体外心肺复苏术的实际成本:基于时间驱动活动的成本计算研究》。

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001121
Vinodh B Nanjayya, Alisa M Higgins, Laura Morphett, Sonny Thiara, Annalie Jones, Vincent A Pellegrino, Jayne Sheldrake, Stephen Bernard, David Kaye, Alistair Nichol, D James Cooper
{"title":"体外心肺复苏术的实际成本:基于时间驱动活动的成本计算研究》。","authors":"Vinodh B Nanjayya, Alisa M Higgins, Laura Morphett, Sonny Thiara, Annalie Jones, Vincent A Pellegrino, Jayne Sheldrake, Stephen Bernard, David Kaye, Alistair Nichol, D James Cooper","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the actual cost and drivers of the cost of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) care cycle.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>A time-driven activity-based costing study conducted from a healthcare provider perspective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A quaternary care ICU providing around-the-clock E-CPR service for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The E-CPR care cycle was defined as the time from initiating E-CPR to hospital discharge or death of the patient. Detailed process maps with discrete steps and probabilistic decision nodes accounting for the complex trajectories of E-CPR patients were developed. Data about clinical and nonclinical resources and timing of activities was collected multiple times for each process . Total direct costs were calculated using the time estimates and unit costs per resource for all clinical and nonclinical resources. The total direct costs were combined with indirect costs to obtain the total cost of E-CPR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 10 E-CPR care cycles observed during the study period, a minimum of 3 observations were obtained per process. The E-CPR care cycle's mean (95% CI) cost was $75,014 ($66,209-83,222). Initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ECMO management constituted 18% of costs. The ICU management (35%) and surgical costs (20%) were the primary cost determinants. IHCA had a higher mean (95% CI) cost than OHCA ($87,940 [75,372-100,570] vs. 62,595 [53,994-71,890], p < 0.01), mainly because of the increased survival and ICU length of stay of patients with IHCA. The mean cost for each E-CPR survivor was $129,503 ($112,422-147,224).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant costs are associated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. The cost of E-CPR for IHCA was higher compared with the cost of E-CPR for OHCA. The major determinants of the E-CPR costs were ICU and surgical costs. These data can inform the cost-effectiveness analysis of E-CPR in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual Cost of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vinodh B Nanjayya, Alisa M Higgins, Laura Morphett, Sonny Thiara, Annalie Jones, Vincent A Pellegrino, Jayne Sheldrake, Stephen Bernard, David Kaye, Alistair Nichol, D James Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the actual cost and drivers of the cost of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) care cycle.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>A time-driven activity-based costing study conducted from a healthcare provider perspective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A quaternary care ICU providing around-the-clock E-CPR service for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The E-CPR care cycle was defined as the time from initiating E-CPR to hospital discharge or death of the patient. Detailed process maps with discrete steps and probabilistic decision nodes accounting for the complex trajectories of E-CPR patients were developed. Data about clinical and nonclinical resources and timing of activities was collected multiple times for each process . Total direct costs were calculated using the time estimates and unit costs per resource for all clinical and nonclinical resources. The total direct costs were combined with indirect costs to obtain the total cost of E-CPR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 10 E-CPR care cycles observed during the study period, a minimum of 3 observations were obtained per process. The E-CPR care cycle's mean (95% CI) cost was $75,014 ($66,209-83,222). Initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ECMO management constituted 18% of costs. The ICU management (35%) and surgical costs (20%) were the primary cost determinants. IHCA had a higher mean (95% CI) cost than OHCA ($87,940 [75,372-100,570] vs. 62,595 [53,994-71,890], p < 0.01), mainly because of the increased survival and ICU length of stay of patients with IHCA. The mean cost for each E-CPR survivor was $129,503 ($112,422-147,224).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant costs are associated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. The cost of E-CPR for IHCA was higher compared with the cost of E-CPR for OHCA. The major determinants of the E-CPR costs were ICU and surgical costs. These data can inform the cost-effectiveness analysis of E-CPR in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定体外心肺复苏(E-CPR)护理周期的实际成本和成本驱动因素:确定体外心肺复苏(E-CPR)护理周期的实际成本和成本驱动因素:视角:从医疗服务提供者的角度出发,开展一项以时间驱动的活动为基础的成本核算研究:环境:澳大利亚一家四级护理 ICU,为院外心脏骤停(OHCA)和院内心脏骤停(IHCA)提供全天候 E-CPR 服务:E-CPR 护理周期是指从启动 E-CPR 到患者出院或死亡的时间。我们绘制了详细的流程图,其中包括离散步骤和概率决策节点,以反映 E-CPR 患者的复杂轨迹。对每个流程多次收集临床和非临床资源以及活动时间的数据。使用所有临床和非临床资源的时间估算和单位成本计算直接成本总额。将直接成本总额与间接成本合并,得出 E-CPR 的总成本:在研究期间观察到的 10 个 E-CPR 护理周期中,每个流程至少观察到 3 次。E-CPR 护理周期的平均成本(95% CI)为 75,014 美元(66,209-83,222 美元)。启动体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和 ECMO 管理占成本的 18%。重症监护室管理(35%)和手术费用(20%)是决定成本的主要因素。IHCA 的平均费用(95% CI)高于 OHCA(87,940 美元 [75,372-100,570] 对 62,595 美元 [53,994-71,890],P <0.01),主要是因为 IHCA 患者的存活率和重症监护室住院时间增加。每位 E-CPR 幸存者的平均费用为 129,503 美元(112,422-147,224 美元):结论:E-CPR 治疗难治性心脏骤停需要大量费用。结论:难治性心脏骤停的 E-CPR 需要大量费用,IHCA 的 E-CPR 费用高于 OHCA 的 E-CPR 费用。E-CPR 费用的主要决定因素是重症监护室和手术费用。这些数据可为今后的 E-CPR 成本效益分析提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Actual Cost of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Study.

