对入侵的非本地淡水双壳类动物进行系统回顾。

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1111/brv.13113
Juliani Giselli Prestes, Laís Carneiro, Natali Oliva Roman Miiller, Ananda Karla Alves Neundorf, Clemerson Richard Pedroso, Raul Rennó Braga, Ronaldo Sousa, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule
{"title":"对入侵的非本地淡水双壳类动物进行系统回顾。","authors":"Juliani Giselli Prestes,&nbsp;Laís Carneiro,&nbsp;Natali Oliva Roman Miiller,&nbsp;Ananda Karla Alves Neundorf,&nbsp;Clemerson Richard Pedroso,&nbsp;Raul Rennó Braga,&nbsp;Ronaldo Sousa,&nbsp;Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule","doi":"10.1111/brv.13113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The introduction of invasive species has become an increasing environmental problem in freshwater ecosystems due to the high economic and ecological impacts it has generated. This systematic review covers publications from 2010 to 2020, focusing on non-native invasive freshwater bivalves, a particularly relevant and widespread introduced taxonomic group in fresh waters. We collected information on the most studied species, the main objectives of the studies, their geographical location, study duration, and type of research. Furthermore, we focused on assessing the levels of ecological evidence presented, the type of interactions of non-native bivalves with other organisms and the classification of their impacts. A total of 397 publications were retrieved. The studies addressed a total of 17 species of non-native freshwater bivalves; however, most publications focused on the species <i>Corbicula fluminea</i> and <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>, which are recognised for their widespread distribution and extensive negative impacts. Many other non-native invasive bivalve species have been poorly studied. A high geographical bias was also present, with a considerable lack of studies in developing countries. The most frequent studies had shorter temporal periods, smaller spatial extents, and more observational data, were field-based, and usually evaluated possible ecological impacts at the individual and population levels. There were 94 publications documenting discernible impacts according to the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). However, 41 of these publications did not provide sufficient data to determine an impact. The most common effects of invasive bivalves on ecosystems were structural alterations, and chemical and physical changes, which are anticipated due to their role as ecosystem engineers. Despite a considerable number of studies in the field and advances in our understanding of some species over the past decade, long-term data and large-scale studies are still needed to understand better the impacts, particularly at the community and ecosystem levels and in less-studied geographic regions. The widespread distribution of several non-native freshwater bivalves, their ongoing introductions, and high ecological and economic impacts demand continued research. Systematic reviews such as this are essential for identifying knowledge gaps and guiding future research to enable a more complete understanding of the ecological implications of invasive bivalves, and the development of effective management strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 6","pages":"2082-2107"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of invasive non-native freshwater bivalves\",\"authors\":\"Juliani Giselli Prestes,&nbsp;Laís Carneiro,&nbsp;Natali Oliva Roman Miiller,&nbsp;Ananda Karla Alves Neundorf,&nbsp;Clemerson Richard Pedroso,&nbsp;Raul Rennó Braga,&nbsp;Ronaldo Sousa,&nbsp;Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.13113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The introduction of invasive species has become an increasing environmental problem in freshwater ecosystems due to the high economic and ecological impacts it has generated. This systematic review covers publications from 2010 to 2020, focusing on non-native invasive freshwater bivalves, a particularly relevant and widespread introduced taxonomic group in fresh waters. We collected information on the most studied species, the main objectives of the studies, their geographical location, study duration, and type of research. Furthermore, we focused on assessing the levels of ecological evidence presented, the type of interactions of non-native bivalves with other organisms and the classification of their impacts. A total of 397 publications were retrieved. The studies addressed a total of 17 species of non-native freshwater bivalves; however, most publications focused on the species <i>Corbicula fluminea</i> and <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>, which are recognised for their widespread distribution and extensive negative impacts. Many other non-native invasive bivalve species have been poorly studied. A high geographical bias was also present, with a considerable lack of studies in developing countries. The most frequent studies had shorter temporal periods, smaller spatial extents, and more observational data, were field-based, and usually evaluated possible ecological impacts at the