Mitch N Lases, Jojanneke Bruins, Floortje E Scheepers, Nienke van Sambeek, Fiona Ng, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Mike Slade, Ingrid D C van Balkom, Stynke Castelein
{"title":"个人康复是一个跨诊断的概念吗?利用叙事经验测试 CHIME 框架的契合度。","authors":"Mitch N Lases, Jojanneke Bruins, Floortje E Scheepers, Nienke van Sambeek, Fiona Ng, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Mike Slade, Ingrid D C van Balkom, Stynke Castelein","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personal recovery is operationalized in the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment) of recovery processes. CHIME was initially developed through analysis of experiences of people mainly with psychosis, but it might also be valid for investigating recovery in mood-related, autism and other diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine whether personal recovery is transdiagnostic by studying narrative experiences in several diagnostic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty recovery narratives, retrieved from \"Psychiatry Story Bank\" (PSB) in the Netherlands, were analyzed by three coders using CHIME as a deductive framework. New codes were assigned using an inductive approach and member checks were performed after consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five CHIME dimensions were richly reported in the narratives, independent of diagnosis. Seven new domains were identified, such as \"acknowledgement by diagnosis\" and \"gaining self-insight\". These new domains were evaluated to fit well as subdomains within the original CHIME framework. On average, 54.2% of all narrative content was classified as experienced difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recovery stories from different diagnostic perspectives fit well into the CHIME framework, implying that personal recovery is a transdiagnostic concept. Difficulties should not be ignored in the context of personal recovery based on its substantial presence in the recovery narratives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is personal recovery a transdiagnostic concept? Testing the fit of the CHIME framework using narrative experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Mitch N Lases, Jojanneke Bruins, Floortje E Scheepers, Nienke van Sambeek, Fiona Ng, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Mike Slade, Ingrid D C van Balkom, Stynke Castelein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personal recovery is operationalized in the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment) of recovery processes. CHIME was initially developed through analysis of experiences of people mainly with psychosis, but it might also be valid for investigating recovery in mood-related, autism and other diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine whether personal recovery is transdiagnostic by studying narrative experiences in several diagnostic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty recovery narratives, retrieved from \\\"Psychiatry Story Bank\\\" (PSB) in the Netherlands, were analyzed by three coders using CHIME as a deductive framework. New codes were assigned using an inductive approach and member checks were performed after consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five CHIME dimensions were richly reported in the narratives, independent of diagnosis. Seven new domains were identified, such as \\\"acknowledgement by diagnosis\\\" and \\\"gaining self-insight\\\". These new domains were evaluated to fit well as subdomains within the original CHIME framework. On average, 54.2% of all narrative content was classified as experienced difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recovery stories from different diagnostic perspectives fit well into the CHIME framework, implying that personal recovery is a transdiagnostic concept. Difficulties should not be ignored in the context of personal recovery based on its substantial presence in the recovery narratives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is personal recovery a transdiagnostic concept? Testing the fit of the CHIME framework using narrative experiences.
Background: Personal recovery is operationalized in the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment) of recovery processes. CHIME was initially developed through analysis of experiences of people mainly with psychosis, but it might also be valid for investigating recovery in mood-related, autism and other diagnoses.
Aims: To examine whether personal recovery is transdiagnostic by studying narrative experiences in several diagnostic groups.
Methods: Thirty recovery narratives, retrieved from "Psychiatry Story Bank" (PSB) in the Netherlands, were analyzed by three coders using CHIME as a deductive framework. New codes were assigned using an inductive approach and member checks were performed after consensus was reached.
Results: All five CHIME dimensions were richly reported in the narratives, independent of diagnosis. Seven new domains were identified, such as "acknowledgement by diagnosis" and "gaining self-insight". These new domains were evaluated to fit well as subdomains within the original CHIME framework. On average, 54.2% of all narrative content was classified as experienced difficulties.
Conclusions: Recovery stories from different diagnostic perspectives fit well into the CHIME framework, implying that personal recovery is a transdiagnostic concept. Difficulties should not be ignored in the context of personal recovery based on its substantial presence in the recovery narratives.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.