利用人工智能筛查糖尿病视网膜病变:真实世界评估。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Acta Diabetologica Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1007/s00592-024-02333-x
Silvia Burlina, Sandra Radin, Marzia Poggiato, Dario Cioccoloni, Daniele Raimondo, Giovanni Romanello, Chiara Tommasi, Simonetta Lombardi
{"title":"利用人工智能筛查糖尿病视网膜病变:真实世界评估。","authors":"Silvia Burlina, Sandra Radin, Marzia Poggiato, Dario Cioccoloni, Daniele Raimondo, Giovanni Romanello, Chiara Tommasi, Simonetta Lombardi","doi":"10.1007/s00592-024-02333-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Periodic screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is effective for preventing blindness. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems could be useful for increasing the screening of DR in diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the DAIRET system in detecting DR to that of ophthalmologists in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fundus photography was performed with a nonmydriatic camera in 958 consecutive patients older than 18 years who were affected by diabetes and who were enrolled in the DR screening in the Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit and in the Eye Unit of ULSS8 Berica (Italy) between June 2022 and June 2023. All retinal images were evaluated by DAIRET, which is a machine learning algorithm based on AI. In addition, all the images obtained were analysed by an ophthalmologist who graded the images. The results obtained by DAIRET were compared with those obtained by the ophthalmologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 958 patients, but only 867 (90.5%) patients had retinal images sufficient for evaluation by a human grader. The sensitivity for detecting cases of moderate DR and above was 1 (100%), and the sensitivity for detecting cases of mild DR was 0.84 ± 0.03. The specificity of detecting the absence of DR was lower (0.59 ± 0.04) because of the high number of false-positives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DAIRET showed an optimal sensitivity in detecting all cases of referable DR (moderate DR or above) compared with that of a human grader. On the other hand, the specificity of DAIRET was low because of the high number of false-positives, which limits its cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for diabetic retinopathy with artificial intelligence: a real world evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Burlina, Sandra Radin, Marzia Poggiato, Dario Cioccoloni, Daniele Raimondo, Giovanni Romanello, Chiara Tommasi, Simonetta Lombardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00592-024-02333-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Periodic screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is effective for preventing blindness. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems could be useful for increasing the screening of DR in diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the DAIRET system in detecting DR to that of ophthalmologists in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fundus photography was performed with a nonmydriatic camera in 958 consecutive patients older than 18 years who were affected by diabetes and who were enrolled in the DR screening in the Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit and in the Eye Unit of ULSS8 Berica (Italy) between June 2022 and June 2023. All retinal images were evaluated by DAIRET, which is a machine learning algorithm based on AI. In addition, all the images obtained were analysed by an ophthalmologist who graded the images. The results obtained by DAIRET were compared with those obtained by the ophthalmologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 958 patients, but only 867 (90.5%) patients had retinal images sufficient for evaluation by a human grader. The sensitivity for detecting cases of moderate DR and above was 1 (100%), and the sensitivity for detecting cases of mild DR was 0.84 ± 0.03. The specificity of detecting the absence of DR was lower (0.59 ± 0.04) because of the high number of false-positives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DAIRET showed an optimal sensitivity in detecting all cases of referable DR (moderate DR or above) compared with that of a human grader. On the other hand, the specificity of DAIRET was low because of the high number of false-positives, which limits its cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02333-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02333-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:定期筛查糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)可有效预防失明。人工智能(AI)系统可以帮助提高糖尿病患者的 DR 筛查率。本研究旨在比较 DAIRET 系统与眼科医生在实际环境中检测 DR 的性能:方法:在 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,使用非眼底照相机对连续 958 名 18 岁以上的糖尿病患者进行了眼底照相,这些患者参加了糖尿病和内分泌科以及 ULSS8 Berica(意大利)眼科的 DR 筛查。所有视网膜图像都经过 DAIRET 评估,这是一种基于人工智能的机器学习算法。此外,所有获得的图像均由一名眼科医生进行分析,并对图像进行分级。DAIRET得出的结果与眼科医生得出的结果进行了比较:我们纳入了 958 名患者,但只有 867 名(90.5%)患者的视网膜图像足以由人工分级师进行评估。检测中度及以上 DR 病例的灵敏度为 1(100%),检测轻度 DR 病例的灵敏度为 0.84 ± 0.03。由于假阳性的数量较多,检测无 DR 的特异性较低(0.59 ± 0.04):结论:与人类分级人员相比,DAIRET 在检测所有可转诊 DR(中度或以上 DR)病例方面显示出最佳灵敏度。结论:DAIRET 在检测所有可转诊 DR(中度 DR 或以上)病例方面的灵敏度优于人工分级仪,但由于假阳性病例较多,DAIRET 的特异性较低,限制了其成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening for diabetic retinopathy with artificial intelligence: a real world evaluation.

Aim: Periodic screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is effective for preventing blindness. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems could be useful for increasing the screening of DR in diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the DAIRET system in detecting DR to that of ophthalmologists in a real-world setting.

Methods: Fundus photography was performed with a nonmydriatic camera in 958 consecutive patients older than 18 years who were affected by diabetes and who were enrolled in the DR screening in the Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit and in the Eye Unit of ULSS8 Berica (Italy) between June 2022 and June 2023. All retinal images were evaluated by DAIRET, which is a machine learning algorithm based on AI. In addition, all the images obtained were analysed by an ophthalmologist who graded the images. The results obtained by DAIRET were compared with those obtained by the ophthalmologist.

Results: We included 958 patients, but only 867 (90.5%) patients had retinal images sufficient for evaluation by a human grader. The sensitivity for detecting cases of moderate DR and above was 1 (100%), and the sensitivity for detecting cases of mild DR was 0.84 ± 0.03. The specificity of detecting the absence of DR was lower (0.59 ± 0.04) because of the high number of false-positives.

Conclusion: DAIRET showed an optimal sensitivity in detecting all cases of referable DR (moderate DR or above) compared with that of a human grader. On the other hand, the specificity of DAIRET was low because of the high number of false-positives, which limits its cost-effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Successful Antibiotic Treatment of Osteomyelitis in Diabetic Forefoot Infection. Time-dependent electroretinogram, metabolomics and lipidomics screened metabolic markers for monitoring the process of diabetic retinopathy from scratch. Revisiting the markers interleukin-6 and glucagon-like peptide-1 for targeting low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and our lab experience. Expert panel opinion on the optimal educational pathway for diabetes educators for training people with type 1 diabetes on the MiniMed™ 780G system: a Delphi consensus. Identification and characterization of a case of mild familial partial lipodystrophy in a carrier of a LMNA p.Arg582Leu variant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1