Xinyi Peng, Miaomiao Zhuang, Qirui Song, Jingjing Bai, Jun Cai
{"title":"多重危险因素控制水平对高血压患者心血管预后的影响。","authors":"Xinyi Peng, Miaomiao Zhuang, Qirui Song, Jingjing Bai, Jun Cai","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure intervention is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure lowering strategy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤ 3) and cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤ 3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factor was modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients. Trial registration STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of multiple risk factor control level on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Peng, Miaomiao Zhuang, Qirui Song, Jingjing Bai, Jun Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure intervention is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure lowering strategy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤ 3) and cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤ 3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factor was modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients. Trial registration STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:对高血压患者进行血压干预时,基线危险因素控制水平与心血管预后之间的关系尚不十分清楚。基线危险因素控制水平与高血压患者接受降压干预后的心血管预后是否有说服力也不清楚:我们对老年高血压患者血压干预策略(STEP)试验进行了分析。没有完整基线危险因素数据的参与者被排除在外。主要结果是心血管事件和全因死亡率的复合结果。Cox比例危险模型用于计算危险比(HR)和估计危险因素控制水平(≥6、5、4和≤3)与心血管结局之间的关系:共有 8337 人参与了分析,中位随访时间为 3.19 年。未控制的风险因素每增加一个,心血管风险就会增加24%(HR 1.24,95% CI 1.11-1.37)。与最佳控制风险因素的参与者相比,控制了≤3个风险因素的参与者心血管风险高出95%(HR 1.95,95% CI 1.37-2.77)。多种风险因素调整的相应保护作用不受强化或标准降压治疗的影响(交互作用的 P = 0.71):结论:高血压患者的心血管风险与控制危险因素的数量之间存在逐步关联。无论采用何种降压策略,改变的危险因素越多,心血管风险就越低。要降低高血压患者的心血管疾病风险,必须采取全面的风险因素控制策略。试验注册 STEP ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03015311。2017年1月2日注册。
Influence of multiple risk factor control level on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.
Objective: The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure intervention is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure lowering strategy.
Method: We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤ 3) and cardiovascular outcomes.
Results: A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤ 3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).
Conclusions: A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factor was modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients. Trial registration STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.