以极端人体测量为特征的精英运动员的左心室形态和几何形状。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hellenic Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.007
Eleonora Moccia, Harshil Dhutia, Aneil Malhotra, Efstathios Papatheodorou, Elijah Behr, Rajan Sharma, Michael Papadakis, Sanjay Sharma, Gherardo Finocchiaro
{"title":"以极端人体测量为特征的精英运动员的左心室形态和几何形状。","authors":"Eleonora Moccia, Harshil Dhutia, Aneil Malhotra, Efstathios Papatheodorou, Elijah Behr, Rajan Sharma, Michael Papadakis, Sanjay Sharma, Gherardo Finocchiaro","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the individual impact of BMI and height on LV size and geometry in a cohort of healthy athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a total cohort of 1857 healthy élite athletes (21 ± 5 years, males 70%) investigated with ECG and echocardiogram, we considered three groups: Group 1 n = 50: BMI ≥ 30 and height < 1.90 m; Group 2 n = 87: height ≥ 1.95 m and BMI < 30; control Group 3 n = 243: height < 1.90 m and BMI = 20-29.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BSA was ≤2.3 m<sup>2</sup> in 52% of athletes in group 1 and 47% of athletes in group 2. Athletes in group 1 and in group 2 showed an enlarged LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (57 ± 6 vs 57 ± 4 vs 53 ± 4 mm in Group 3); 50% of athletes in group 1 and 38% of athletes in group 2 exhibited a LVEDD > 57 mm (p = 0.23). LV wall thickness was higher in group 1 (11 ± 1 vs 10 ± 2 mm in Group 2, p = 0.001). Concentric hypertrophy or concentric remodelling was found in 20% of athletes in group 1 vs 7% of athletes in group 2 (p = 0.04). Athletes of group 1 with BSA ≤ 2.3 m<sup>2</sup> showed lower LVEDD (53 ± 5 vs 60 ± 5 mm, p < 0.001), similar LV wall thickness (10 ± 1 vs 11 ± 1 mm, p = 0.128) and higher prevalence of concentric hypertrophy or concentric remodelling (31% vs 8%, p = 0.04) compared to those with BSA > 2.3 m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Athletes with high BMI have similar LV dimensions but greater wall thickness and higher prevalence of concentric remodelling compared to very tall athletes. Athletes with high BMI and large BSA have the widest LV dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular morphology and geometry in élite athletes characterised by extreme anthropometry.\",\"authors\":\"Eleonora Moccia, Harshil Dhutia, Aneil Malhotra, Efstathios Papatheodorou, Elijah Behr, Rajan Sharma, Michael Papadakis, Sanjay Sharma, Gherardo Finocchiaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the individual impact of BMI and height on LV size and geometry in a cohort of healthy athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a total cohort of 1857 healthy élite athletes (21 ± 5 years, males 70%) investigated with ECG and echocardiogram, we considered three groups: Group 1 n = 50: BMI ≥ 30 and height < 1.90 m; Group 2 n = 87: height ≥ 1.95 m and BMI < 30; control Group 3 n = 243: height < 1.90 m and BMI = 20-29.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BSA was ≤2.3 m<sup>2</sup> in 52% of athletes in group 1 and 47% of athletes in group 2. Athletes in group 1 and in group 2 showed an enlarged LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (57 ± 6 vs 57 ± 4 vs 53 ± 4 mm in Group 3); 50% of athletes in group 1 and 38% of athletes in group 2 exhibited a LVEDD > 57 mm (p = 0.23). LV wall thickness was higher in group 1 (11 ± 1 vs 10 ± 2 mm in Group 2, p = 0.001). Concentric hypertrophy or concentric remodelling was found in 20% of athletes in group 1 vs 7% of athletes in group 2 (p = 0.04). Athletes of group 1 with BSA ≤ 2.3 m<sup>2</sup> showed lower LVEDD (53 ± 5 vs 60 ± 5 mm, p < 0.001), similar LV wall thickness (10 ± 1 vs 11 ± 1 mm, p = 0.128) and higher prevalence of concentric hypertrophy or concentric remodelling (31% vs 8%, p = 0.04) compared to those with BSA > 2.3 m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Athletes with high BMI have similar LV dimensions but greater wall thickness and higher prevalence of concentric remodelling compared to very tall athletes. Athletes with high BMI and large BSA have the widest LV dimensions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨体重指数和身高对健康运动员队列中左心室大小和几何形状的个体影响:我们对 1857 名健康精英运动员(21 ± 5 岁,男性占 70%)进行了心电图和超声心动图检查,并将其分为三组:第 1 组 n = 50:体重指数≥ 30,身高结果:第 1 组 52% 的运动员和第 2 组 47% 的运动员的 BSA 均小于 2.3 平方米。第 1 组和第 2 组运动员的左心室舒张末期直径(LVEDD)增大(第 1 组为 57 ± 6 mm vs 第 2 组为 57 ± 4 mm vs 第 3 组为 53 ± 4 mm);第 1 组 50%的运动员和第 2 组 38%的运动员的左心室舒张末期直径大于 57 mm(P = 0.23)。第 1 组的左心室壁厚度更高(11 ± 1 mm,第 2 组为 10 ± 2 mm,p = 0.001)。第 1 组 20% 的运动员与第 2 组 7% 的运动员相比存在同心性肥厚或同心性重塑(p = 0.04)。BSA≤2.3 m2的第1组运动员的LVEDD较低(53 ± 5 vs 60 ± 5 mm,p 2.3 m2):高体重指数运动员的左心室尺寸与非常高的运动员相似,但左心室壁厚度更大,同心重塑的发生率更高。高体重指数和大体重指数运动员的左心室尺寸最宽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left ventricular morphology and geometry in élite athletes characterised by extreme anthropometry.

Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the individual impact of BMI and height on LV size and geometry in a cohort of healthy athletes.

Methods: From a total cohort of 1857 healthy élite athletes (21 ± 5 years, males 70%) investigated with ECG and echocardiogram, we considered three groups: Group 1 n = 50: BMI ≥ 30 and height < 1.90 m; Group 2 n = 87: height ≥ 1.95 m and BMI < 30; control Group 3 n = 243: height < 1.90 m and BMI = 20-29.

Results: BSA was ≤2.3 m2 in 52% of athletes in group 1 and 47% of athletes in group 2. Athletes in group 1 and in group 2 showed an enlarged LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (57 ± 6 vs 57 ± 4 vs 53 ± 4 mm in Group 3); 50% of athletes in group 1 and 38% of athletes in group 2 exhibited a LVEDD > 57 mm (p = 0.23). LV wall thickness was higher in group 1 (11 ± 1 vs 10 ± 2 mm in Group 2, p = 0.001). Concentric hypertrophy or concentric remodelling was found in 20% of athletes in group 1 vs 7% of athletes in group 2 (p = 0.04). Athletes of group 1 with BSA ≤ 2.3 m2 showed lower LVEDD (53 ± 5 vs 60 ± 5 mm, p < 0.001), similar LV wall thickness (10 ± 1 vs 11 ± 1 mm, p = 0.128) and higher prevalence of concentric hypertrophy or concentric remodelling (31% vs 8%, p = 0.04) compared to those with BSA > 2.3 m2.

Conclusion: Athletes with high BMI have similar LV dimensions but greater wall thickness and higher prevalence of concentric remodelling compared to very tall athletes. Athletes with high BMI and large BSA have the widest LV dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant strategy in a low organ donation environment: Single center experience. Impact of three-month treatment with pitavastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a prospective observational study. Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of giant cavernous hemangioma of the right ventricle. Comparing the predictive ability of GRACE 2.0 and GRACE 3.0 scores in a Greek cohort of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome. New guidelines of EACTS/STS on aortic disease: A useful tool for the management of "aortic organ" disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1