Mohamed Elgendi, Fridolin Haugg, Richard Ribon Fletcher, John Allen, Hangsik Shin, Aymen Alian, Carlo Menon
{"title":"关于评估基于光敏血压计的血压评估算法的建议。","authors":"Mohamed Elgendi, Fridolin Haugg, Richard Ribon Fletcher, John Allen, Hangsik Shin, Aymen Alian, Carlo Menon","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00555-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures changes in blood volume in the microvascular tissue bed of the body. While it shows potential as a clinical tool for blood pressure (BP) assessment and hypertension management, several sources of error can affect its performance. One such source is the PPG-based algorithm, which can lead to measurement bias and inaccuracy. Here, we review seven widely used measures to assess PPG-based algorithm performance and recommend implementing standardized error evaluation steps in their development. This standardization can reduce bias and improve the reliability and accuracy of PPG-based BP estimation, leading to better health outcomes for patients managing hypertension. Elgendi et al. discuss pros and cons of seven measures to assess photoplethysmography-based algorithm performance for blood pressure estimation. They highlight the need for standardized error evaluation to enhance accuracy and reliability in hypertension management and make recommendations to achieve this goal.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for evaluating photoplethysmography-based algorithms for blood pressure assessment\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Elgendi, Fridolin Haugg, Richard Ribon Fletcher, John Allen, Hangsik Shin, Aymen Alian, Carlo Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-024-00555-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures changes in blood volume in the microvascular tissue bed of the body. While it shows potential as a clinical tool for blood pressure (BP) assessment and hypertension management, several sources of error can affect its performance. One such source is the PPG-based algorithm, which can lead to measurement bias and inaccuracy. Here, we review seven widely used measures to assess PPG-based algorithm performance and recommend implementing standardized error evaluation steps in their development. This standardization can reduce bias and improve the reliability and accuracy of PPG-based BP estimation, leading to better health outcomes for patients managing hypertension. Elgendi et al. discuss pros and cons of seven measures to assess photoplethysmography-based algorithm performance for blood pressure estimation. They highlight the need for standardized error evaluation to enhance accuracy and reliability in hypertension management and make recommendations to achieve this goal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recommendations for evaluating photoplethysmography-based algorithms for blood pressure assessment
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures changes in blood volume in the microvascular tissue bed of the body. While it shows potential as a clinical tool for blood pressure (BP) assessment and hypertension management, several sources of error can affect its performance. One such source is the PPG-based algorithm, which can lead to measurement bias and inaccuracy. Here, we review seven widely used measures to assess PPG-based algorithm performance and recommend implementing standardized error evaluation steps in their development. This standardization can reduce bias and improve the reliability and accuracy of PPG-based BP estimation, leading to better health outcomes for patients managing hypertension. Elgendi et al. discuss pros and cons of seven measures to assess photoplethysmography-based algorithm performance for blood pressure estimation. They highlight the need for standardized error evaluation to enhance accuracy and reliability in hypertension management and make recommendations to achieve this goal.