急诊医学中量身定制的领导力培训:EMLeaders 计划对英格兰顾问和受训人员影响的定性探索。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2023-213868
Rosie Kneafsey, Amanda Moore, Shea Palmer, Ala Szczepura, Gareth Hooper, Caroline Leech, Chris Turner, Aanika Khan, Bhupinder Pawar, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye
{"title":"急诊医学中量身定制的领导力培训:EMLeaders 计划对英格兰顾问和受训人员影响的定性探索。","authors":"Rosie Kneafsey, Amanda Moore, Shea Palmer, Ala Szczepura, Gareth Hooper, Caroline Leech, Chris Turner, Aanika Khan, Bhupinder Pawar, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM) consultants are expected to provide leadership to facilitate optimal clinical results, effective teamwork and learning. To foster leadership skills, the Emergency Medicine Leadership Programme (EMLeaders) was launched in 2018 by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), Health Education England and National Health Service England. A mixed-methods evaluation of EMLeaders was commissioned to assess the impact at the strategic, team and individual levels. This paper reports the qualitative evaluation component.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data collected from 2021 to 2022 were drawn from an online survey of RCEM members in England, which included four open questions about leadership training. At the end of the survey, participants were asked to share contact details if willing to undertake an in-depth qualitative interview. Interviews explored perceptions of the programme and impact of curriculum design and delivery. Data were analysed thematically against the Kirkpatrick framework, providing in-depth understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 417 survey respondents, of whom 177 had participated in EMLeaders. Semistructured interviews were completed with 13 EM consultants, 13 trainees and 1 specialty and associate specialist doctor. EMLeaders was highly valued by EM consultants and trainees, particularly group interaction, expert facilitation and face-to-face practical scenario work. Consultant data yielded the themes: we believe in it; EM relevance is key; on a leadership journey; shaping better leaders; and a broken system. Challenges were identified in building engagement within a pressured workplace system and embedding workplace role modelling. Trainees identified behavioural shift in themselves following the programme but wanted more face-to-face discussions with senior colleagues. Key trainee themes included value in being together, storytelling in leadership, headspace for the leadership lens and survival in a state of collapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development of leadership skills in EM is considered important. The EMLeaders programme can support leadership learning but further embedding is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"543-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailored leadership training in emergency medicine: qualitative exploration of the impact of the EMLeaders programme on consultants and trainees in England.\",\"authors\":\"Rosie Kneafsey, Amanda Moore, Shea Palmer, Ala Szczepura, Gareth Hooper, Caroline Leech, Chris Turner, Aanika Khan, Bhupinder Pawar, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2023-213868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM) consultants are expected to provide leadership to facilitate optimal clinical results, effective teamwork and learning. To foster leadership skills, the Emergency Medicine Leadership Programme (EMLeaders) was launched in 2018 by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), Health Education England and National Health Service England. A mixed-methods evaluation of EMLeaders was commissioned to assess the impact at the strategic, team and individual levels. This paper reports the qualitative evaluation component.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data collected from 2021 to 2022 were drawn from an online survey of RCEM members in England, which included four open questions about leadership training. At the end of the survey, participants were asked to share contact details if willing to undertake an in-depth qualitative interview. Interviews explored perceptions of the programme and impact of curriculum design and delivery. Data were analysed thematically against the Kirkpatrick framework, providing in-depth understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 417 survey respondents, of whom 177 had participated in EMLeaders. Semistructured interviews were completed with 13 EM consultants, 13 trainees and 1 specialty and associate specialist doctor. EMLeaders was highly valued by EM consultants and trainees, particularly group interaction, expert facilitation and face-to-face practical scenario work. Consultant data yielded the themes: we believe in it; EM relevance is key; on a leadership journey; shaping better leaders; and a broken system. Challenges were identified in building engagement within a pressured workplace system and embedding workplace role modelling. Trainees identified behavioural shift in themselves following the programme but wanted more face-to-face discussions with senior colleagues. Key trainee themes included value in being together, storytelling in leadership, headspace for the leadership lens and survival in a state of collapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development of leadership skills in EM is considered important. The EMLeaders programme can support leadership learning but further embedding is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"543-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊医学(EM)顾问应发挥领导作用,以促进最佳临床效果、有效的团队合作和学习。为培养领导技能,英国皇家急诊医学院(RCEM)、英格兰卫生教育署(Health Education England)和英格兰国民健康服务局(National Health Service England)于 2018 年推出了急诊医学领导力计划(EMLeaders)。为评估 EMLeaders 在战略、团队和个人层面的影响,委托开展了一项混合方法评估。本文报告了定性评估部分:从 2021 年到 2022 年收集的定性数据来自英格兰 RCEM 成员的在线调查,其中包括四个有关领导力培训的开放性问题。调查结束时,参与者被要求提供联系方式,如果愿意进行深入的定性访谈的话。访谈内容包括对课程的看法以及课程设计和实施的影响。根据柯克帕特里克框架对数据进行了专题分析,以提供深入的理解:共有 417 名调查对象,其中 177 人参加过 EMLeaders。对 13 名急诊科顾问、13 名受训人员和 1 名专科医生和副专科医生进行了结构化访谈。EMLeaders受到了急诊科顾问和学员的高度评价,尤其是小组互动、专家指导和面对面的实际情景模拟。顾问数据产生了以下主题:我们相信它;电磁相关性是关键;领导力之旅;塑造更好的领导者;以及破碎的系统。在压力重重的工作场所系统中建立参与感和树立工作场所榜样方面存在挑战。受训人员发现自己在课程结束后的行为发生了转变,但希望与资深同事进行更多面对面的讨论。受训人员的关键主题包括:在一起的价值、在领导力中讲故事、领导力视角的思考空间以及在崩溃状态下的生存:结论:在急诊科发展领导技能被认为是非常重要的。EMLeaders计划可以支持领导力学习,但还需要进一步的嵌入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tailored leadership training in emergency medicine: qualitative exploration of the impact of the EMLeaders programme on consultants and trainees in England.

