揭示疾病状态的转变:随时间变化的抑郁和焦虑症状网络研究

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1155/2024/4393070
Minne Van Den Noortgate, Manuel Morrens, Albert M. Van Hemert, Robert A. Schoevers, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Erik J. Giltay
{"title":"揭示疾病状态的转变:随时间变化的抑郁和焦虑症状网络研究","authors":"Minne Van Den Noortgate,&nbsp;Manuel Morrens,&nbsp;Albert M. Van Hemert,&nbsp;Robert A. Schoevers,&nbsp;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx,&nbsp;Erik J. Giltay","doi":"10.1155/2024/4393070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders (AD) have high degrees of comorbidity and show great overlap in symptoms. The analysis of covarying depressive- and anxiety symptoms in longitudinal, sparse data panels has received limited attention. Dynamic time warping (DTW) analysis may help to provide new insights into symptom network properties based on diagnostic- and disease-state stability criteria. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. In the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety depressive-, anxiety-, and worry symptoms were assessed four or five times over the course of 9 years using self-report questionnaires. The sample included 1,649 participants at baseline, comprising controls (<i>n</i> = 360), AD patients (<i>n</i> = 158), MDD patients (<i>n</i> = 265), and comorbid AD–MDD patients (<i>n</i> = 866). With DTW, 1,649 distance matrices were calculated, which yielded symptom networks and enabling comparison of network densities among subgroups. <i>Results</i>. The mean age of the sample was 41.5 years (standard deviations, 13.2), of whom 66.4% were female. The largest distance was between worry symptoms and physiological arousal symptoms, implicating the most dissimilar dynamics over time. The network density in the groups, from lowest to highest, followed the order: controls, AD, MDD, and comorbid AD–MDD. The comorbid group showed strongly connected mood and cognitive symptoms, which contrasted with the more strongly connected somatic and arousal symptoms in the AD and MDD groups. Groups that showed more transitions in disease states over follow-up, regardless of the diagnoses, had the highest network density compared to more stable states of health or disease (beta for quadratic term = −0.095; <i>P</i>  &lt; 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>. Symptom networks over time can be visualized by applying DTW methods on sparse panel data. Network density was highest in patients with comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders and those with more instability in disease states, suggesting that a stronger internal connectivity may facilitate “critical transitions” within the complex systems framework.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4393070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling Transitions in Disease States: Study of Depressive and Anxiety Symptom Networks over Time\",\"authors\":\"Minne Van Den Noortgate,&nbsp;Manuel Morrens,&nbsp;Albert M. Van Hemert,&nbsp;Robert A. Schoevers,&nbsp;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx,&nbsp;Erik J. Giltay\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/4393070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders (AD) have high degrees of comorbidity and show great overlap in symptoms. The analysis of covarying depressive- and anxiety symptoms in longitudinal, sparse data panels has received limited attention. Dynamic time warping (DTW) analysis may help to provide new insights into symptom network properties based on diagnostic- and disease-state stability criteria. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. In the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety depressive-, anxiety-, and worry symptoms were assessed four or five times over the course of 9 years using self-report questionnaires. The sample included 1,649 participants at baseline, comprising controls (<i>n</i> = 360), AD patients (<i>n</i> = 158), MDD patients (<i>n</i> = 265), and comorbid AD–MDD patients (<i>n</i> = 866). With DTW, 1,649 distance matrices were calculated, which yielded symptom networks and enabling comparison of network densities among subgroups. <i>Results</i>. The mean age of the sample was 41.5 years (standard deviations, 13.2), of whom 66.4% were female. The largest distance was between worry symptoms and physiological arousal symptoms, implicating the most dissimilar dynamics over time. The network density in the groups, from lowest to highest, followed the order: controls, AD, MDD, and comorbid AD–MDD. The comorbid group showed strongly connected mood and cognitive symptoms, which contrasted with the more