管理控制系统研究五十年:文献和研究议程的文献计量学回顾

Elisa Truant, Edoardo Crocco, Francesca Culasso, Safiya Alshibani
{"title":"管理控制系统研究五十年:文献和研究议程的文献计量学回顾","authors":"Elisa Truant, Edoardo Crocco, Francesca Culasso, Safiya Alshibani","doi":"10.1108/ijppm-07-2023-0334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The popularity of Management Control Systems (MCS) has increased due to rising uncertainty in business operations. They help companies implement strategies, manage information and incentivize managers with common goals. Therefore, the research aims to take stock of the evolution of studies on MCS adoption, identifying trends and future avenues.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>While a few systematic literature reviews have investigated the implications of MCS adoption amid specific contexts, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the whole research stream is lacking. Consequently, our study analyzes relevant scientific literature on the topic of MCS from 1970 to 2022, through the use of VOSviewer, R Bibliometrix and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to visualize the bibliometric results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study provides a comprehensive overview of key emerging topics in MCS literature and the ways in which they have developed over the decades, along with a structured research agenda built upon the literature gaps found amid current and past scientific production. It does so by analyzing scientific production from multiple bibliometric aspects and advanced text-mining techniques to extract common emerging themes from the dataset.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no attempt has yet been made to synthesize MCS literature through a bibliometric review. The bibliometric perspective on MCS enhances scholars' understanding of the historical path and future trends of the literature stream, while helping practitioners update existing MCS conceptualizations in light of contemporary changes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifty years of management control systems research: a bibliometric review of the literature and research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Truant, Edoardo Crocco, Francesca Culasso, Safiya Alshibani\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijppm-07-2023-0334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The popularity of Management Control Systems (MCS) has increased due to rising uncertainty in business operations. They help companies implement strategies, manage information and incentivize managers with common goals. Therefore, the research aims to take stock of the evolution of studies on MCS adoption, identifying trends and future avenues.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>While a few systematic literature reviews have investigated the implications of MCS adoption amid specific contexts, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the whole research stream is lacking. Consequently, our study analyzes relevant scientific literature on the topic of MCS from 1970 to 2022, through the use of VOSviewer, R Bibliometrix and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to visualize the bibliometric results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The study provides a comprehensive overview of key emerging topics in MCS literature and the ways in which they have developed over the decades, along with a structured research agenda built upon the literature gaps found amid current and past scientific production. It does so by analyzing scientific production from multiple bibliometric aspects and advanced text-mining techniques to extract common emerging themes from the dataset.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no attempt has yet been made to synthesize MCS literature through a bibliometric review. The bibliometric perspective on MCS enhances scholars' understanding of the historical path and future trends of the literature stream, while helping practitioners update existing MCS conceptualizations in light of contemporary changes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-07-2023-0334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-07-2023-0334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 由于企业运营中不确定性的增加,管理控制系统(MCS)越来越受欢迎。管理控制系统有助于企业实施战略、管理信息并以共同的目标激励管理人员。因此,本研究旨在总结有关采用管理控制系统的研究演变情况,确定发展趋势和未来途径。设计/方法/途径虽然有一些系统性文献综述调查了在特定情况下采用管理控制系统的影响,但缺乏对整个研究流的全面文献计量分析。因此,我们的研究通过使用 VOSviewer、R Bibliometrix 和 Latent Dirichlet Allocation 来可视化文献计量结果,分析了 1970 年至 2022 年有关监控监主题的相关科学文献。研究结果本研究全面概述了监控监文献中的关键新兴主题及其几十年来的发展方式,并根据当前和过去科学成果中的文献缺口提出了结构化研究议程。它从多个文献计量学方面分析科学成果,并采用先进的文本挖掘技术,从数据集中提取共同的新兴主题。从文献计量学的角度对监控监进行分析,可以增强学者对文献流的历史轨迹和未来趋势的理解,同时帮助从业人员根据当代变化更新现有的监控监概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fifty years of management control systems research: a bibliometric review of the literature and research agenda

Purpose

The popularity of Management Control Systems (MCS) has increased due to rising uncertainty in business operations. They help companies implement strategies, manage information and incentivize managers with common goals. Therefore, the research aims to take stock of the evolution of studies on MCS adoption, identifying trends and future avenues.

Design/methodology/approach

While a few systematic literature reviews have investigated the implications of MCS adoption amid specific contexts, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the whole research stream is lacking. Consequently, our study analyzes relevant scientific literature on the topic of MCS from 1970 to 2022, through the use of VOSviewer, R Bibliometrix and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to visualize the bibliometric results.

Findings

The study provides a comprehensive overview of key emerging topics in MCS literature and the ways in which they have developed over the decades, along with a structured research agenda built upon the literature gaps found amid current and past scientific production. It does so by analyzing scientific production from multiple bibliometric aspects and advanced text-mining techniques to extract common emerging themes from the dataset.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no attempt has yet been made to synthesize MCS literature through a bibliometric review. The bibliometric perspective on MCS enhances scholars' understanding of the historical path and future trends of the literature stream, while helping practitioners update existing MCS conceptualizations in light of contemporary changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.70%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: ■Organisational design and methods ■Performance management ■Performance measurement tools and techniques ■Process analysis, engineering and re-engineering ■Quality and business excellence management Articles can address these topics theoretically or empirically through either a descriptive or critical approach. The co-Editors support articles that significantly bring new knowledge to the area both for academics and practitioners. The material for publication in IJPPM should be written in a manner which makes it accessible to its entire wide-ranging readership. Submissions of highly technical or mathematically-oriented papers are discouraged.
期刊最新文献
Industry 5.0's pillars and Lean Six Sigma: mapping the current interrelationship and future research directions Exploring the critical drivers of blockchain technology adoption in Indian industries using the best-worst method Process mining-enhanced quality management in food processing industries Enhancing new service development effectiveness: the role of customer participation and the moderating effects of empowerment and satisfaction Emotional intelligence as an antecedent of employees’ job outcomes through knowledge sharing in IT-ITeS firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1