{"title":"谁会放弃网络旅行调查?调查在线旅行调查期间受访者退出旅行日记的影响","authors":"Kaili Wang, Yicong Liu, Sanjana Hossain, Khandker Nurul Habib","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10510-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Household travel surveys collect core datasets for modelling passenger travel demand. However, the decline in survey completion rate has become a concern in recent years. Among all components, the travel diaries are the most challenging part of CAWI travel surveys and suffer significant dropouts of participation. Therefore, an investigation is necessary to understand the influential factors contributing to participation dropouts while reporting their travel dairies and subsequent non-response bias on data quality. This study utilizes binary logit models to capture the relationship between respondents’ drop-off behaviours while filling out travel diaries, their socioeconomic characteristics and different travel diary designs. The study also develops a generalizable analysis framework to measure the impact of non-response bias on data quality. The analysis framework incorporates a trip generation model with microsimulation and bootstrapping techniques. The results show that a diary design with stable repetitions is preferred by respondents and results in less non-response bias in the final dataset. This study also proposes recommendations for future travel surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who drops off web-based travel surveys? Investigating the impact of respondents dropping out of travel diaries during online travel surveys\",\"authors\":\"Kaili Wang, Yicong Liu, Sanjana Hossain, Khandker Nurul Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10510-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Household travel surveys collect core datasets for modelling passenger travel demand. However, the decline in survey completion rate has become a concern in recent years. Among all components, the travel diaries are the most challenging part of CAWI travel surveys and suffer significant dropouts of participation. Therefore, an investigation is necessary to understand the influential factors contributing to participation dropouts while reporting their travel dairies and subsequent non-response bias on data quality. This study utilizes binary logit models to capture the relationship between respondents’ drop-off behaviours while filling out travel diaries, their socioeconomic characteristics and different travel diary designs. The study also develops a generalizable analysis framework to measure the impact of non-response bias on data quality. The analysis framework incorporates a trip generation model with microsimulation and bootstrapping techniques. The results show that a diary design with stable repetitions is preferred by respondents and results in less non-response bias in the final dataset. This study also proposes recommendations for future travel surveys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10510-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10510-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Who drops off web-based travel surveys? Investigating the impact of respondents dropping out of travel diaries during online travel surveys
Household travel surveys collect core datasets for modelling passenger travel demand. However, the decline in survey completion rate has become a concern in recent years. Among all components, the travel diaries are the most challenging part of CAWI travel surveys and suffer significant dropouts of participation. Therefore, an investigation is necessary to understand the influential factors contributing to participation dropouts while reporting their travel dairies and subsequent non-response bias on data quality. This study utilizes binary logit models to capture the relationship between respondents’ drop-off behaviours while filling out travel diaries, their socioeconomic characteristics and different travel diary designs. The study also develops a generalizable analysis framework to measure the impact of non-response bias on data quality. The analysis framework incorporates a trip generation model with microsimulation and bootstrapping techniques. The results show that a diary design with stable repetitions is preferred by respondents and results in less non-response bias in the final dataset. This study also proposes recommendations for future travel surveys.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.