{"title":"膳食血糖指数和血糖负荷与妊娠糖尿病风险的关系:系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。","authors":"Yu Zhang, Huanrong Feng, Xuefeng Li, Qiong Chen, Ruyue Shao, Chengli Wang, Yimeng Gao","doi":"10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively assess the dose-response association between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched up to May 29, 2024. Studies with at least three exposure categories were included. Dose-response analysis was also performed when covariates were adjusted in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 39,720 pregnant women were included. A linear relationship was found between GI and the risk of GDM (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.77, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> = .0923). However, association was not significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, <i>p</i> = .8000). For every unit increase in GI (range 0-30), GDM risk increased by 0.29%. After adjusting for covariates, the linear relationship persisted (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.95, <i>P<sub>non-linearity</sub></i> = .084) with no significant association (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.08, <i>p</i> = .7775). For GL, a linear relationship was also found (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.17, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> =.1245), but GL was not significantly associated with GDM risk (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.63, <i>p</i> = .1049). The risk of GDM increased by 0.63% per unit increase in GL. After covariate adjustment, a significant association was observed (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.28, <i>p</i> = .0122).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant association between GI and GDM risk was found. After adjusting for covariates, GL shows a significant association with GDM risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dietary GL in managing the risk of GDM. Future research should continue to explore these relationships with standardized diagnostic criteria and robust adjustment for potential confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12865,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Endocrinology","volume":"40 1","pages":"2375564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Zhang, Huanrong Feng, Xuefeng Li, Qiong Chen, Ruyue Shao, Chengli Wang, Yimeng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively assess the dose-response association between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched up to May 29, 2024. Studies with at least three exposure categories were included. Dose-response analysis was also performed when covariates were adjusted in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 39,720 pregnant women were included. A linear relationship was found between GI and the risk of GDM (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.77, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> = .0923). However, association was not significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, <i>p</i> = .8000). For every unit increase in GI (range 0-30), GDM risk increased by 0.29%. After adjusting for covariates, the linear relationship persisted (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.95, <i>P<sub>non-linearity</sub></i> = .084) with no significant association (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.08, <i>p</i> = .7775). For GL, a linear relationship was also found (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.17, <i>P</i><sub>non-linearity</sub> =.1245), but GL was not significantly associated with GDM risk (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.63, <i>p</i> = .1049). The risk of GDM increased by 0.63% per unit increase in GL. After covariate adjustment, a significant association was observed (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.28, <i>p</i> = .0122).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant association between GI and GDM risk was found. After adjusting for covariates, GL shows a significant association with GDM risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dietary GL in managing the risk of GDM. Future research should continue to explore these relationships with standardized diagnostic criteria and robust adjustment for potential confounders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecological Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"2375564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecological Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecological Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2375564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Objective: To comprehensively assess the dose-response association between dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched up to May 29, 2024. Studies with at least three exposure categories were included. Dose-response analysis was also performed when covariates were adjusted in the included studies.
Results: Thirteen studies involving 39,720 pregnant women were included. A linear relationship was found between GI and the risk of GDM (χ2 = 4.77, Pnon-linearity = .0923). However, association was not significant (χ2 = 0.06, p = .8000). For every unit increase in GI (range 0-30), GDM risk increased by 0.29%. After adjusting for covariates, the linear relationship persisted (χ2 = 4.95, Pnon-linearity = .084) with no significant association (χ2 = 0.08, p = .7775). For GL, a linear relationship was also found (χ2 = 4.17, Pnon-linearity =.1245), but GL was not significantly associated with GDM risk (χ2 = 2.63, p = .1049). The risk of GDM increased by 0.63% per unit increase in GL. After covariate adjustment, a significant association was observed (χ2 = 6.28, p = .0122).
Conclusion: No significant association between GI and GDM risk was found. After adjusting for covariates, GL shows a significant association with GDM risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dietary GL in managing the risk of GDM. Future research should continue to explore these relationships with standardized diagnostic criteria and robust adjustment for potential confounders.
期刊介绍:
Gynecological Endocrinology , the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, covers all the experimental, clinical and therapeutic aspects of this ever more important discipline. It includes, amongst others, papers relating to the control and function of the different endocrine glands in females, the effects of reproductive events on the endocrine system, and the consequences of endocrine disorders on reproduction