonaha, Rei Chinen, Tsugumi Uema, Shiki Okamoto, Hiroaki Masuzaki","doi":"10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11631,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine journal","volume":" ","pages":"895-906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the transition from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for the measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) on the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) via retrospective analyses in Okinawa, Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Ken-Ichiro Honma, Yoshiro Nakayama, Atsuko Tamaki, Moriyuki Uehara, Taiki Teruya, Takamitsu Yabiku, Yohei Ishiki, Ken Yonaha, Rei Chinen, Tsugumi Uema, Shiki Okamoto, Hiroaki Masuzaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"895-906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在日本,测量血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)的传统方法是放射免疫分析法(RIA),这种方法存在一些挑战,包括认证参考材料的可追溯性差以及低浓度时检测灵敏度降低。为了克服这些问题,2021 年 4 月,日本内分泌学会发布了原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的新指南,并推出了用于 PAC 测量的化学发光酶免疫测定法(CLEIA)。本研究旨在评估 PAC 测量从 RIA 过渡到 CLEIA 对 PA 诊断的影响。研究分析了琉球大学医院内科二部在 2012 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间收治的 190 名患者的数据。确诊为 PA 的患者接受了肾上腺静脉采样。使用转换公式将 RIA 测得的 PAC(PAC(RIA))转换为 CLEIA 测得的估计 PAC(ePAC(CLEIA))。本研究评估了基于筛查(SC)、卡托普利挑战试验(CCT)、生理盐水输注试验(SIT)和 PA 诊断的诊断不一致率,根据以前的指南用 PAC(RIA)判断的结果与根据新指南用 ePAC(CLEIA)判断的结果不一致。结果显示,SC 和 CCT 的诊断不一致率分别为 6.4% 和 10.1%,而 SIT 的诊断不一致率为零。PA 的诊断不一致率为 3.7%。我们的研究揭示了使用 PAC(CLEIA)建立适当的 PA 诊断标准所面临的挑战,并强调了进一步研究临时阳性类别的必要性。
Impact of the transition from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for the measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) on the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) via retrospective analyses in Okinawa, Japan.
In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.
期刊介绍:
Endocrine Journal is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal with a long history. This journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles in multifaceted fields of basic, translational and clinical endocrinology. Endocrine Journal provides a chance to exchange your ideas, concepts and scientific observations in any area of recent endocrinology. Manuscripts may be submitted as Original Articles, Notes, Rapid Communications or Review Articles. We have a rapid reviewing and editorial decision system and pay a special attention to our quick, truly scientific and frequently-citable publication. Please go through the link for author guideline.