Background: Emergency medicine (EM) consultants are expected to provide leadership to facilitate optimal clinical results, effective teamwork and learning. To foster leadership skills, the Emergency Medicine Leadership Programme (EMLeaders) was launched in 2018 by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), Health Education England and National Health Service England. A mixed-methods evaluation of EMLeaders was commissioned to assess the impact at the strategic, team and individual levels. This paper reports the qualitative evaluation component.

Methods: Qualitative data collected from 2021 to 2022 were drawn from an online survey of RCEM members in England, which included four open questions about leadership training. At the end of the survey, participants were asked to share contact details if willing to undertake an in-depth qualitative interview. Interviews explored perceptions of the programme and impact of curriculum design and delivery. Data were analysed thematically against the Kirkpatrick framework, providing in-depth understanding.

Results: There were 417 survey respondents, of whom 177 had participated in EMLeaders. Semistructured interviews were completed with 13 EM consultants, 13 trainees and 1 specialty and associate specialist doctor. EMLeaders was highly valued by EM consultants and trainees, particularly group interaction, expert facilitation and face-to-face practical scenario work. Consultant data yielded the themes: we believe in it; EM relevance is key; on a leadership journey; shaping better leaders; and a broken system. Challenges were identified in building engagement within a pressured workplace system and embedding workplace role modelling. Trainees identified behavioural shift in themselves following the programme but wanted more face-to-face discussions with senior colleagues. Key trainee themes included value in being together, storytelling in leadership, headspace for the leadership lens and survival in a state of collapse.

Conclusion: The development of leadership skills in EM is considered important. The EMLeaders programme can support leadership learning but further embedding is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Best evidence topic report: can intradermal sterile water injections provide effective pain relief in patients with renal colic? Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek et al. Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek et al. Is it time to reframe resuscitation in trauma? Are there differences in low-acuity emergency department visits between culturally and linguistically diverse migrants and people with English-speaking background: a population-based linkage study of adults over 45.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1