压力空间:二氧化碳捕获和储存的关键地下商品

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104174
Alexander P. Bump, Susan D. Hovorka
{"title":"压力空间:二氧化碳捕获和储存的关键地下商品","authors":"Alexander P. Bump,&nbsp;Susan D. Hovorka","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Storage resource estimates are part of the foundation for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) policy, project development and pipeline routing. Multiple generations of such estimates have found that hundreds and even thousands of gigatons of storage are available in basins around the world. However, these estimates have largely been based on basin-scale static capacity calculations that assume pore space is accessible to CO<sub>2</sub>, because basins have open boundaries that allow water to be displaced and avoid pressure build-up. However, as we now consider large-scale injection that stresses the system capacity, limitations to the flow of CO<sub>2</sub> and displaced brine must be considered. These limits include pressure interactions among multiple projects, physical lateral discontinuities such as faults and facies changes, overpressure, juxtaposition with impermeable basement, and regulatory requirements that require protection of freshwater. We present here a simple algorithm to estimate the total pressure-limited storage resource. Applying it to the example of the Texas coastal Miocene results in a significantly lower storage resource over our previous static capacity estimates (assuming no water production). Based on this assessment, we find that CCS is still unlikely to be capacity-limited, but effective regulation, land valuation and project development will require recalibration and consideration of all projects in pressure communication. We conclude that depth-dependent and geomechanically-limited pressure space, not pore space, is the key subsurface commodity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 104174"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure space: The key subsurface commodity for CCS\",\"authors\":\"Alexander P. Bump,&nbsp;Susan D. Hovorka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Storage resource estimates are part of the foundation for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) policy, project development and pipeline routing. Multiple generations of such estimates have found that hundreds and even thousands of gigatons of storage are available in basins around the world. However, these estimates have largely been based on basin-scale static capacity calculations that assume pore space is accessible to CO<sub>2</sub>, because basins have open boundaries that allow water to be displaced and avoid pressure build-up. However, as we now consider large-scale injection that stresses the system capacity, limitations to the flow of CO<sub>2</sub> and displaced brine must be considered. These limits include pressure interactions among multiple projects, physical lateral discontinuities such as faults and facies changes, overpressure, juxtaposition with impermeable basement, and regulatory requirements that require protection of freshwater. We present here a simple algorithm to estimate the total pressure-limited storage resource. Applying it to the example of the Texas coastal Miocene results in a significantly lower storage resource over our previous static capacity estimates (assuming no water production). Based on this assessment, we find that CCS is still unlikely to be capacity-limited, but effective regulation, land valuation and project development will require recalibration and consideration of all projects in pressure communication. We conclude that depth-dependent and geomechanically-limited pressure space, not pore space, is the key subsurface commodity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

封存资源估算是碳捕集与封存(CCS)政策、项目开发和管道选线的基础之一。多代此类估算结果表明,世界各地的盆地都有数百甚至数千亿吨的储量。然而,这些估算主要基于盆地尺度的静态容量计算,假定二氧化碳可以进入孔隙空间,因为盆地具有开放的边界,允许水被置换,避免压力积聚。然而,由于我们现在考虑的大规模注入会对系统容量造成压力,因此必须考虑二氧化碳和被置换盐水的流动限制。这些限制包括多个项目之间的压力相互作用、物理横向不连续性(如断层和岩层变化)、超压、与不透水基底并置以及需要保护淡水的法规要求。我们在此介绍一种估算总压力受限储层资源的简单算法。将该算法应用于德克萨斯沿岸中新世的例子中,得出的储层资源量大大低于我们之前的静态容量估算(假设不产水)。基于这一评估,我们发现二氧化碳捕获与封存(CCS)仍然不太可能存在容量限制,但有效的监管、土地估价和项目开发将需要重新校准,并在压力沟通中考虑所有项目。我们的结论是,与深度相关且受地质力学限制的压力空间,而非孔隙空间,才是地下的关键商品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pressure space: The key subsurface commodity for CCS

Storage resource estimates are part of the foundation for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) policy, project development and pipeline routing. Multiple generations of such estimates have found that hundreds and even thousands of gigatons of storage are available in basins around the world. However, these estimates have largely been based on basin-scale static capacity calculations that assume pore space is accessible to CO2, because basins have open boundaries that allow water to be displaced and avoid pressure build-up. However, as we now consider large-scale injection that stresses the system capacity, limitations to the flow of CO2 and displaced brine must be considered. These limits include pressure interactions among multiple projects, physical lateral discontinuities such as faults and facies changes, overpressure, juxtaposition with impermeable basement, and regulatory requirements that require protection of freshwater. We present here a simple algorithm to estimate the total pressure-limited storage resource. Applying it to the example of the Texas coastal Miocene results in a significantly lower storage resource over our previous static capacity estimates (assuming no water production). Based on this assessment, we find that CCS is still unlikely to be capacity-limited, but effective regulation, land valuation and project development will require recalibration and consideration of all projects in pressure communication. We conclude that depth-dependent and geomechanically-limited pressure space, not pore space, is the key subsurface commodity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Putting the genie back in the bottle: Decarbonizing petroleum with direct air capture and enhanced oil recovery A conceptual evaluation of the use of Ca(OH)2 for attaining carbon capture rates of 99% in the calcium looping process Determining the dominant factors controlling mineralization in three-dimensional fracture networks Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes Enhanced cation release via acid pretreatment for gigaton-scale geologic CO2 sequestration in basalt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1