家长对儿童口腔健康的担忧:ChatGPT 是否有助于找到适当的答案?

Neeraj Gugnani, Inder Kumar Pandit, Monika Gupta, Shalini Gugnani, Simran Kathuria
{"title":"家长对儿童口腔健康的担忧:ChatGPT 是否有助于找到适当的答案?","authors":"Neeraj Gugnani, Inder Kumar Pandit, Monika Gupta, Shalini Gugnani, Simran Kathuria","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_110_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an important part of our lives owing to increased data availability and improved power of computing. One of the recently launched modalities of AI, ChatGPT, is being enormously used worldwide for different types of tasks. In medical context, its use is being explored for clinical queries, academia, research help, etc. Further, literature suggests that parents seek information about health of their children using different Internet resources and would surely turn toward ChatGPT for the same, as this chatbot model is easy to use, generates \"one\" response, and is available without any subscription. ChatGPT generates a response using text cues and applying different algorithms on prepublished literature but is still in its naïve state; hence, it is imperative to validate the generated responses. Accordingly, we planned this study to determine the clarity, correctness, and completeness of some Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about child's oral health, from a mother's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design was a vignette-based survey and included a set of 23 questions, for which ChatGPT was interviewed from the perspective of an imaginary parent. The answers responded by ChatGPT were copied \"verbatim,\" and a Google survey form was designed. The survey form was validated and then sent to 15 pediatric dentists, and the responses were mainly collected on the Likert's scale with a provision of one open-ended question aiming to determine \"what they would have added\" to this generated response as an expert in the field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses on Likert's scale were condensed and values ≥4 were considered 'adequate and acceptable' while scores ≤3, were considered 'inadequate'. The generated responses and comments mentioned by different respondents in the open-ended question were critiqued in reference to the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the responses were found to be complete and logical and in clear language, with only some inadequacies being reported in few of the answers.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"42 2","pages":"104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental concerns about oral health of children: Is ChatGPT helpful in finding appropriate answers?\",\"authors\":\"Neeraj Gugnani, Inder Kumar Pandit, Monika Gupta, Shalini Gugnani, Simran Kathuria\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_110_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an important part of our lives owing to increased data availability and improved power of computing. One of the recently launched modalities of AI, ChatGPT, is being enormously used worldwide for different types of tasks. In medical context, its use is being explored for clinical queries, academia, research help, etc. Further, literature suggests that parents seek information about health of their children using different Internet resources and would surely turn toward ChatGPT for the same, as this chatbot model is easy to use, generates \\\"one\\\" response, and is available without any subscription. ChatGPT generates a response using text cues and applying different algorithms on prepublished literature but is still in its naïve state; hence, it is imperative to validate the generated responses. Accordingly, we planned this study to determine the clarity, correctness, and completeness of some Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about child's oral health, from a mother's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design was a vignette-based survey and included a set of 23 questions, for which ChatGPT was interviewed from the perspective of an imaginary parent. The answers responded by ChatGPT were copied \\\"verbatim,\\\" and a Google survey form was designed. The survey form was validated and then sent to 15 pediatric dentists, and the responses were mainly collected on the Likert's scale with a provision of one open-ended question aiming to determine \\\"what they would have added\\\" to this generated response as an expert in the field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses on Likert's scale were condensed and values ≥4 were considered 'adequate and acceptable' while scores ≤3, were considered 'inadequate'. The generated responses and comments mentioned by different respondents in the open-ended question were critiqued in reference to the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the responses were found to be complete and logical and in clear language, with only some inadequacies being reported in few of the answers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"104-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_110_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_110_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介由于数据可用性的增加和计算能力的提高,人工智能(AI)正成为我们生活的重要组成部分。最近推出的人工智能模式之一 ChatGPT 正在全球范围内广泛应用于不同类型的任务。在医疗方面,人们正在探索将其用于临床查询、学术、研究帮助等。此外,有文献表明,父母会使用不同的互联网资源寻求有关子女健康的信息,他们也一定会向 ChatGPT 求助,因为这种聊天机器人模式易于使用,能生成 "一个 "回复,而且无需任何订阅。ChatGPT 通过文本线索并应用不同算法对预先发表的文献生成回复,但目前仍处于稚嫩状态;因此,必须对生成的回复进行验证。因此,我们计划进行这项研究,从母亲的角度确定一些有关儿童口腔健康的常见问题(FAQ)的清晰度、正确性和完整性:研究设计了一个基于小故事的调查,包括一组 23 个问题,ChatGPT 从假想父母的角度对这些问题进行了访谈。ChatGPT 的回答被 "逐字复制",并设计了一份谷歌调查表。调查表经过验证后发送给 15 位儿童牙医,主要以李克特量表收集回答,并提供了一个开放式问题,旨在确定作为该领域的专家,他们对所生成的回答 "有何补充":对李克特量表的答复进行了压缩,≥4 分被视为 "充分和可接受",而≤3 分被视为 "不充分"。参照现有文献,对不同受访者在开放式问题中的回答和评论进行了点评:总体而言,受访者的回答内容完整、逻辑严密、语言清晰,只有少数回答存在不足之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental concerns about oral health of children: Is ChatGPT helpful in finding appropriate answers?

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an important part of our lives owing to increased data availability and improved power of computing. One of the recently launched modalities of AI, ChatGPT, is being enormously used worldwide for different types of tasks. In medical context, its use is being explored for clinical queries, academia, research help, etc. Further, literature suggests that parents seek information about health of their children using different Internet resources and would surely turn toward ChatGPT for the same, as this chatbot model is easy to use, generates "one" response, and is available without any subscription. ChatGPT generates a response using text cues and applying different algorithms on prepublished literature but is still in its naïve state; hence, it is imperative to validate the generated responses. Accordingly, we planned this study to determine the clarity, correctness, and completeness of some Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about child's oral health, from a mother's perspective.

Methods: The study design was a vignette-based survey and included a set of 23 questions, for which ChatGPT was interviewed from the perspective of an imaginary parent. The answers responded by ChatGPT were copied "verbatim," and a Google survey form was designed. The survey form was validated and then sent to 15 pediatric dentists, and the responses were mainly collected on the Likert's scale with a provision of one open-ended question aiming to determine "what they would have added" to this generated response as an expert in the field.

Results: The responses on Likert's scale were condensed and values ≥4 were considered 'adequate and acceptable' while scores ≤3, were considered 'inadequate'. The generated responses and comments mentioned by different respondents in the open-ended question were critiqued in reference to the existing literature.

Conclusion: Overall, the responses were found to be complete and logical and in clear language, with only some inadequacies being reported in few of the answers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges faced by dentists during provision of oral health care in children and adolescents with special health-care needs: A scoping review. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth: An in vivo study. Comparison of intranasal ketamine with intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine combination in pediatric dental patients for procedural sedation: A crossover study. Effect of oil pulling on the Streptococcus mutans concentation in plaque around orthodontic brackets -A prospective clinical study. Effect of silver diamine fluoride application on the microtensile bond strength of three commonly used restorative materials in primary teeth: An ultrastructural study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1