Objectives: To determine the actual cost and drivers of the cost of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) care cycle.

Perspective: A time-driven activity-based costing study conducted from a healthcare provider perspective.

Setting: A quaternary care ICU providing around-the-clock E-CPR service for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in Australia.

Methods: The E-CPR care cycle was defined as the time from initiating E-CPR to hospital discharge or death of the patient. Detailed process maps with discrete steps and probabilistic decision nodes accounting for the complex trajectories of E-CPR patients were developed. Data about clinical and nonclinical resources and timing of activities was collected multiple times for each process . Total direct costs were calculated using the time estimates and unit costs per resource for all clinical and nonclinical resources. The total direct costs were combined with indirect costs to obtain the total cost of E-CPR.

Results: From 10 E-CPR care cycles observed during the study period, a minimum of 3 observations were obtained per process. The E-CPR care cycle's mean (95% CI) cost was $75,014 ($66,209-83,222). Initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ECMO management constituted 18% of costs. The ICU management (35%) and surgical costs (20%) were the primary cost determinants. IHCA had a higher mean (95% CI) cost than OHCA ($87,940 [75,372-100,570] vs. 62,595 [53,994-71,890], p < 0.01), mainly because of the increased survival and ICU length of stay of patients with IHCA. The mean cost for each E-CPR survivor was $129,503 ($112,422-147,224).

Conclusions: Significant costs are associated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. The cost of E-CPR for IHCA was higher compared with the cost of E-CPR for OHCA. The major determinants of the E-CPR costs were ICU and surgical costs. These data can inform the cost-effectiveness analysis of E-CPR in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Statistical Power and Performance of Strategies to Analyze Composites of Survival and Duration of Ventilation in Clinical Trials. Erratum: Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum. Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum. Characterizing the Use of Time-Limited Trials in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study. Utility of Skin Tone on Pulse Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1