算法驱动的家庭烹饪活动估算及其对室内 PM2.5 评估的影响

Sanjana Bhaskar , Andrew Shapero , Futu Chen , MyDzung T. Chu , Rachel C. Nethery , Jaime E. Hart , Gary Adamkiewicz
{"title":"算法驱动的家庭烹饪活动估算及其对室内 PM2.5 评估的影响","authors":"Sanjana Bhaskar ,&nbsp;Andrew Shapero ,&nbsp;Futu Chen ,&nbsp;MyDzung T. Chu ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Nethery ,&nbsp;Jaime E. Hart ,&nbsp;Gary Adamkiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Household PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures have adverse health effects, and cooking behaviors are an important source of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the home. There is a need for accurate measures of cooking activity to better understand its associations with household PM<sub>2.5</sub> since self-reported surveys are often subject to recall bias and misreporting of cooking events.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In this study, we aimed to address limitations associated with a self-reported cooking metric, by using temperature data to estimate cooking activity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed an algorithm to identify cooking events at the 5-minute level using real-time temperature data measured near the stove and in the living room, across 148 households in Chelsea and Dorchester, MA. We compared the number of cooking events identified by this algorithm with cooking events self-reported by participants in daily activity logs and survey responses, and further assessed how these metrics differed with respect to their associations with occurrence of peak PM2.5, in mixed effects logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that 65 % of the cooking events identified by the algorithm were not reported by participants. Furthermore, households classified as frequent vs infrequent cooking households using the algorithm had a larger difference in indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, compared to households classified by self-report. In mixed effects logistic regression models for elevated household PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, we observed much stronger associations between household PM<sub>2.5</sub> and algorithm-derived cooking activity (OR: 2.85 [95 % CI: 2.76, 2.95]) as compared to the association between household PM<sub>2.5</sub> and self-reported cooking activity (OR: 1.22 [95 % CI: 1.17, 1.27] for stove use and OR: 1.67 [95 % CI: 1.58, 1.76] for grill use/frying/broiling/sauteing).</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Overall, the algorithm developed in this study presents a data-driven approach to collecting cooking activity data in U.S. households, that may be more indicative of actual cooking events and also more predictive of household PM<sub>2.5</sub> in indoor environmental models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000298/pdfft?md5=ca0459171c50fafddef74de4414ae7a7&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000298-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithm-driven estimation of household cooking activity and its impact on indoor PM2.5 assessments\",\"authors\":\"Sanjana Bhaskar ,&nbsp;Andrew Shapero ,&nbsp;Futu Chen ,&nbsp;MyDzung T. Chu ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Nethery ,&nbsp;Jaime E. Hart ,&nbsp;Gary Adamkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Household PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures have adverse health effects, and cooking behaviors are an important source of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the home. There is a need for accurate measures of cooking activity to better understand its associations with household PM<sub>2.5</sub> since self-reported surveys are often subject to recall bias and misreporting of cooking events.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In this study, we aimed to address limitations associated with a self-reported cooking metric, by using temperature data to estimate cooking activity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed an algorithm to identify cooking events at the 5-minute level using real-time temperature data measured near the stove and in the living room, across 148 households in Chelsea and Dorchester, MA. We compared the number of cooking events identified by this algorithm with cooking events self-reported by participants in daily activity logs and survey responses, and further assessed how these metrics differed with respect to their associations with occurrence of peak PM2.5, in mixed effects logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that 65 % of the cooking events identified by the algorithm were not reported by participants. Furthermore, households classified as frequent vs infrequent cooking households using the algorithm had a larger difference in indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, compared to households classified by self-report. In mixed effects logistic regression models for elevated household PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, we observed much stronger associations between household PM<sub>2.5</sub> and algorithm-derived cooking activity (OR: 2.85 [95 % CI: 2.76, 2.95]) as compared to the association between household PM<sub>2.5</sub> and self-reported cooking activity (OR: 1.22 [95 % CI: 1.17, 1.27] for stove use and OR: 1.67 [95 % CI: 1.58, 1.76] for grill use/frying/broiling/sauteing).</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Overall, the algorithm developed in this study presents a data-driven approach to collecting cooking activity data in U.S. households, that may be more indicative of actual cooking events and also more predictive of household PM<sub>2.5</sub> in indoor environmental models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000298/pdfft?md5=ca0459171c50fafddef74de4414ae7a7&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000298-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景家庭 PM2.5 暴露会对健康产生不利影响,而烹饪行为是家庭 PM2.5 的一个重要来源。我们开发了一种算法,利用在马萨诸塞州切尔西和多尔切斯特 148 个家庭的炉灶附近和客厅测量到的实时温度数据来识别 5 分钟级别的烹饪活动。我们将该算法识别出的烹饪事件数量与参与者在日常活动日志和调查回复中自行报告的烹饪事件数量进行了比较,并在混合效应逻辑回归模型中进一步评估了这些指标与 PM2.5 峰值发生率之间的关联差异。此外,与通过自我报告进行分类的家庭相比,使用该算法划分为经常烹饪和不经常烹饪的家庭的室内 PM2.5 水平差异更大。在家庭 PM2.5 水平升高的混合效应逻辑回归模型中,我们观察到,与家庭 PM2.5 与自我报告的烹饪活动之间的关系(炉灶使用 OR:1.22 [95 % CI:1.17, 1.27],OR:1.总体而言,本研究中开发的算法提出了一种数据驱动的方法来收集美国家庭的烹饪活动数据,这种方法可能更能反映实际的烹饪活动,也更能预测室内环境模型中的家庭 PM2.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Algorithm-driven estimation of household cooking activity and its impact on indoor PM2.5 assessments

