化疗反应可预测采用多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(DCF)新辅助治疗后再手术的食管鳞状细胞癌的预后:一家研究所的长期研究结果。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01062-y
Yasuyoshi Sato, Kazuhiko Mori, Shinichiro Atsumi, Kei Sakamoto, Shuichiro Oya, Asami Okamoto, Masayuki Urabe, Yoshiyuki Miwa, Shoh Yajima, Koichi Yagi, Sachiyo Nomura, Hiroharu Yamashita, Yasuyuki Seto
{"title":"化疗反应可预测采用多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(DCF)新辅助治疗后再手术的食管鳞状细胞癌的预后:一家研究所的长期研究结果。","authors":"Yasuyoshi Sato, Kazuhiko Mori, Shinichiro Atsumi, Kei Sakamoto, Shuichiro Oya, Asami Okamoto, Masayuki Urabe, Yoshiyuki Miwa, Shoh Yajima, Koichi Yagi, Sachiyo Nomura, Hiroharu Yamashita, Yasuyuki Seto","doi":"10.1007/s10388-024-01062-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) followed by surgery has been considered a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on the results of a phase III trial (JCOG9907) in Japan. Subsequently, the phase III NExT trial (JCOG1109) revealed the survival benefit of the neoadjuvant DCF regimen, which adds docetaxel to FP, and it became a standard treatment. However, the long-term results and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant DCF therapy in the real world are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated 50 patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant DCF therapy from July 2012 to December 2017 at The University of Tokyo Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 32.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.0-NA] and 10.0 months (95% CI 6.3-15.6), respectively. Median OS [not reached (95% CI 31.5-NA) vs. 21.4 months (95% CI 13.5-33.0); p = 0.028] and PFS [83.3 months (95% CI 6.4-NA) vs. 7.4 months (95% CI 6.0-12.8] were significantly longer in patients with an objective response than in non-responders. Of 44 surgical cases, median PFS tended to be longer in pathological lymph node metastasis-negative patients. Conversely, survival did not differ according to cStage (II/III vs. IV) or the average relative dose intensity (ARDI, ≥ 85% vs. < 85%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The response to neoadjuvant DCF therapy could predict patient prognosis. Additionally, pN+ tended to increase the recurrence risk, whereas cStage and ARDI did not influence survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to chemotherapy could predict the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) followed by surgery: long-term results in a single institute.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuyoshi Sato, Kazuhiko Mori, Shinichiro Atsumi, Kei Sakamoto, Shuichiro Oya, Asami Okamoto, Masayuki Urabe, Yoshiyuki Miwa, Shoh Yajima, Koichi Yagi, Sachiyo Nomura, Hiroharu Yamashita, Yasuyuki Seto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10388-024-01062-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) followed by surgery has been considered a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on the results of a phase III trial (JCOG9907) in Japan. Subsequently, the phase III NExT trial (JCOG1109) revealed the survival benefit of the neoadjuvant DCF regimen, which adds docetaxel to FP, and it became a standard treatment. However, the long-term results and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant DCF therapy in the real world are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated 50 patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant DCF therapy from July 2012 to December 2017 at The University of Tokyo Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 32.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.0-NA] and 10.0 months (95% CI 6.3-15.6), respectively. Median OS [not reached (95% CI 31.5-NA) vs. 21.4 months (95% CI 13.5-33.0); p = 0.028] and PFS [83.3 months (95% CI 6.4-NA) vs. 7.4 months (95% CI 6.0-12.8] were significantly longer in patients with an objective response than in non-responders. Of 44 surgical cases, median PFS tended to be longer in pathological lymph node metastasis-negative patients. Conversely, survival did not differ according to cStage (II/III vs. IV) or the average relative dose intensity (ARDI, ≥ 85% vs. < 85%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The response to neoadjuvant DCF therapy could predict patient prognosis. Additionally, pN+ tended to increase the recurrence risk, whereas cStage and ARDI did not influence survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esophagus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405498/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01062-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01062-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据日本一项III期试验(JCOG9907)的结果,术前使用5-氟尿嘧啶和顺铂(FP)化疗,然后进行手术,一直被认为是II/III期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的标准治疗方法。随后,III 期 NExT 试验(JCOG1109)揭示了在 FP 基础上增加多西他赛的新辅助 DCF 方案的生存获益,并将其作为标准治疗方法。然而,在现实世界中,新辅助 DCF 治疗的长期效果和预后因素尚不清楚:我们回顾性调查了2012年7月至2017年12月在东京大学医院接受新辅助DCF治疗的50例ESCC患者:中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为32.3个月[95%置信区间(CI)21.0-NA]和10.0个月(95% CI 6.3-15.6)。客观应答患者的中位OS[未达到(95% CI 31.5-NA)vs 21.4个月(95% CI 13.5-33.0);p = 0.028]和PFS[83.3个月(95% CI 6.4-NA)vs 7.4个月(95% CI 6.0-12.8)]明显长于无应答患者。在44例手术病例中,病理淋巴结转移阴性患者的中位生存期往往更长。相反,c分期(II/III期与IV期)或平均相对剂量强度(ARDI,≥85%与≥85%)对生存期没有影响。 讨论:对新辅助DCF治疗的反应可预测患者的预后。此外,pN+往往会增加复发风险,而c分期和ARDI并不影响生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response to chemotherapy could predict the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) followed by surgery: long-term results in a single institute.

Background: Preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) followed by surgery has been considered a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on the results of a phase III trial (JCOG9907) in Japan. Subsequently, the phase III NExT trial (JCOG1109) revealed the survival benefit of the neoadjuvant DCF regimen, which adds docetaxel to FP, and it became a standard treatment. However, the long-term results and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant DCF therapy in the real world are unknown.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated 50 patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant DCF therapy from July 2012 to December 2017 at The University of Tokyo Hospital.

Results: Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 32.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.0-NA] and 10.0 months (95% CI 6.3-15.6), respectively. Median OS [not reached (95% CI 31.5-NA) vs. 21.4 months (95% CI 13.5-33.0); p = 0.028] and PFS [83.3 months (95% CI 6.4-NA) vs. 7.4 months (95% CI 6.0-12.8] were significantly longer in patients with an objective response than in non-responders. Of 44 surgical cases, median PFS tended to be longer in pathological lymph node metastasis-negative patients. Conversely, survival did not differ according to cStage (II/III vs. IV) or the average relative dose intensity (ARDI, ≥ 85% vs. < 85%).

Discussion: The response to neoadjuvant DCF therapy could predict patient prognosis. Additionally, pN+ tended to increase the recurrence risk, whereas cStage and ARDI did not influence survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison of proton-based Definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study. Outcomes of definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy for cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study. Two onset types of achalasia and the long-term course to diagnosis. Multicenter retrospective analysis of complications and risk factors in endoscopic resection for esophageal cancer across Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1