巴西南部玉米-大豆轮作生态强化八年:玉米产量和氮肥替代值

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127261
Rafael Otto , Gabriel Barth , Murilo Nunes Valenciano , Johnny Rodrigues Soares , Eros Artur Bohac Francisco , Luis Ignacio Prochnow
{"title":"巴西南部玉米-大豆轮作生态强化八年:玉米产量和氮肥替代值","authors":"Rafael Otto ,&nbsp;Gabriel Barth ,&nbsp;Murilo Nunes Valenciano ,&nbsp;Johnny Rodrigues Soares ,&nbsp;Eros Artur Bohac Francisco ,&nbsp;Luis Ignacio Prochnow","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ecological intensification (EI) can reduce the usage of N fertilizers in agriculture by increasing crops diversity, stimulating N fixation, and recycling plant nutrients in soil. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the EI system compared with farmer practice (FP) and FP with silage (FPS), according to N rate, in the yield of maize and soybean, N agronomic efficiency (NAE), and N fertilizer replacement value (NFRV). A long-term experiment was established in 2011 in Ponta Grossa, Brazil, and evaluated during eight seasons. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design, with three systems (FP, FPS, and EI) as main plot, and N rate applied to maize as subplot at 0, 70, 140, and 210 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with four replicates. The systems consisted of rotational of maize and soybean in a no-till during summer, with different cover crops and fertilization in winter; in the FP, black oat and wheat were cultivated, white oat and ryegrass in FPS, pea and wheat in EI (without fertilizer). All treatments were duplicated to evaluate the crops in all seasons. The maize yield ranged from 9.3 to 12.6 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the eight seasons, where the EI showed higher production than FP and FPS. In the average, the maize accumulated yield (eight seasons) was 5–7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> higher (0.6–0.9 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) in EI compared to FP and FPS. The soybean yield was not influenced by the systems or residual N application. The seasons influenced the maize yield, in which the seasons 2017/18 and 2018/19 resulted in the highest maize yield for all systems, and the season 2015/16 showed the lowest. The production of pea aboveground biomass had small variation between the seasons. The NFRV (N saved) for maximum yield was 16 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (8 % of N applied) in the FPS, and 79 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (38 % of N applied) in the EI, comparing to N required in FP. The NAE was lower in the EI than the FP and FPS and decreased with increase in N rate; e.g., in the season 2011/12, the NAE was 11 kg kg<sup>−1</sup> in the EI and 30 kg kg<sup>−1</sup> in the FP and FPS. The eco-intensification system resulted in higher maize yield and lower N required compared to FP, which can be strategic to increase crop yield, reduce N application, and moving towards regenerative agricultural systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eight years of eco-intensification of maize-soybean rotation in south Brazil: Maize grain production and nitrogen fertilizer replacement value\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Otto ,&nbsp;Gabriel Barth ,&nbsp;Murilo Nunes Valenciano ,&nbsp;Johnny Rodrigues Soares ,&nbsp;Eros Artur Bohac Francisco ,&nbsp;Luis Ignacio Prochnow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ecological intensification (EI) can reduce the usage of N fertilizers in agriculture by increasing crops diversity, stimulating N fixation, and recycling plant nutrients in soil. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the EI system compared with farmer practice (FP) and FP with silage (FPS), according to N rate, in the yield of maize and soybean, N agronomic efficiency (NAE), and N fertilizer replacement value (NFRV). A long-term experiment was established in 2011 in Ponta Grossa, Brazil, and evaluated during eight seasons. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design, with three systems (FP, FPS, and EI) as main plot, and N rate applied to maize as subplot at 0, 70, 140, and 210 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with four replicates. The systems consisted of rotational of maize and soybean in a no-till during summer, with different cover crops and fertilization in winter; in the FP, black oat and wheat were cultivated, white oat and ryegrass in FPS, pea and wheat in EI (without fertilizer). All treatments were duplicated to evaluate the crops in all seasons. The maize yield ranged from 9.3 to 12.6 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the eight seasons, where the EI showed higher production than FP and FPS. In the average, the maize accumulated yield (eight seasons) was 5–7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> higher (0.6–0.9 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) in EI compared to FP and FPS. The soybean yield was not influenced by the systems or residual N application. The