Background

Household PM2.5 exposures have adverse health effects, and cooking behaviors are an important source of PM2.5 in the home. There is a need for accurate measures of cooking activity to better understand its associations with household PM2.5 since self-reported surveys are often subject to recall bias and misreporting of cooking events.

Objective

In this study, we aimed to address limitations associated with a self-reported cooking metric, by using temperature data to estimate cooking activity.

Methods

We developed an algorithm to identify cooking events at the 5-minute level using real-time temperature data measured near the stove and in the living room, across 148 households in Chelsea and Dorchester, MA. We compared the number of cooking events identified by this algorithm with cooking events self-reported by participants in daily activity logs and survey responses, and further assessed how these metrics differed with respect to their associations with occurrence of peak PM2.5, in mixed effects logistic regression models.

Results

We found that 65 % of the cooking events identified by the algorithm were not reported by participants. Furthermore, households classified as frequent vs infrequent cooking households using the algorithm had a larger difference in indoor PM2.5 levels, compared to households classified by self-report. In mixed effects logistic regression models for elevated household PM2.5 levels, we observed much stronger associations between household PM2.5 and algorithm-derived cooking activity (OR: 2.85 [95 % CI: 2.76, 2.95]) as compared to the association between household PM2.5 and self-reported cooking activity (OR: 1.22 [95 % CI: 1.17, 1.27] for stove use and OR: 1.67 [95 % CI: 1.58, 1.76] for grill use/frying/broiling/sauteing).

Significance

Overall, the algorithm developed in this study presents a data-driven approach to collecting cooking activity data in U.S. households, that may be more indicative of actual cooking events and also more predictive of household PM2.5 in indoor environmental models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Ventilation characteristics in a hospital where a COVID-19 outbreak occurred in the winter of 2020” [Indoor Environ. 2 (2025) 100065] Implementing Bayesian inference on a stochastic CO2-based grey-box model CO2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in public schools: A retrospective cohort study in Montreal (Canada) Cognition, economic decision-making, and physiological response to carbon dioxide Personal air cleaning by a user-tracking robot equipped with a nanofiber air cleaner in a large work space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1