基于深度学习的 99mTc 二乙烯三胺五乙酸肾脏扫描分流肾小球滤过率测量。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Physics Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1186/s40658-024-00664-w
Sejin Ha, Byung Soo Park, Sangwon Han, Jungsu S Oh, Sun Young Chae, Jae Seung Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon
{"title":"基于深度学习的 99mTc 二乙烯三胺五乙酸肾脏扫描分流肾小球滤过率测量。","authors":"Sejin Ha, Byung Soo Park, Sangwon Han, Jungsu S Oh, Sun Young Chae, Jae Seung Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00664-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a deep learning (DL) model for generating automated regions of interest (ROIs) on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scans for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Manually-drawn ROIs retrieved from a Picture Archiving and Communications System were used as ground-truth (GT) labels. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network architecture with multichannel input was trained to generate DL ROIs. The agreement between GFR values from GT and DL ROIs was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and slope coefficients for linear regression analyses. Bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were assessed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,364 scans (12,822 patients) were included. Excellent concordance between GT and DL GFR was found for left (CCC 0.982, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.981-0.982; slope 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004), right (CCC 0.969, 95% CI 0.968-0.969; slope 0.954, 95% CI 0.953-0.955) and both kidneys (CCC 0.978, 95% CI 0.978-0.979; slope 0.979, 95% CI 0.978-0.979). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias between GT and DL GFR, with mean differences of - 0.2 (95% LOA - 4.4-4.0), 1.4 (95% LOA - 3.5-6.3) and 1.2 (95% LOA - 6.5-8.8) mL/min/1.73 m² for left, right and both kidneys, respectively. Notably, 19,960 scans (81.9%) showed an absolute difference in GFR of less than 5 mL/min/1.73 m².</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our DL model exhibited excellent performance in the generation of ROIs on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-DTPA renal scans. This automated approach could potentially reduce manual effort and enhance the precision of GFR measurement in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based measurement of split glomerular filtration rate with <sup>99m</sup>Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid renal scan.\",\"authors\":\"Sejin Ha, Byung Soo Park, Sangwon Han, Jungsu S Oh, Sun Young Chae, Jae Seung Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-024-00664-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a deep learning (DL) model for generating automated regions of interest (ROIs) on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scans for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Manually-drawn ROIs retrieved from a Picture Archiving and Communications System were used as ground-truth (GT) labels. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network architecture with multichannel input was trained to generate DL ROIs. The agreement between GFR values from GT and DL ROIs was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and slope coefficients for linear regression analyses. Bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were assessed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24,364 scans (12,822 patients) were included. Excellent concordance between GT and DL GFR was found for left (CCC 0.982, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.981-0.982; slope 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004), right (CCC 0.969, 95% CI 0.968-0.969; slope 0.954, 95% CI 0.953-0.955) and both kidneys (CCC 0.978, 95% CI 0.978-0.979; slope 0.979, 95% CI 0.978-0.979). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias between GT and DL GFR, with mean differences of - 0.2 (95% LOA - 4.4-4.0), 1.4 (95% LOA - 3.5-6.3) and 1.2 (95% LOA - 6.5-8.8) mL/min/1.73 m² for left, right and both kidneys, respectively. Notably, 19,960 scans (81.9%) showed an absolute difference in GFR of less than 5 mL/min/1.73 m².</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our DL model exhibited excellent performance in the generation of ROIs on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-DTPA renal scans. This automated approach could potentially reduce manual effort and enhance the precision of GFR measurement in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00664-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00664-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于在99m锝-二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)肾脏扫描中自动生成感兴趣区(ROI),以测量肾小球滤过率(GFR):从图片存档和通信系统中手动绘制的 ROI 作为地面实况(GT)标签。对具有多通道输入的二维 U-Net 卷积神经网络架构进行了训练,以生成 DL ROI。使用Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC)和线性回归分析的斜率系数评估GT和DL ROI的GFR值之间的一致性。使用Bland-Altman图评估偏差和95%的一致性界限(LOA):共纳入 24,364 次扫描(12,822 名患者)。左肾(CCC 0.982,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.981-0.982;斜率 1.004,95% 置信区间 1.003-1.004)、右肾(CCC 0.969,95% 置信区间 0.968-0.969;斜率 0.954,95% 置信区间 0.953-0.955)和双肾(CCC 0.978,95% 置信区间 0.978-0.979;斜率 0.979,95% 置信区间 0.978-0.979)GT 和 DL GFR 的一致性极佳。Bland-Altman分析显示,GT和DL GFR之间的偏差极小,左肾、右肾和双肾的平均差异分别为-0.2(95% LOA - 4.4-4.0)、1.4(95% LOA - 3.5-6.3)和1.2(95% LOA - 6.5-8.8) mL/min/1.73 m²。值得注意的是,有 19,960 次扫描(81.9%)显示 GFR 的绝对差异小于 5 mL/min/1.73 m²:我们的 DL 模型在生成 99mTc-DTPA 肾扫描的 ROI 方面表现出色。这种自动化方法有可能减少人工操作,提高临床实践中 GFR 测量的精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning-based measurement of split glomerular filtration rate with 99mTc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid renal scan.

Purpose: To develop a deep learning (DL) model for generating automated regions of interest (ROIs) on 99mTc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scans for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement.

Methods: Manually-drawn ROIs retrieved from a Picture Archiving and Communications System were used as ground-truth (GT) labels. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network architecture with multichannel input was trained to generate DL ROIs. The agreement between GFR values from GT and DL ROIs was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and slope coefficients for linear regression analyses. Bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: A total of 24,364 scans (12,822 patients) were included. Excellent concordance between GT and DL GFR was found for left (CCC 0.982, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.981-0.982; slope 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004), right (CCC 0.969, 95% CI 0.968-0.969; slope 0.954, 95% CI 0.953-0.955) and both kidneys (CCC 0.978, 95% CI 0.978-0.979; slope 0.979, 95% CI 0.978-0.979). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias between GT and DL GFR, with mean differences of - 0.2 (95% LOA - 4.4-4.0), 1.4 (95% LOA - 3.5-6.3) and 1.2 (95% LOA - 6.5-8.8) mL/min/1.73 m² for left, right and both kidneys, respectively. Notably, 19,960 scans (81.9%) showed an absolute difference in GFR of less than 5 mL/min/1.73 m².

Conclusion: Our DL model exhibited excellent performance in the generation of ROIs on 99mTc-DTPA renal scans. This automated approach could potentially reduce manual effort and enhance the precision of GFR measurement in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
期刊最新文献
CT radiation dose reduction with tin filter for localisation/characterisation level image quality in PET-CT: a phantom study. Quantitative analysis of patient motion in walk-through PET scanner and standard axial field of view pet scanner using infrared-based tracking. Comparative analysis of positron emitters for theranostic applications based on small bioconjugates highlighting 43Sc, 61Cu and 45Ti. Impact of cell geometry, cellular uptake region, and tumour morphology on 225Ac and 177Lu dose distributions in prostate cancer. Optimization and application of renal depth measurement method in the cadmium-zinc-telluride‑based SPECT/CT renal dynamic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1