中风后偏瘫患者水上疗法与陆上运动的比较研究:随机对照试验。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002589
Georgia Iatridou, Alexandra N Stergiou, Dimitrios N Varvarousis, Areti Theodorou, Sofia Doulgeri, Henrietta-Syngliti Pelidou, George Dimakopoulos, Avraam Ploumis
{"title":"中风后偏瘫患者水上疗法与陆上运动的比较研究:随机对照试验。","authors":"Georgia Iatridou, Alexandra N Stergiou, Dimitrios N Varvarousis, Areti Theodorou, Sofia Doulgeri, Henrietta-Syngliti Pelidou, George Dimakopoulos, Avraam Ploumis","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of aquatic therapy in individuals with hemiplegia compared with those of a conventional land-based exercise program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a blinded, randomized controlled study of chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia. The participants were randomized in to aquatic therapy (experimental) or conventional therapy (control) groups. The aquatic therapy group conducted the exercise program in a swimming pool, and the conventional therapy group performed to an exercise on the land environment three times per week for 6 wks. Both interventions focused on posture, balance, and weight-bearing exercises. Outcomes included the Berg Balance Scale, Brunnstrom Scale, Motricity Index, muscle strength tests, Modified Ashworth Scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, Trunk Control Test, and Functional Independence Measure. In addition, postural sway was evaluated by using the variables of center of pressure displacements in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of the present study show that the experimental group (26 patients) exhibited significant improvements in spasticity compared with the control group (25 patients) ( P = 0.01). The conventional therapy group also achieved significant improvements ( P < 0.05) in anteroposterior deviation, mediolateral velocity, and total velocity of center of pressure in a sitting position with eyes closed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Land-based exercises were more beneficial in the spasticity of chronic stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"305-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study Between Aquatic Therapy and Land-Based Exercises in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Georgia Iatridou, Alexandra N Stergiou, Dimitrios N Varvarousis, Areti Theodorou, Sofia Doulgeri, Henrietta-Syngliti Pelidou, George Dimakopoulos, Avraam Ploumis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of aquatic therapy in individuals with hemiplegia compared with those of a conventional land-based exercise program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a blinded, randomized controlled study of chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia. The participants were randomized in to aquatic therapy (experimental) or conventional therapy (control) groups. The aquatic therapy group conducted the exercise program in a swimming pool, and the conventional therapy group performed to an exercise on the land environment three times per week for 6 wks. Both interventions focused on posture, balance, and weight-bearing exercises. Outcomes included the Berg Balance Scale, Brunnstrom Scale, Motricity Index, muscle strength tests, Modified Ashworth Scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, Trunk Control Test, and Functional Independence Measure. In addition, postural sway was evaluated by using the variables of center of pressure displacements in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of the present study show that the experimental group (26 patients) exhibited significant improvements in spasticity compared with the control group (25 patients) ( P = 0.01). The conventional therapy group also achieved significant improvements ( P < 0.05) in anteroposterior deviation, mediolateral velocity, and total velocity of center of pressure in a sitting position with eyes closed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Land-based exercises were more beneficial in the spasticity of chronic stroke patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"305-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估水疗对偏瘫患者的效果,并与传统的陆上运动项目进行比较:这是一项针对慢性中风偏瘫患者的盲法随机对照研究。参与者被随机分为水中疗法组(实验组)和传统疗法组(对照组)。水中疗法组在游泳池中进行锻炼,而传统疗法组则在陆地环境中进行锻炼,每周三次,持续六周。两种干预方法都侧重于姿势、平衡和负重练习。结果包括伯格平衡量表、布伦斯特罗姆量表、运动指数、肌力测试、改良阿什沃斯量表、中风姿势评估量表、躯干控制测试和功能独立性测量。此外,还利用压力中心在内侧和前胸方向的位移变量对姿势摇摆进行了评估:本研究结果显示,与对照组(25 名患者)相比,实验组(26 名患者)在痉挛方面有显著改善(P = 0.01)。传统疗法组在闭眼坐姿下的前后偏差、内外侧速度和压力中心总速度方面也有明显改善(p < 0.05):结论:陆上运动对慢性中风患者的痉挛更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study Between Aquatic Therapy and Land-Based Exercises in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of aquatic therapy in individuals with hemiplegia compared with those of a conventional land-based exercise program.

Design: This was a blinded, randomized controlled study of chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia. The participants were randomized in to aquatic therapy (experimental) or conventional therapy (control) groups. The aquatic therapy group conducted the exercise program in a swimming pool, and the conventional therapy group performed to an exercise on the land environment three times per week for 6 wks. Both interventions focused on posture, balance, and weight-bearing exercises. Outcomes included the Berg Balance Scale, Brunnstrom Scale, Motricity Index, muscle strength tests, Modified Ashworth Scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, Trunk Control Test, and Functional Independence Measure. In addition, postural sway was evaluated by using the variables of center of pressure displacements in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions.

Results: The findings of the present study show that the experimental group (26 patients) exhibited significant improvements in spasticity compared with the control group (25 patients) ( P = 0.01). The conventional therapy group also achieved significant improvements ( P < 0.05) in anteroposterior deviation, mediolateral velocity, and total velocity of center of pressure in a sitting position with eyes closed.

Conclusions: Land-based exercises were more beneficial in the spasticity of chronic stroke patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Supplementary Motor Area on Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis. Comparing Prefabricated and 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses for the Management of Flat Foot Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Axillary Nerve Improves Chronic Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Comparative Study Between Aquatic Therapy and Land-Based Exercises in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1