机器学习在肝癌肝切除术后肝衰竭预测中的实用性

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.2147/jhc.s451025
Hirotaka Tashiro, Takashi Onoe, Naoki Tanimine, Sho Tazuma, Yoshiyuki Shibata, Takeshi Sudo, Haruki Sada, Norimitsu Shimada, Hirofumi Tazawa, Takahisa Suzuki, Yosuke Shimizu
{"title":"机器学习在肝癌肝切除术后肝衰竭预测中的实用性","authors":"Hirotaka Tashiro, Takashi Onoe, Naoki Tanimine, Sho Tazuma, Yoshiyuki Shibata, Takeshi Sudo, Haruki Sada, Norimitsu Shimada, Hirofumi Tazawa, Takahisa Suzuki, Yosuke Shimizu","doi":"10.2147/jhc.s451025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication associated with high mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has rapidly developed and may outperform traditional models in predicting PHLF in patients who have undergone hepatectomy. This study aimed to predict PHLF using ML and compare its performance with that of traditional scoring systems.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> The clinicopathological data of 334 patients who underwent liver resection were retrospectively collected. The Pycaret library, a simple, open-source machine learning library, was used to compare multiple classification models for PHLF prediction. The predictive performance of 15 ML algorithms was compared using the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and accuracy, and the best-fit model was selected among 15 ML algorithms. Next, the predictive performance of the selected ML-PHLF model was compared with that of routine scoring systems, the albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, using AUROC.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The best model was extreme gradient boosting (accuracy:93.1%; AUROC:0.863) among the 15 ML algorithms. As compared with ALBI and FIB-4, the ML PHLF model had higher AUROC for predicting PHLF.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The novel ML model for predicting PHLF outperformed routine scoring systems.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Machine Learning in the Prediction of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Liver Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Hirotaka Tashiro, Takashi Onoe, Naoki Tanimine, Sho Tazuma, Yoshiyuki Shibata, Takeshi Sudo, Haruki Sada, Norimitsu Shimada, Hirofumi Tazawa, Takahisa Suzuki, Yosuke Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/jhc.s451025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication associated with high mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has rapidly developed and may outperform traditional models in predicting PHLF in patients who have undergone hepatectomy. This study aimed to predict PHLF using ML and compare its performance with that of traditional scoring systems.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> The clinicopathological data of 334 patients who underwent liver resection were retrospectively collected. The Pycaret library, a simple, open-source machine learning library, was used to compare multiple classification models for PHLF prediction. The predictive performance of 15 ML algorithms was compared using the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and accuracy, and the best-fit model was selected among 15 ML algorithms. Next, the predictive performance of the selected ML-PHLF model was compared with that of routine scoring systems, the albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, using AUROC.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The best model was extreme gradient boosting (accuracy:93.1%; AUROC:0.863) among the 15 ML algorithms. As compared with ALBI and FIB-4, the ML PHLF model had higher AUROC for predicting PHLF.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The novel ML model for predicting PHLF outperformed routine scoring systems.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/jhc.s451025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/jhc.s451025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF肝切除术后肝衰竭(PHLF)是一种与高死亡率相关的严重并发症。机器学习(ML)发展迅速,在预测肝切除术后患者 PHLF 方面可能优于传统模型。本研究旨在利用 ML 预测 PHLF,并比较其与传统评分系统的性能:方法:回顾性收集了334名接受肝切除术患者的临床病理数据。使用 Pycaret 库(一个简单的开源机器学习库)比较了用于 PHLF 预测的多种分类模型。使用接收者操作特征曲线下的平均面积(AUROC)和准确率比较了15种ML算法的预测性能,并从15种ML算法中选出了最佳拟合模型。然后,利用 AUROC 将所选 ML-PHLF 模型的预测性能与常规评分系统、白蛋白-胆红素评分(ALBI)和纤维化-4(FIB-4)指数进行比较:结果:在 15 种 ML 算法中,最佳模型是极梯度增强算法(准确率:93.1%;AUROC:0.863)。与 ALBI 和 FIB-4 相比,ML PHLF 模型预测 PHLF 的 AUROC 更高:结论:预测 PHLF 的新型 ML 模型优于常规评分系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of Machine Learning in the Prediction of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Liver Cancer
Background: Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication associated with high mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has rapidly developed and may outperform traditional models in predicting PHLF in patients who have undergone hepatectomy. This study aimed to predict PHLF using ML and compare its performance with that of traditional scoring systems.
Methods: The clinicopathological data of 334 patients who underwent liver resection were retrospectively collected. The Pycaret library, a simple, open-source machine learning library, was used to compare multiple classification models for PHLF prediction. The predictive performance of 15 ML algorithms was compared using the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and accuracy, and the best-fit model was selected among 15 ML algorithms. Next, the predictive performance of the selected ML-PHLF model was compared with that of routine scoring systems, the albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, using AUROC.
Results: The best model was extreme gradient boosting (accuracy:93.1%; AUROC:0.863) among the 15 ML algorithms. As compared with ALBI and FIB-4, the ML PHLF model had higher AUROC for predicting PHLF.
Conclusion: The novel ML model for predicting PHLF outperformed routine scoring systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor Showed Improved Survival for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin Use After Thermal Ablation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study Differences in Prediagnostic Serum Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiles Between Cirrhosis Patients with and without Incident Hepatocellular Carcinoma TACE Combined with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus 125I Seed Implantation in the Treatment of HCC with Hepatic Arterioportal Shunts. A Machine Learning Model Based on Counterfactual Theory for Treatment Decision of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1