individual and population levels. There were 94 publications documenting discernible impacts according to the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). However, 41 of these publications did not provide sufficient data to determine an impact. The most common effects of invasive bivalves on ecosystems were structural alterations, and chemical and physical changes, which are anticipated due to their role as ecosystem engineers. Despite a considerable number of studies in the field and advances in our understanding of some species over the past decade, long-term data and large-scale studies are still needed to understand better the impacts, particularly at the community and ecosystem levels and in less-studied geographic regions. The widespread distribution of several non-native freshwater bivalves, their ongoing introductions, and high ecological and economic impacts demand continued research. Systematic reviews such as this are essential for identifying knowledge gaps and guiding future research to enable a more complete understanding of the ecological implications of invasive bivalves, and the development of effective management strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"99 6\",\"pages\":\"2082-2107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13113\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵物种的引入已成为淡水生态系统中一个日益严重的环境问题,对经济和生态造成了巨大影响。这篇系统性综述涵盖了 2010 年至 2020 年期间的出版物,重点关注非外来入侵淡水双壳类动物,这是淡水中一个特别相关且广泛引入的分类群。我们收集了有关研究最多的物种、研究的主要目的、地理位置、研究持续时间和研究类型的信息。此外,我们还重点评估了所提供的生态学证据的水平、非本地双壳类动物与其他生物的相互作用类型及其影响的分类。共检索到 397 篇出版物。这些研究共涉及 17 种非淡水外来双壳类动物,但大多数研究都集中在珊瑚笛贝(Corbicula fluminea)和多孔笛贝(Dreissena polymorpha)上。对许多其他非本地入侵双壳类物种的研究很少。地域偏差也很严重,发展中国家的研究相当缺乏。最常见的研究时间跨度较短,空间范围较小,观察数据较多,以实地研究为主,通常评估个体和种群层面可能的生态影响。根据外来物种环境影响分类法(EICAT),有 94 篇出版物记录了明显的影响。不过,其中 41 篇出版物没有提供足够的数据来确定影响。入侵双壳类动物对生态系统最常见的影响是结构改变以及化学和物理变化,这是由于它们扮演着生态系统工程师的角色。尽管在过去十年中进行了大量的实地研究,而且我们对一些物种的了解也有了进步,但仍需要长期数据和大规模研究来更好地了解其影响,特别是在群落和生态系统层面以及研究较少的地理区域。几种非本地淡水双壳类动物的广泛分布、它们的不断引入以及对生态和经济的巨大影响要求我们继续开展研究。像本报告这样的系统性综述对于确定知识差距和指导未来研究至关重要,这样才能更全面地了解入侵双壳类动物的生态影响,并制定有效的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of invasive non-native freshwater bivalves

The introduction of invasive species has become an increasing environmental problem in freshwater ecosystems due to the high economic and ecological impacts it has generated. This systematic review covers publications from 2010 to 2020, focusing on non-native invasive freshwater bivalves, a particularly relevant and widespread introduced taxonomic group in fresh waters. We collected information on the most studied species, the main objectives of the studies, their geographical location, study duration, and type of research. Furthermore, we focused on assessing the levels of ecological evidence presented, the type of interactions of non-native bivalves with other organisms and the classification of their impacts. A total of 397 publications were retrieved. The studies addressed a total of 17 species of non-native freshwater bivalves; however, most publications focused on the species Corbicula fluminea and Dreissena polymorpha, which are recognised for their widespread distribution and extensive negative impacts. Many other non-native invasive bivalve species have been poorly studied. A high geographical bias was also present, with a considerable lack of studies in developing countries. The most frequent studies had shorter temporal periods, smaller spatial extents, and more observational data, were field-based, and usually evaluated possible ecological impacts at the individual and population levels. There were 94 publications documenting discernible impacts according to the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). However, 41 of these publications did not provide sufficient data to determine an impact. The most common effects of invasive bivalves on ecosystems were structural alterations, and chemical and physical changes, which are anticipated due to their role as ecosystem engineers. Despite a considerable number of studies in the field and advances in our understanding of some species over the past decade, long-term data and large-scale studies are still needed to understand better the impacts, particularly at the community and ecosystem levels and in less-studied geographic regions. The widespread distribution of several non-native freshwater bivalves, their ongoing introductions, and high ecological and economic impacts demand continued research. Systematic reviews such as this are essential for identifying knowledge gaps and guiding future research to enable a more complete understanding of the ecological implications of invasive bivalves, and the development of effective management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
期刊最新文献
Towards ecosystem-based techniques for tipping point detection. Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion. Testosterone mediates life-history trade-offs in female mammals. Zooming in the plastisphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-plastic interactions in aquatic ecosystems. Archaeocytes in sponges: simple cells of complicated fate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1