{"title":"接触引起的犹太新阿拉姆方言变化","authors":"Geoffrey Khan","doi":"10.1163/22134638-bja10036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, I present an introductory overview of the Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects, followed by a study of various aspects of contact-induced change that are exhibited by these dialects. Neo-Aramaic dialects were also spoken by Christian communities in the same region. The Jewish and Christian dialects differ from one another, even where the two communities lived in the same geographical area. I show that contact-induced change was generally more advanced in Jewish <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">NENA</span> dialects than in neighboring Christian dialects. I also demonstrate that a study of contact-induced changes provides evidence of the migration history of the communities. I present two case studies of differing degrees of convergence with contact languages and evidence of different migration patterns. These are (i) the Jewish and Christian <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">NENA</span> dialects of Urmi (northwestern Iran) and (ii) the Jewish and Christian <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">NENA</span> dialects of Sanandaj (western Iran).</p>","PeriodicalId":40699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jewish Languages","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact-Induced Change in the Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialects\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22134638-bja10036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this article, I present an introductory overview of the Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects, followed by a study of various aspects of contact-induced change that are exhibited by these dialects. Neo-Aramaic dialects were also spoken by Christian communities in the same region. The Jewish and Christian dialects differ from one another, even where the two communities lived in the same geographical area. I show that contact-induced change was generally more advanced in Jewish <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">NENA</span> dialects than in neighboring Christian dialects. I also demonstrate that a study of contact-induced changes provides evidence of the migration history of the communities. I present two case studies of differing degrees of convergence with contact languages and evidence of different migration patterns. These are (i) the Jewish and Christian <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">NENA</span> dialects of Urmi (northwestern Iran) and (ii) the Jewish and Christian <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">NENA</span> dialects of Sanandaj (western Iran).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Jewish Languages\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Jewish Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134638-bja10036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jewish Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134638-bja10036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contact-Induced Change in the Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialects
In this article, I present an introductory overview of the Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects, followed by a study of various aspects of contact-induced change that are exhibited by these dialects. Neo-Aramaic dialects were also spoken by Christian communities in the same region. The Jewish and Christian dialects differ from one another, even where the two communities lived in the same geographical area. I show that contact-induced change was generally more advanced in Jewish NENA dialects than in neighboring Christian dialects. I also demonstrate that a study of contact-induced changes provides evidence of the migration history of the communities. I present two case studies of differing degrees of convergence with contact languages and evidence of different migration patterns. These are (i) the Jewish and Christian NENA dialects of Urmi (northwestern Iran) and (ii) the Jewish and Christian NENA dialects of Sanandaj (western Iran).