strongly connected somatic and arousal symptoms in the AD and MDD groups. Groups that showed more transitions in disease states over follow-up, regardless of the diagnoses, had the highest network density compared to more stable states of health or disease (beta for quadratic term = −0.095; <i>P</i>  &lt; 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>. Symptom networks over time can be visualized by applying DTW methods on sparse panel data. Network density was highest in patients with comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders and those with more instability in disease states, suggesting that a stronger internal connectivity may facilitate “critical transitions” within the complex systems framework.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4393070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4393070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4393070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和焦虑障碍(AD)具有高度的共病性,并且在症状上有很大的重叠。对纵向稀疏数据面板中抑郁症状和焦虑症状的共变分析受到的关注有限。动态时间扭曲(DTW)分析可能有助于根据诊断和疾病状态稳定性标准对症状网络特性提供新的见解。材料与方法。在荷兰抑郁与焦虑研究(Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety)中,在 9 年的时间里使用自我报告问卷对抑郁、焦虑和担忧症状进行了四到五次评估。基线样本包括 1,649 名参与者,其中有对照组(n = 360)、注意力缺失症患者(n = 158)、注意力缺失症患者(n = 265)和注意力缺失症-注意力缺失症合并症患者(n = 866)。通过 DTW 计算出了 1649 个距离矩阵,从而得出了症状网络,并对不同亚组的网络密度进行了比较。研究结果样本的平均年龄为 41.5 岁(标准差为 13.2),其中 66.4% 为女性。忧虑症状和生理唤醒症状之间的距离最大,表明随着时间的推移,两者的动态变化最为不同。各组的网络密度从低到高依次为:对照组、注意力缺失症组、注意力缺失症组和注意力缺失症-注意力缺失症合并组。合并症组的情绪和认知症状联系紧密,这与注意力缺失症和注意力缺失症组的躯体和唤醒症状联系紧密形成鲜明对比。在随访过程中,无论诊断结果如何,疾病状态转变较多的组与健康或疾病状态较稳定的组相比,其网络密度最高(二次项的贝塔值 = -0.095;P < 0.001)。结论通过在稀疏面板数据上应用 DTW 方法,可将随时间变化的症状网络可视化。合并焦虑症和抑郁症的患者以及疾病状态更不稳定的患者的网络密度最高,这表明在复杂系统框架内,更强的内部连通性可能会促进 "临界转换"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling Transitions in Disease States: Study of Depressive and Anxiety Symptom Networks over Time

Background. Major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders (AD) have high degrees of comorbidity and show great overlap in symptoms. The analysis of covarying depressive- and anxiety symptoms in longitudinal, sparse data panels has received limited attention. Dynamic time warping (DTW) analysis may help to provide new insights into symptom network properties based on diagnostic- and disease-state stability criteria. Materials and Methods. In the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety depressive-, anxiety-, and worry symptoms were assessed four or five times over the course of 9 years using self-report questionnaires. The sample included 1,649 participants at baseline, comprising controls (n = 360), AD patients (n = 158), MDD patients (n = 265), and comorbid AD–MDD patients (n = 866). With DTW, 1,649 distance matrices were calculated, which yielded symptom networks and enabling comparison of network densities among subgroups. Results. The mean age of the sample was 41.5 years (standard deviations, 13.2), of whom 66.4% were female. The largest distance was between worry symptoms and physiological arousal symptoms, implicating the most dissimilar dynamics over time. The network density in the groups, from lowest to highest, followed the order: controls, AD, MDD, and comorbid AD–MDD. The comorbid group showed strongly connected mood and cognitive symptoms, which contrasted with the more strongly connected somatic and arousal symptoms in the AD and MDD groups. Groups that showed more transitions in disease states over follow-up, regardless of the diagnoses, had the highest network density compared to more stable states of health or disease (beta for quadratic term = −0.095; P  < 0.001). Conclusions. Symptom networks over time can be visualized by applying DTW methods on sparse panel data. Network density was highest in patients with comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders and those with more instability in disease states, suggesting that a stronger internal connectivity may facilitate “critical transitions” within the complex systems framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Correlational Study of Psychological Resilience, Depression Disorder, and Brain Functional–Structural Hybrid Connectome in Breast Cancer Associations of Changes in Alcohol Consumption on the Risk of Depression/Suicide Among Initial Nondrinkers Effectiveness of a Saffron and Withania Supplement on Mood in Women With Mild-to-Moderate Anxiety During the COVID-19 Lockdown Correlation Between Anxiety and Serum Thyroid Hormone Levels in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Undergoing Microwave Ablation The Bridge Symptoms of Work–Family Conflict, Sleep Disorder, and Job Burnout: A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1