Mehek Biswas , Chandra R. Bhat , Abdul Rawoof Pinjari
{"title":"使用集中的 RP-SP 选择数据,同时确定备选属性和这些属性的随机系数","authors":"Mehek Biswas , Chandra R. Bhat , Abdul Rawoof Pinjari","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2024.102988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Random utility maximization-based discrete choice models involve utility functions that are typically specified with explanatory variables representing alternative-specific attributes. It may be useful to specify some alternative-specific attributes as stochastic in situations when the analyst cannot accurately measure the attribute values considered by the decision maker. In addition, the parameters representing decision makers’ response to the attributes may have to be specified as stochastic to recognize response heterogeneity in the population. Ignoring either of these two sources of stochasticity can lead to biased parameter estimates and distorted willingness-to-pay estimates. Further, in some situations the analyst may not even have access to measurements of important alternative-specific attributes to include them in the utility specification. In this study, we explore the feasibility of simultaneously inferring alternative attributes and the corresponding coefficients, as well as stochasticity in both – without the help of external measurement data on alternative attributes – using mixed logit models on pooled revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) choice datasets. To do so, we first theoretically examine parameter identifiability for different specifications and distributional forms of alternative attributes and their coefficients. Next, we illustrate this through simulation experiments in a travel mode choice setting and demonstrate the conditions under which pooled RP-SP data can help disentangle stochastic alternative attributes from random coefficients. In addition, an empirical application is presented in the context of commute mode choice in Bengaluru, India, to demonstrate the importance of recognizing stochasticity in mode-specific in-vehicle travel times along with the random coefficient on in-vehicle travel times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 102988"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of pooled RP-SP choice data to simultaneously identify alternative attributes and random coefficients on those attributes\",\"authors\":\"Mehek Biswas , Chandra R. Bhat , Abdul Rawoof Pinjari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trb.2024.102988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Random utility maximization-based discrete choice models involve utility functions that are typically specified with explanatory variables representing alternative-specific attributes. It may be useful to specify some alternative-specific attributes as stochastic in situations when the analyst cannot accurately measure the attribute values considered by the decision maker. In addition, the parameters representing decision makers’ response to the attributes may have to be specified as stochastic to recognize response heterogeneity in the population. Ignoring either of these two sources of stochasticity can lead to biased parameter estimates and distorted willingness-to-pay estimates. Further, in some situations the analyst may not even have access to measurements of important alternative-specific attributes to include them in the utility specification. In this study, we explore the feasibility of simultaneously inferring alternative attributes and the corresponding coefficients, as well as stochasticity in both – without the help of external measurement data on alternative attributes – using mixed logit models on pooled revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) choice datasets. To do so, we first theoretically examine parameter identifiability for different specifications and distributional forms of alternative attributes and their coefficients. Next, we illustrate this through simulation experiments in a travel mode choice setting and demonstrate the conditions under which pooled RP-SP data can help disentangle stochastic alternative attributes from random coefficients. In addition, an empirical application is presented in the context of commute mode choice in Bengaluru, India, to demonstrate the importance of recognizing stochasticity in mode-specific in-vehicle travel times along with the random coefficient on in-vehicle travel times.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001127\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of pooled RP-SP choice data to simultaneously identify alternative attributes and random coefficients on those attributes
Random utility maximization-based discrete choice models involve utility functions that are typically specified with explanatory variables representing alternative-specific attributes. It may be useful to specify some alternative-specific attributes as stochastic in situations when the analyst cannot accurately measure the attribute values considered by the decision maker. In addition, the parameters representing decision makers’ response to the attributes may have to be specified as stochastic to recognize response heterogeneity in the population. Ignoring either of these two sources of stochasticity can lead to biased parameter estimates and distorted willingness-to-pay estimates. Further, in some situations the analyst may not even have access to measurements of important alternative-specific attributes to include them in the utility specification. In this study, we explore the feasibility of simultaneously inferring alternative attributes and the corresponding coefficients, as well as stochasticity in both – without the help of external measurement data on alternative attributes – using mixed logit models on pooled revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) choice datasets. To do so, we first theoretically examine parameter identifiability for different specifications and distributional forms of alternative attributes and their coefficients. Next, we illustrate this through simulation experiments in a travel mode choice setting and demonstrate the conditions under which pooled RP-SP data can help disentangle stochastic alternative attributes from random coefficients. In addition, an empirical application is presented in the context of commute mode choice in Bengaluru, India, to demonstrate the importance of recognizing stochasticity in mode-specific in-vehicle travel times along with the random coefficient on in-vehicle travel times.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.