seasons influenced the maize yield, in which the seasons 2017/18 and 2018/19 resulted in the highest maize yield for all systems, and the season 2015/16 showed the lowest. The production of pea aboveground biomass had small variation between the seasons. The NFRV (N saved) for maximum yield was 16 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (8 % of N applied) in the FPS, and 79 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (38 % of N applied) in the EI, comparing to N required in FP. The NAE was lower in the EI than the FP and FPS and decreased with increase in N rate; e.g., in the season 2011/12, the NAE was 11 kg kg<sup>−1</sup> in the EI and 30 kg kg<sup>−1</sup> in the FP and FPS. The eco-intensification system resulted in higher maize yield and lower N required compared to FP, which can be strategic to increase crop yield, reduce N application, and moving towards regenerative agricultural systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001825\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态集约化(EI)可通过增加作物多样性、促进氮固定和土壤中植物养分的循环利用来减少农业中氮肥的使用量。在本研究中,我们旨在评估生态强化系统与农民实践(FP)和青贮FP(FPS)相比在玉米和大豆产量、氮农艺效率(NAE)和氮肥替代值(NFRV)方面的效果。2011 年在巴西蓬塔格罗萨进行了一项长期试验,在八个季节中进行了评估。试验采用分小区设计,以三个系统(FP、FPS 和 EI)为主小区,玉米氮肥施用量为 0、70、140 和 210 千克/公顷,共设四个重复小区。这些系统包括夏季玉米和大豆免耕轮作,冬季种植不同的覆盖作物并施肥;在 FP 中种植黑燕麦和小麦,在 FPS 中种植白燕麦和黑麦草,在 EI 中种植豌豆和小麦(不施肥)。所有处理均重复进行,以评估作物在各个季节的表现。八个季节的玉米产量在 9.3 至 12.6 兆克/公顷之间,其中 EI 的产量高于 FP 和 FPS。平均而言,与 FP 和 FPS 相比,EI 的玉米累计产量(八季)高出 5-7 兆克公顷(每年 0.6-0.9 兆克公顷)。大豆产量不受施肥系统或残留氮的影响。季节对玉米产量有影响,其中 2017/18 和 2018/19 这两个季节的玉米产量在所有系统中最高,而 2015/16 这两个季节的玉米产量最低。豌豆地上生物量的产量在各季之间变化较小。与FP所需的氮相比,FPS最高产量的NFRV(节省的氮)为每年每公顷16千克(施用氮的8%),EI为每年每公顷79千克(施用氮的38%)。EI 的净氮当量低于 FP 和 FPS,并且随着氮肥用量的增加而降低;例如,在 2011/12 年度,EI 的净氮当量为 11 千克/公顷,而 FP 和 FPS 为 30 千克/公顷。与 FP 相比,生态集约化系统的玉米产量更高,所需氮素更少,这对提高作物产量、减少氮素施用量和实现再生农业系统具有战略意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eight years of eco-intensification of maize-soybean rotation in south Brazil: Maize grain production and nitrogen fertilizer replacement value

The ecological intensification (EI) can reduce the usage of N fertilizers in agriculture by increasing crops diversity, stimulating N fixation, and recycling plant nutrients in soil. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the EI system compared with farmer practice (FP) and FP with silage (FPS), according to N rate, in the yield of maize and soybean, N agronomic efficiency (NAE), and N fertilizer replacement value (NFRV). A long-term experiment was established in 2011 in Ponta Grossa, Brazil, and evaluated during eight seasons. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design, with three systems (FP, FPS, and EI) as main plot, and N rate applied to maize as subplot at 0, 70, 140, and 210 kg ha−1, with four replicates. The systems consisted of rotational of maize and soybean in a no-till during summer, with different cover crops and fertilization in winter; in the FP, black oat and wheat were cultivated, white oat and ryegrass in FPS, pea and wheat in EI (without fertilizer). All treatments were duplicated to evaluate the crops in all seasons. The maize yield ranged from 9.3 to 12.6 Mg ha−1 in the eight seasons, where the EI showed higher production than FP and FPS. In the average, the maize accumulated yield (eight seasons) was 5–7 Mg ha−1 higher (0.6–0.9 Mg ha−1 year−1) in EI compared to FP and FPS. The soybean yield was not influenced by the systems or residual N application. The seasons influenced the maize yield, in which the seasons 2017/18 and 2018/19 resulted in the highest maize yield for all systems, and the season 2015/16 showed the lowest. The production of pea aboveground biomass had small variation between the seasons. The NFRV (N saved) for maximum yield was 16 kg ha−1 yr−1 (8 % of N applied) in the FPS, and 79 kg ha−1 yr−1 (38 % of N applied) in the EI, comparing to N required in FP. The NAE was lower in the EI than the FP and FPS and decreased with increase in N rate; e.g., in the season 2011/12, the NAE was 11 kg kg−1 in the EI and 30 kg kg−1 in the FP and FPS. The eco-intensification system resulted in higher maize yield and lower N required compared to FP, which can be strategic to increase crop yield, reduce N application, and moving towards regenerative agricultural systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
Nitrogen reduction enhances crop productivity, decreases soil nitrogen loss and optimize its balance in wheat-maize cropping area of the Loess Plateau, China Optimal agronomic measures combined with biochar increased rice yield through enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in soda saline-alkali fields Coupling a dynamic epidemiological model into a process-based crop model to simulate climate change effects on soybean target spot disease in Brazil A custom pipeline for building computational models of plant tissue Estimating rice leaf area index at multiple growth stages with Sentinel-2 data: An evaluation of different retrieval algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1