{"title":"政府透明度的政治决定因素:来自开放式政府数据倡议的证据","authors":"Sounman Hong, Suho Ji, Taek Kyu Kim","doi":"10.1111/polp.12607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The increasing availability of extensive governmental data, technological advancements, and a rising standard for government openness are encouraging global governments to implement open data initiatives. While some governments are actively adapting to these trends, others remain behind, despite the pressure. This research explores the political and administrative reasons behind these differences. By analyzing how local governments in South Korea handled requests for open data from citizens between 2007 and 2016, the study highlights the importance of political competition and administrative strength in fostering government transparency and effectively addressing citizen data requests. The study assesses open government data based on its scope, time, and quality, finding that higher levels of electoral competition and better administrative capabilities contribute to increased transparency and responsiveness. However, the study's use of a regression discontinuity design reveals that the political party controlling local governments had minimal influence on these factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Heo, Inhye. 2013. “The Political Economy of Policy Gridlock in South Korea: The Case of the Lee Myung-bak Government's Green Growth Policy.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 41(4): 509–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12029.</p>\n \n <p>Heo, Inhye. 2022. “Energy Democratization Policy without Democratization of Policy Governance in South Korea: A Participatory Democracy Perspective.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 50(4): 834–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12480.</p>\n \n <p>Nam, Aerang, and Christopher M. Weible. 2023. “Examining Experts' Discourse in South Korea's Nuclear Power Policy Making: An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Policy Knowledge.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 51(2): 201–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12522.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 3","pages":"633-654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12607","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political determinants of government transparency: Evidence from open government data initiatives\",\"authors\":\"Sounman Hong, Suho Ji, Taek Kyu Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/polp.12607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>The increasing availability of extensive governmental data, technological advancements, and a rising standard for government openness are encouraging global governments to implement open data initiatives. While some governments are actively adapting to these trends, others remain behind, despite the pressure. This research explores the political and administrative reasons behind these differences. By analyzing how local governments in South Korea handled requests for open data from citizens between 2007 and 2016, the study highlights the importance of political competition and administrative strength in fostering government transparency and effectively addressing citizen data requests. The study assesses open government data based on its scope, time, and quality, finding that higher levels of electoral competition and better administrative capabilities contribute to increased transparency and responsiveness. However, the study's use of a regression discontinuity design reveals that the political party controlling local governments had minimal influence on these factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\\n \\n <p>Heo, Inhye. 2013. “The Political Economy of Policy Gridlock in South Korea: The Case of the Lee Myung-bak Government's Green Growth Policy.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 41(4): 509–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12029.</p>\\n \\n <p>Heo, Inhye. 2022. “Energy Democratization Policy without Democratization of Policy Governance in South Korea: A Participatory Democracy Perspective.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 50(4): 834–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12480.</p>\\n \\n <p>Nam, Aerang, and Christopher M. Weible. 2023. “Examining Experts' Discourse in South Korea's Nuclear Power Policy Making: An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Policy Knowledge.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 51(2): 201–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12522.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Policy\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"633-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12607\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大量政府数据的日益可用性、技术进步以及政府开放标准的不断提高,都在鼓励全球政府实施开放数据计划。一些国家的政府正在积极适应这些趋势,而另一些国家的政府尽管面临压力,却仍然落在后面。本研究探讨了这些差异背后的政治和行政原因。通过分析韩国地方政府在 2007 年至 2016 年间如何处理公民的开放数据请求,本研究强调了政治竞争和行政力量在促进政府透明度和有效处理公民数据请求方面的重要性。研究根据开放政府数据的范围、时间和质量对其进行了评估,发现更高水平的选举竞争和更强的行政能力有助于提高透明度和响应能力。然而,该研究采用的回归不连续设计显示,控制地方政府的政党对这些因素的影响微乎其微。 相关文章2013."韩国政策僵局的政治经济学:李明博政府的绿色增长政策"。Politics & Policy 41(4):509–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12029. Heo, Inhye.2022."能源民主化政策与韩国政策治理的民主化》(Energy Democratization Policy without Democratization of Policy Governance in South Korea:A Participatory Democracy Perspective."Politics & Policy 50(4):834–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12480. Nam, Aerang, and Christopher M. Weible.2023."韩国核电政策制定中的专家话语研究:政策知识的倡导联盟框架方法"。Politics & Policy 51(2):201–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12522.
Political determinants of government transparency: Evidence from open government data initiatives
The increasing availability of extensive governmental data, technological advancements, and a rising standard for government openness are encouraging global governments to implement open data initiatives. While some governments are actively adapting to these trends, others remain behind, despite the pressure. This research explores the political and administrative reasons behind these differences. By analyzing how local governments in South Korea handled requests for open data from citizens between 2007 and 2016, the study highlights the importance of political competition and administrative strength in fostering government transparency and effectively addressing citizen data requests. The study assesses open government data based on its scope, time, and quality, finding that higher levels of electoral competition and better administrative capabilities contribute to increased transparency and responsiveness. However, the study's use of a regression discontinuity design reveals that the political party controlling local governments had minimal influence on these factors.
Related Articles
Heo, Inhye. 2013. “The Political Economy of Policy Gridlock in South Korea: The Case of the Lee Myung-bak Government's Green Growth Policy.” Politics & Policy 41(4): 509–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12029.
Heo, Inhye. 2022. “Energy Democratization Policy without Democratization of Policy Governance in South Korea: A Participatory Democracy Perspective.” Politics & Policy 50(4): 834–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12480.
Nam, Aerang, and Christopher M. Weible. 2023. “Examining Experts' Discourse in South Korea's Nuclear Power Policy Making: An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Policy Knowledge.” Politics & Policy 51(2): 201–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12522.