膳食血糖指数和血糖负荷与妊娠糖尿病风险的关系:系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Gynecological Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564
Yu Zhang, Huanrong Feng, Xuefeng Li, Qiong Chen, Ruyue Shao, Chengli Wang, Yimeng Gao
{"title":"膳食血糖指数和血糖负荷与妊娠糖尿病风险的关系:系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。","authors":"Yu Zhang, Huanrong Feng, Xuefeng Li, Qiong Chen, Ruyue Shao, Chengli Wang, Yimeng Gao","doi":"10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively assess the dose-response association between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched up to May 29, 2024. Studies with at least three exposure categories were included. Dose-response analysis was also performed when covariates were adjusted in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 39,720 pregnant women were included. A linear relationship was found between GI and the risk of GDM (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.77, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> = .0923). However, association was not significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, <i>p</i> = .8000). For every unit increase in GI (range 0-30), GDM risk increased by 0.29%. After adjusting for covariates, the linear relationship persisted (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.95, <i>P<sub>non-linearity</sub></i> = .084) with no significant association (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.08, <i>p</i> = .7775). For GL, a linear relationship was also found (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.17, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> =.1245), but GL was not significantly associated with GDM risk (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.63, <i>p</i> = .1049). The risk of GDM increased by 0.63% per unit increase in GL. After covariate adjustment, a significant association was observed (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.28, <i>p</i> = .0122).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant association between GI and GDM risk was found. After adjusting for covariates, GL shows a significant association with GDM risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dietary GL in managing the risk of GDM. Future research should continue to explore these relationships with standardized diagnostic criteria and robust adjustment for potential confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12865,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Endocrinology","volume":"40 1","pages":"2375564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Zhang, Huanrong Feng, Xuefeng Li, Qiong Chen, Ruyue Shao, Chengli Wang, Yimeng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively assess the dose-response association between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched up to May 29, 2024. Studies with at least three exposure categories were included. Dose-response analysis was also performed when covariates were adjusted in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 39,720 pregnant women were included. A linear relationship was found between GI and the risk of GDM (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.77, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> = .0923). However, association was not significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, <i>p</i> = .8000). For every unit increase in GI (range 0-30), GDM risk increased by 0.29%. After adjusting for covariates, the linear relationship persisted (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.95, <i>P<sub>non-linearity</sub></i> = .084) with no significant association (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.08, <i>p</i> = .7775). For GL, a linear relationship was also found (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.17, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> =.1245), but GL was not significantly associated with GDM risk (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.63, <i>p</i> = .1049). The risk of GDM increased by 0.63% per unit increase in GL. After covariate adjustment, a significant association was observed (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.28, <i>p</i> = .0122).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant association between GI and GDM risk was found. After adjusting for covariates, GL shows a significant association with GDM risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dietary GL in managing the risk of GDM. Future research should continue to explore these relationships with standardized diagnostic criteria and robust adjustment for potential confounders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecological Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"2375564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecological Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecological Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的全面评估膳食血糖生成指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)风险之间的剂量-反应关系:方法:检索了截至 2024 年 5 月 29 日的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、WanFang 和 VIP 数据库。纳入了至少有三个暴露类别的研究。在对纳入研究的协变量进行调整后,还进行了剂量-反应分析:结果:共纳入 13 项研究,涉及 39720 名孕妇。发现 GI 与 GDM 风险之间存在线性关系(χ2 = 4.77,P 非线性 = .0923)。然而,两者之间的关系并不显著(χ2 = 0.06,P = 0.8000)。GI 每增加一个单位(范围 0-30),GDM 风险增加 0.29%。调整协变量后,线性关系仍然存在(χ2 = 4.95,P 非线性 = .084),但无明显关联(χ2 = 0.08,P = .7775)。对于 GL,也发现了线性关系(χ2 = 4.17,P 非线性 = .1245),但 GL 与 GDM 风险无显著相关性(χ2 = 2.63,P = .1049)。GL 每增加一个单位,患 GDM 的风险就增加 0.63%。经过协变量调整后,观察到两者之间存在明显关联(χ2 = 6.28,P = .0122):结论:未发现 GI 与 GDM 风险之间存在明显关联。结论:未发现消化道疾病与 GDM 风险之间有明显的关联,在调整了协变量后,GL 与 GDM 风险有明显的关联。我们的研究结果强调了在控制 GDM 风险时考虑膳食 GL 的重要性。未来的研究应继续通过标准化诊断标准和对潜在混杂因素的稳健调整来探索这些关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Objective: To comprehensively assess the dose-response association between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched up to May 29, 2024. Studies with at least three exposure categories were included. Dose-response analysis was also performed when covariates were adjusted in the included studies.

Results: Thirteen studies involving 39,720 pregnant women were included. A linear relationship was found between GI and the risk of GDM (χ2 = 4.77, Pnon-linearity = .0923). However, association was not significant (χ2 = 0.06, p = .8000). For every unit increase in GI (range 0-30), GDM risk increased by 0.29%. After adjusting for covariates, the linear relationship persisted (χ2 = 4.95, Pnon-linearity = .084) with no significant association (χ2 = 0.08, p = .7775). For GL, a linear relationship was also found (χ2 = 4.17, Pnon-linearity =.1245), but GL was not significantly associated with GDM risk (χ2 = 2.63, p = .1049). The risk of GDM increased by 0.63% per unit increase in GL. After covariate adjustment, a significant association was observed (χ2 = 6.28, p = .0122).

Conclusion: No significant association between GI and GDM risk was found. After adjusting for covariates, GL shows a significant association with GDM risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dietary GL in managing the risk of GDM. Future research should continue to explore these relationships with standardized diagnostic criteria and robust adjustment for potential confounders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecological Endocrinology
Gynecological Endocrinology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynecological Endocrinology , the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, covers all the experimental, clinical and therapeutic aspects of this ever more important discipline. It includes, amongst others, papers relating to the control and function of the different endocrine glands in females, the effects of reproductive events on the endocrine system, and the consequences of endocrine disorders on reproduction
期刊最新文献
Statement of Retraction: Combined metformin and clomiphene citrate versus highly purified FSH for ovulation induction in clomiphene-resistant PCOS women: a randomised controlled trial. Statement of Retraction: Minimal stimulation or clomiphene citrate as first-line therapy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Treatment of ovarian damage induced by chemotherapeutic drugs in female rats with G-CSF and platelet-rich plasma(PRP): an immunohistochemical study correlation with novel marker INSL-3. Update on the combination of myo-inositol/d-chiro-inositol for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Comparative effects of the antioxidant glutathione with metformin and Diane-35 on hormonal, metabolic, and inflammatory indicators in a DHEA-induced PCOS rat model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1