美国量化宽松对商品出口国商品和金融资产之间的投资组合平衡效应

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Journal of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2024.102225
Pick Schen Yip , Wee-Yeap Lau , Robert Brooks
{"title":"美国量化宽松对商品出口国商品和金融资产之间的投资组合平衡效应","authors":"Pick Schen Yip ,&nbsp;Wee-Yeap Lau ,&nbsp;Robert Brooks","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyses the portfolio balance channel of the U.S. quantitative easing (QE) by assessing the dynamic spillover effect between commodities and financial assets in commodity-exporting countries during QE. This study integrates the generalized spillover index initially proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) for the fractional integration VAR model. Then, we estimate the multivariate framework of the Westerlund and Narayan (2015) (WN)-based predictive model to quantify the effect of the portfolio balance channel on the net pairwise spillover index from the U.S. to other countries. Our results show: first, for bond yields, that Asian and Pacific bond yields are impacted by both commodity price indices returns and the U.S. bond yields across the sample periods. However, mixed evidence is found for both Latin America and Others; second, for equity, dynamic net return spillovers contribute mixed evidence across regional groups during QE. The diverse results are partly explained by the average percentage of commodity exports to total exports of the country and the degree of close interrelationship between countries. Additionally, dynamic return spillover analyses show that most foreign exchange returns are negative net spillovers during QE, supporting the behavior of “commodity currencies.” Last, the WN-based predictability models show pronounced differences in predictability across the selected commodity-exporting countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824001505/pdfft?md5=80867b2abd413ec8accb18435c56468a&pid=1-s2.0-S1062940824001505-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portfolio balance effect of the U.S. QE between commodities and financial assets in commodity-exporting countries\",\"authors\":\"Pick Schen Yip ,&nbsp;Wee-Yeap Lau ,&nbsp;Robert Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyses the portfolio balance channel of the U.S. quantitative easing (QE) by assessing the dynamic spillover effect between commodities and financial assets in commodity-exporting countries during QE. This study integrates the generalized spillover index initially proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) for the fractional integration VAR model. Then, we estimate the multivariate framework of the Westerlund and Narayan (2015) (WN)-based predictive model to quantify the effect of the portfolio balance channel on the net pairwise spillover index from the U.S. to other countries. Our results show: first, for bond yields, that Asian and Pacific bond yields are impacted by both commodity price indices returns and the U.S. bond yields across the sample periods. However, mixed evidence is found for both Latin America and Others; second, for equity, dynamic net return spillovers contribute mixed evidence across regional groups during QE. The diverse results are partly explained by the average percentage of commodity exports to total exports of the country and the degree of close interrelationship between countries. Additionally, dynamic return spillover analyses show that most foreign exchange returns are negative net spillovers during QE, supporting the behavior of “commodity currencies.” Last, the WN-based predictability models show pronounced differences in predictability across the selected commodity-exporting countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824001505/pdfft?md5=80867b2abd413ec8accb18435c56468a&pid=1-s2.0-S1062940824001505-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824001505\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824001505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过评估量化宽松期间大宗商品出口国大宗商品与金融资产之间的动态溢出效应,分析美国量化宽松(QE)的投资组合平衡渠道。本研究整合了 Diebold 和 Yilmaz(2012 年)最初为分数积分 VAR 模型提出的广义溢出指数。然后,我们估计了基于 Westerlund 和 Narayan(2015 年)(WN)预测模型的多变量框架,以量化投资组合平衡渠道对从美国到其他国家的净成对溢出指数的影响。我们的研究结果表明:首先,就债券收益率而言,亚洲和太平洋地区的债券收益率在整个样本期间都受到商品价格指数收益率和美国债券收益率的影响。然而,拉丁美洲和其他地区的证据不一;第二,就股票而言,在量化宽松期间,动态净回报溢出效应对各地区组的影响不一。造成这种结果差异的部分原因是商品出口在国家总出口中所占的平均比例以及国家之间的密切联系程度。此外,动态回报溢出分析表明,大多数外汇回报在量化宽松期间是负净溢出,支持了 "商品货币 "的行为。最后,基于 WN 的可预测性模型显示,所选商品出口国之间的可预测性存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Portfolio balance effect of the U.S. QE between commodities and financial assets in commodity-exporting countries

This study analyses the portfolio balance channel of the U.S. quantitative easing (QE) by assessing the dynamic spillover effect between commodities and financial assets in commodity-exporting countries during QE. This study integrates the generalized spillover index initially proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) for the fractional integration VAR model. Then, we estimate the multivariate framework of the Westerlund and Narayan (2015) (WN)-based predictive model to quantify the effect of the portfolio balance channel on the net pairwise spillover index from the U.S. to other countries. Our results show: first, for bond yields, that Asian and Pacific bond yields are impacted by both commodity price indices returns and the U.S. bond yields across the sample periods. However, mixed evidence is found for both Latin America and Others; second, for equity, dynamic net return spillovers contribute mixed evidence across regional groups during QE. The diverse results are partly explained by the average percentage of commodity exports to total exports of the country and the degree of close interrelationship between countries. Additionally, dynamic return spillover analyses show that most foreign exchange returns are negative net spillovers during QE, supporting the behavior of “commodity currencies.” Last, the WN-based predictability models show pronounced differences in predictability across the selected commodity-exporting countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
期刊最新文献
ESG rating and default risk: Evidence from China Decoding the stock market dynamics in the banking sector: Short versus long-term insights Static and dynamic return and volatility connectedness between transportation tokens and transportation indices: Evidence from quantile connectedness approach The role of digital transformation in mergers and acquisitions Spillover of fear among the US and BRICS equity markets during the COVID-19 crisis and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1