机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中痛觉水平定向镇痛管理对阿片类药物用量的影响:单中心、单盲、随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03365-x
Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yuma Kadoya, Takanori Suzuka, Takayuki Yamanaka, Mitsuru Ida, Yusuke Naito, Naoki Ozu, Shunta Hori, Masahiko Kawaguchi
{"title":"机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中痛觉水平定向镇痛管理对阿片类药物用量的影响:单中心、单盲、随机对照试验。","authors":"Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yuma Kadoya, Takanori Suzuka, Takayuki Yamanaka, Mitsuru Ida, Yusuke Naito, Naoki Ozu, Shunta Hori, Masahiko Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03365-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the importance of appropriate opioid administration methods according to nociceptive monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 54 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive nociception level (NOL)-directed intraoperative opioid management with a minimum flow of remifentanil (NOL group) or conventional intraoperative analgesic management (control group). The primary outcome was the mean intraoperative remifentanil infusion flow rate (intraoperative remifentanil usage [μg]/ideal body weight [kg]/operation time [min]). The main secondary outcomes were plasma concentrations of three perioperative inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein [CRP], and cortisol levels) and postoperative pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) scores 2 h postoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard analgesia management, NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% ( - 0.038; 95% confidence interval, - 0.059 to - 0.017; p = 0.0007). NOL-directed management did not lead to an increase in IL-6, CRP, or cortisol levels compared with conventional analgesic management. Furthermore, this protocol led to improvements in the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% and the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3 without an increase in inflammatory marker levels.</p><p><strong>Registry number: </strong>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, JRCTs052220034.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"631-641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of nociception level-directed analgesic management on opioid usage in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yuma Kadoya, Takanori Suzuka, Takayuki Yamanaka, Mitsuru Ida, Yusuke Naito, Naoki Ozu, Shunta Hori, Masahiko Kawaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00540-024-03365-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the importance of appropriate opioid administration methods according to nociceptive monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 54 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive nociception level (NOL)-directed intraoperative opioid management with a minimum flow of remifentanil (NOL group) or conventional intraoperative analgesic management (control group). The primary outcome was the mean intraoperative remifentanil infusion flow rate (intraoperative remifentanil usage [μg]/ideal body weight [kg]/operation time [min]). The main secondary outcomes were plasma concentrations of three perioperative inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein [CRP], and cortisol levels) and postoperative pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) scores 2 h postoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard analgesia management, NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% ( - 0.038; 95% confidence interval, - 0.059 to - 0.017; p = 0.0007). NOL-directed management did not lead to an increase in IL-6, CRP, or cortisol levels compared with conventional analgesic management. Furthermore, this protocol led to improvements in the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% and the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3 without an increase in inflammatory marker levels.</p><p><strong>Registry number: </strong>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, JRCTs052220034.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"631-641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03365-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03365-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估根据痛觉监测采取适当阿片类药物给药方法的重要性:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,54 名患者在本院接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术。患者被随机分配到接受以痛觉水平(NOL)为导向的术中阿片类药物管理(NOL 组)或常规术中镇痛管理(对照组),前者使用最小流量的瑞芬太尼(remifentanil)。主要结果是术中瑞芬太尼平均输注流速(术中瑞芬太尼用量[μg]/理想体重[kg]/手术时间[分钟])。主要次要结果是三种围手术期炎症生物标志物(白细胞介素-6、C反应蛋白[CRP]和皮质醇水平)的血浆浓度以及术后 2 小时和术后第 1、2、3 和 7 天的术后疼痛(数字评分量表[NRS])评分:与标准镇痛管理相比,NOL指导的镇痛管理减少了20%的瑞芬太尼用量(- 0.038;95%置信区间,- 0.059至- 0.017;p = 0.0007)。与传统镇痛疗法相比,NOL指导疗法不会导致IL-6、CRP或皮质醇水平升高。此外,该方案还改善了术后 2 小时休息时和术后第 3 天运动时的 NRS 评分:结论:NOL引导的镇痛管理减少了20%的瑞芬太尼用量,术后2小时休息时和术后第3天活动时的NRS评分均有所改善,但炎症标志物水平没有增加:日本临床试验登记处,JRCTs052220034。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of nociception level-directed analgesic management on opioid usage in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: To assess the importance of appropriate opioid administration methods according to nociceptive monitoring.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 54 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive nociception level (NOL)-directed intraoperative opioid management with a minimum flow of remifentanil (NOL group) or conventional intraoperative analgesic management (control group). The primary outcome was the mean intraoperative remifentanil infusion flow rate (intraoperative remifentanil usage [μg]/ideal body weight [kg]/operation time [min]). The main secondary outcomes were plasma concentrations of three perioperative inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein [CRP], and cortisol levels) and postoperative pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) scores 2 h postoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.

Results: Compared with standard analgesia management, NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% ( - 0.038; 95% confidence interval, - 0.059 to - 0.017; p = 0.0007). NOL-directed management did not lead to an increase in IL-6, CRP, or cortisol levels compared with conventional analgesic management. Furthermore, this protocol led to improvements in the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3.

Conclusion: NOL-directed analgesic management reduced remifentanil consumption by 20% and the NRS scores at rest 2 h postoperatively and upon movement up to postoperative day 3 without an increase in inflammatory marker levels.

Registry number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, JRCTs052220034.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia. Advantages of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. McGRATH MAC size 1 vs. 2 blades: infant intubation time. Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study. Vasopressors against post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1