绝经后妇女超低剂量连续联合雌二醇和地屈孕酮:安全性和耐受性综合分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Gynecological Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1080/09513590.2024.2375577
Tetiana Tatarchuk, John C Stevenson, Qi Yu, Elke Kahler, Marcelo Graziano Custodio, Mulan Ren, Rossella E Nappi, Viktoriya Karpova, Tommaso Simoncini
{"title":"绝经后妇女超低剂量连续联合雌二醇和地屈孕酮:安全性和耐受性综合分析。","authors":"Tetiana Tatarchuk, John C Stevenson, Qi Yu, Elke Kahler, Marcelo Graziano Custodio, Mulan Ren, Rossella E Nappi, Viktoriya Karpova, Tommaso Simoncini","doi":"10.1080/09513590.2024.2375577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. <b>Methods:</b> This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, <i>n</i> = 736; placebo, <i>n</i> = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":12865,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Endocrinology","volume":"40 1","pages":"2375577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultra-low-dose continuous combined estradiol and dydrogesterone in postmenopausal women: A pooled safety and tolerability analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tetiana Tatarchuk, John C Stevenson, Qi Yu, Elke Kahler, Marcelo Graziano Custodio, Mulan Ren, Rossella E Nappi, Viktoriya Karpova, Tommaso Simoncini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09513590.2024.2375577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. <b>Methods:</b> This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, <i>n</i> = 736; placebo, <i>n</i> = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecological Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"2375577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecological Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2375577\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecological Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2375577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估绝经后妇女服用超低剂量雌二醇和地屈孕酮(E0.5 毫克/D2.5 毫克)的安全性和耐受性。方法:本研究对三项临床研究的数据进行了汇总分析,评估了连续联合使用超低剂量雌二醇和地屈孕酮对绝经后妇女的影响。参与者接受 E0.5 毫克/D2.5 毫克或安慰剂治疗 13 周(双盲、随机、欧洲研究),接受 E0.5 毫克/D2.5 毫克或安慰剂治疗 12 周(双盲、随机、中国研究),或接受 E0.5 毫克/D2.5 毫克治疗 52 周(开放标签、欧洲研究)。安全性结果包括治疗突发不良事件(TEAEs)、治疗突发严重不良事件(TESAEs)、因TEAE而中断治疗以及特别关注的不良事件(AESIs)。结果:共有 1027 名妇女被纳入汇总分析(E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg,n = 736;安慰剂,n = 291)。E0.5毫克/D2.5毫克组的平均治疗时间为288.9天,安慰剂组为86.6天。E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg组和安慰剂组出现≥1次TEAE的女性比例相似(分别为50.1% vs 49.5%)。12名(1.6%)接受E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg治疗的女性和9名(3.1%)接受安慰剂治疗的女性发生了TESAE。两组中止研究治疗的情况都不常见(E0.5 毫克/D2.5 毫克:1.5%;安慰剂:2.4%)。与安慰剂组相比,E0.5 毫克/D2.5 毫克组乳房疼痛的发生率更高(2.0% 对 0.3%),子宫出血的发生率也更高(6.5% 对 2.4%)。痤疮、多毛症和体重增加的发生率在各组之间相似。结论在三项研究中,绝经后妇女对超低剂量雌二醇加地屈孕酮的耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比,TEAEs或TESAEs没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultra-low-dose continuous combined estradiol and dydrogesterone in postmenopausal women: A pooled safety and tolerability analysis.

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. Methods: This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Results: Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 736; placebo, n = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. Conclusions: Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecological Endocrinology
Gynecological Endocrinology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynecological Endocrinology , the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, covers all the experimental, clinical and therapeutic aspects of this ever more important discipline. It includes, amongst others, papers relating to the control and function of the different endocrine glands in females, the effects of reproductive events on the endocrine system, and the consequences of endocrine disorders on reproduction
期刊最新文献
Statement of Retraction: Combined metformin and clomiphene citrate versus highly purified FSH for ovulation induction in clomiphene-resistant PCOS women: a randomised controlled trial. Statement of Retraction: Minimal stimulation or clomiphene citrate as first-line therapy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Treatment of ovarian damage induced by chemotherapeutic drugs in female rats with G-CSF and platelet-rich plasma(PRP): an immunohistochemical study correlation with novel marker INSL-3. Update on the combination of myo-inositol/d-chiro-inositol for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Comparative effects of the antioxidant glutathione with metformin and Diane-35 on hormonal, metabolic, and inflammatory indicators in a DHEA-induced PCOS rat model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1