抗菌肽特性对预测活性、选择性和效力有多大作用?

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Current protein & peptide science Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710
Brandt Bertrand, Pablo Luis Hernández Adame, Carlos Munoz-Garay
{"title":"抗菌肽特性对预测活性、选择性和效力有多大作用?","authors":"Brandt Bertrand, Pablo Luis Hernández Adame, Carlos Munoz-Garay","doi":"10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized for their potential application as new generation antibiotics, however, up to date, they have not been widely commercialized as expected. Although current bioinformatic tools can predict antimicrobial activity based on only amino acid sequences with astounding accuracy, peptide selectivity and potency are not foreseeable. This, in turn, creates a bottleneck not only in the discovery and isolation of promising candidates but, most importantly, in the design and development of novel synthetic peptides. In this paper, we discuss the challenges faced when trying to predict peptide selectivity and potency, based on peptide sequence, structure and relevant biophysical properties such as length, net charge and hydrophobicity. Here, pore-forming alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides family isolated from anurans was used as the case study. Our findings revealed no congruent relationship between the predicted peptide properties and reported microbial assay data, such as minimum inhibitory concentrations against microorganisms and hemolysis. In many instances, the peptides with the best physicochemical properties performed poorly against microbial strains. In some cases, the predicted properties were so similar that differences in activity amongst peptides of the same family could not be projected. Our general conclusion is that antimicrobial peptides of interest must be carefully examined since there is no universal strategy for accurately predicting their behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":10859,"journal":{"name":"Current protein & peptide science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Useful are Antimicrobial Peptide Properties for Predicting Activity, Selectivity, and Potency?\",\"authors\":\"Brandt Bertrand, Pablo Luis Hernández Adame, Carlos Munoz-Garay\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized for their potential application as new generation antibiotics, however, up to date, they have not been widely commercialized as expected. Although current bioinformatic tools can predict antimicrobial activity based on only amino acid sequences with astounding accuracy, peptide selectivity and potency are not foreseeable. This, in turn, creates a bottleneck not only in the discovery and isolation of promising candidates but, most importantly, in the design and development of novel synthetic peptides. In this paper, we discuss the challenges faced when trying to predict peptide selectivity and potency, based on peptide sequence, structure and relevant biophysical properties such as length, net charge and hydrophobicity. Here, pore-forming alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides family isolated from anurans was used as the case study. Our findings revealed no congruent relationship between the predicted peptide properties and reported microbial assay data, such as minimum inhibitory concentrations against microorganisms and hemolysis. In many instances, the peptides with the best physicochemical properties performed poorly against microbial strains. In some cases, the predicted properties were so similar that differences in activity amongst peptides of the same family could not be projected. Our general conclusion is that antimicrobial peptides of interest must be carefully examined since there is no universal strategy for accurately predicting their behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current protein & peptide science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current protein & peptide science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protein & peptide science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗菌肽(AMPs)作为新一代抗生素的潜在应用已得到认可,但迄今为止,它们尚未如预期那样广泛商业化。尽管目前的生物信息学工具可以仅根据氨基酸序列预测抗菌活性,其准确性令人震惊,但却无法预见肽的选择性和效力。反过来,这不仅在发现和分离有前景的候选化合物方面,最重要的是在设计和开发新型合成肽方面造成了瓶颈。在本文中,我们将讨论根据肽的序列、结构和相关生物物理特性(如长度、净电荷和疏水性)来预测肽的选择性和效力时所面临的挑战。在这里,我们以从无尾目动物中分离出的α-螺旋形成孔抗菌肽家族为案例进行了研究。我们的研究结果表明,预测的多肽特性与报告的微生物检测数据(如对微生物和溶血的最小抑制浓度)之间并不存在一致的关系。在许多情况下,理化性质最好的多肽对微生物菌株的抑制效果很差。在某些情况下,预测的特性非常相似,以至于无法预测同族肽之间的活性差异。我们的总体结论是,必须仔细研究感兴趣的抗菌肽,因为没有通用的策略可以准确预测它们的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Useful are Antimicrobial Peptide Properties for Predicting Activity, Selectivity, and Potency?

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized for their potential application as new generation antibiotics, however, up to date, they have not been widely commercialized as expected. Although current bioinformatic tools can predict antimicrobial activity based on only amino acid sequences with astounding accuracy, peptide selectivity and potency are not foreseeable. This, in turn, creates a bottleneck not only in the discovery and isolation of promising candidates but, most importantly, in the design and development of novel synthetic peptides. In this paper, we discuss the challenges faced when trying to predict peptide selectivity and potency, based on peptide sequence, structure and relevant biophysical properties such as length, net charge and hydrophobicity. Here, pore-forming alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides family isolated from anurans was used as the case study. Our findings revealed no congruent relationship between the predicted peptide properties and reported microbial assay data, such as minimum inhibitory concentrations against microorganisms and hemolysis. In many instances, the peptides with the best physicochemical properties performed poorly against microbial strains. In some cases, the predicted properties were so similar that differences in activity amongst peptides of the same family could not be projected. Our general conclusion is that antimicrobial peptides of interest must be carefully examined since there is no universal strategy for accurately predicting their behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current protein & peptide science
Current protein & peptide science 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Current Protein & Peptide Science publishes full-length/mini review articles on specific aspects involving proteins, peptides, and interactions between the enzymes, the binding interactions of hormones and their receptors; the properties of transcription factors and other molecules that regulate gene expression; the reactions leading to the immune response; the process of signal transduction; the structure and function of proteins involved in the cytoskeleton and molecular motors; the properties of membrane channels and transporters; and the generation and storage of metabolic energy. In addition, reviews of experimental studies of protein folding and design are given special emphasis. Manuscripts submitted to Current Protein and Peptide Science should cover a field by discussing research from the leading laboratories in a field and should pose questions for future studies. Original papers, research articles and letter articles/short communications are not considered for publication in Current Protein & Peptide Science.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Cell Wall Proteins of Aminoglycosides Resistant and Sensitive Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates. Myotoxicity of Crotoxin on C2C12 Myoblasts and its Inhibition by Crotalus Neutralizing Factor versus Enhanced Resistance in Myotubes: Exploring Toxicity and Membrane Potential. Insights into the Binding of Metadoxine with Bovine Serum Albumin: A Multi-Spectroscopic Investigation Combined with Molecular Docking. A Study on the Rationality of Baicalein in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review. Effects of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-related Q108P Mutation on the Structural Ensemble Characteristics of CHCHD10.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1