比较沙特阿拉伯一家学术机构在 COVID-19 大流行早期和晚期发生的院内心脏骤停的特征和结果。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.06.005
Abdullah Bakhsh MBBS , Saleh Binmahfooz MBBS , Ibtihal Balubaid MBBS , Hind Aljedani MBBS , Mohsin Khared MBBS , Abdulrahman Alghamdi MBBS , Saleh Alabdulwahab MBBS , Mohannad Alzahrani MBBS , Aziza Abushosha MBBS , Layan Alharbi MBBS , Reem Baarma MBBS , Elmoiz Babekir MBBS
{"title":"比较沙特阿拉伯一家学术机构在 COVID-19 大流行早期和晚期发生的院内心脏骤停的特征和结果。","authors":"Abdullah Bakhsh MBBS ,&nbsp;Saleh Binmahfooz MBBS ,&nbsp;Ibtihal Balubaid MBBS ,&nbsp;Hind Aljedani MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohsin Khared MBBS ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Alghamdi MBBS ,&nbsp;Saleh Alabdulwahab MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohannad Alzahrani MBBS ,&nbsp;Aziza Abushosha MBBS ,&nbsp;Layan Alharbi MBBS ,&nbsp;Reem Baarma MBBS ,&nbsp;Elmoiz Babekir MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced major changes in the resuscitation practices of cardiac arrest victims.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who sustained in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (2020) with those during the late COVID-19 pandemic period (2021).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective review of adult patients sustaining IHCA at a single academic centre. We compared characteristics and outcomes of IHCA for 5 months in 2020 with those experiencing IHCA for 5 months in 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients sustaining IHCA during the early COVID-19 pandemic period had higher rates of delayed epinephrine administration of more than 5 min (13.4% vs. 1.9%; p &lt; 0.01), more frequent delays in the initiation of chest compressions (55.6% vs. 17.9%; p &lt; 0.01), and were intubated less often (23.0% vs. 59.3%; p &lt; 0.01). In terms of outcomes, both return of spontaneous circulation (35.8% vs. 51.2%; p &lt; 0.01) and survival to hospital discharge rates (13.9% vs. 30.2%; p &lt; 0.01) were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The early COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with delays in epinephrine administration and chest compression initiation for IHCA. Moreover, both return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest during the early and late COVID-19 pandemic at an academic institution in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Bakhsh MBBS ,&nbsp;Saleh Binmahfooz MBBS ,&nbsp;Ibtihal Balubaid MBBS ,&nbsp;Hind Aljedani MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohsin Khared MBBS ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Alghamdi MBBS ,&nbsp;Saleh Alabdulwahab MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohannad Alzahrani MBBS ,&nbsp;Aziza Abushosha MBBS ,&nbsp;Layan Alharbi MBBS ,&nbsp;Reem Baarma MBBS ,&nbsp;Elmoiz Babekir MBBS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced major changes in the resuscitation practices of cardiac arrest victims.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who sustained in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (2020) with those during the late COVID-19 pandemic period (2021).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective review of adult patients sustaining IHCA at a single academic centre. We compared characteristics and outcomes of IHCA for 5 months in 2020 with those experiencing IHCA for 5 months in 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients sustaining IHCA during the early COVID-19 pandemic period had higher rates of delayed epinephrine administration of more than 5 min (13.4% vs. 1.9%; p &lt; 0.01), more frequent delays in the initiation of chest compressions (55.6% vs. 17.9%; p &lt; 0.01), and were intubated less often (23.0% vs. 59.3%; p &lt; 0.01). In terms of outcomes, both return of spontaneous circulation (35.8% vs. 51.2%; p &lt; 0.01) and survival to hospital discharge rates (13.9% vs. 30.2%; p &lt; 0.01) were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The early COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with delays in epinephrine administration and chest compression initiation for IHCA. Moreover, both return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424001188\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424001188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:我们旨在比较 COVID-19 大流行早期(2020 年)与 COVID-19 大流行晚期(2021 年)院内心脏骤停(IHCA)患者的特征和预后:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是在一家学术中心发生 IHCA 的成年患者。我们比较了 2020 年 5 个月的 IHCA 患者与 2021 年 5 个月的 IHCA 患者的特征和结果:结果:在 COVID-19 大流行早期发生 IHCA 的患者中,肾上腺素给药延迟超过 5 分钟的比例较高(13.4% 对 1.9%;P 结论:COVID-19 大流行早期发生 IHCA 的患者中,肾上腺素给药延迟超过 5 分钟的比例较高(13.4% 对 1.9%;P):COVID-19 大流行早期与 IHCA 时肾上腺素给药和胸外按压启动延迟有关。此外,在 COVID-19 大流行早期,自发循环恢复率和出院存活率都较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest during the early and late COVID-19 pandemic at an academic institution in Saudi Arabia

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced major changes in the resuscitation practices of cardiac arrest victims.

Aim

We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who sustained in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (2020) with those during the late COVID-19 pandemic period (2021).

Methods

This was a retrospective review of adult patients sustaining IHCA at a single academic centre. We compared characteristics and outcomes of IHCA for 5 months in 2020 with those experiencing IHCA for 5 months in 2021.

Results

Patients sustaining IHCA during the early COVID-19 pandemic period had higher rates of delayed epinephrine administration of more than 5 min (13.4% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.01), more frequent delays in the initiation of chest compressions (55.6% vs. 17.9%; p < 0.01), and were intubated less often (23.0% vs. 59.3%; p < 0.01). In terms of outcomes, both return of spontaneous circulation (35.8% vs. 51.2%; p < 0.01) and survival to hospital discharge rates (13.9% vs. 30.2%; p < 0.01) were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.

Conclusions

The early COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with delays in epinephrine administration and chest compression initiation for IHCA. Moreover, both return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1