Zhongda Zeng , Jinfeng Huo , Yuxi Zhang , Yingjiao Shi , Zeying Wu , Qianxu Yang , Xiaodan Zhang
{"title":"三种UPLC-HRMS定性信息的相关性和差异性及在代谢物标注中的潜在通用性研究。","authors":"Zhongda Zeng , Jinfeng Huo , Yuxi Zhang , Yingjiao Shi , Zeying Wu , Qianxu Yang , Xiaodan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The variation of qualitative information among different types of mainstream hyphenated instruments of ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) makes data sharing and standardization, and further comparison of results consistency in metabolite annotation not easy to attain. In this work, a quantitative study of correlation and difference was first achieved to systematically investigate the variation of retention time (t<sub>R</sub>), precursor ion (MS<sup>1</sup>), and product fragment ions (MS<sup>2</sup>) generated by three typical UPLC-HRMS instruments commonly used in metabolomics area. In terms of the findings of systematic and correlated variation of t<sub>R</sub>, MS<sup>1</sup>, and MS<sup>2</sup> between different instruments, a computational strategy for integrated metabolite annotation was proposed to reduce the influence of differential ions, which made full use of the characteristic (common) and non-common fragments for scoring assessment. The regular variations of MS<sup>2</sup> among three instruments under four collision energy voltages of high, medium, low, and hybrid levels were respectively inspected with three technical replicates at each level. These discoveries could improve general metabolite annotation with a known database and similarity comparison. It should provide the potential for metabolite annotation to generalize qualitative information obtained under different experimental conditions or using instruments from various manufacturers, which is still a big headache in untargeted metabolomics. The mixture of standard compounds and serum samples with the addition of standards were applied to demonstrate the principle and performance of the proposed method. The results showed that it could be an optional strategy for general use in HRMS-based metabolomics to offset the difference in metabolite annotation. It has some potential in untargeted metabolomics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the correlation and difference of qualitative information among three types of UPLC-HRMS and potential generalization in metabolites annotation\",\"authors\":\"Zhongda Zeng , Jinfeng Huo , Yuxi Zhang , Yingjiao Shi , Zeying Wu , Qianxu Yang , Xiaodan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The variation of qualitative information among different types of mainstream hyphenated instruments of ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) makes data sharing and standardization, and further comparison of results consistency in metabolite annotation not easy to attain. In this work, a quantitative study of correlation and difference was first achieved to systematically investigate the variation of retention time (t<sub>R</sub>), precursor ion (MS<sup>1</sup>), and product fragment ions (MS<sup>2</sup>) generated by three typical UPLC-HRMS instruments commonly used in metabolomics area. In terms of the findings of systematic and correlated variation of t<sub>R</sub>, MS<sup>1</sup>, and MS<sup>2</sup> between different instruments, a computational strategy for integrated metabolite annotation was proposed to reduce the influence of differential ions, which made full use of the characteristic (common) and non-common fragments for scoring assessment. The regular variations of MS<sup>2</sup> among three instruments under four collision energy voltages of high, medium, low, and hybrid levels were respectively inspected with three technical replicates at each level. These discoveries could improve general metabolite annotation with a known database and similarity comparison. It should provide the potential for metabolite annotation to generalize qualitative information obtained under different experimental conditions or using instruments from various manufacturers, which is still a big headache in untargeted metabolomics. The mixture of standard compounds and serum samples with the addition of standards were applied to demonstrate the principle and performance of the proposed method. The results showed that it could be an optional strategy for general use in HRMS-based metabolomics to offset the difference in metabolite annotation. It has some potential in untargeted metabolomics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224002289\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224002289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study on the correlation and difference of qualitative information among three types of UPLC-HRMS and potential generalization in metabolites annotation
The variation of qualitative information among different types of mainstream hyphenated instruments of ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) makes data sharing and standardization, and further comparison of results consistency in metabolite annotation not easy to attain. In this work, a quantitative study of correlation and difference was first achieved to systematically investigate the variation of retention time (tR), precursor ion (MS1), and product fragment ions (MS2) generated by three typical UPLC-HRMS instruments commonly used in metabolomics area. In terms of the findings of systematic and correlated variation of tR, MS1, and MS2 between different instruments, a computational strategy for integrated metabolite annotation was proposed to reduce the influence of differential ions, which made full use of the characteristic (common) and non-common fragments for scoring assessment. The regular variations of MS2 among three instruments under four collision energy voltages of high, medium, low, and hybrid levels were respectively inspected with three technical replicates at each level. These discoveries could improve general metabolite annotation with a known database and similarity comparison. It should provide the potential for metabolite annotation to generalize qualitative information obtained under different experimental conditions or using instruments from various manufacturers, which is still a big headache in untargeted metabolomics. The mixture of standard compounds and serum samples with the addition of standards were applied to demonstrate the principle and performance of the proposed method. The results showed that it could be an optional strategy for general use in HRMS-based metabolomics to offset the difference in metabolite annotation. It has some potential in untargeted metabolomics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis.
Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches.
Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.